Normative BREAST-Q Scores in Sub-Saharan African Women: Interpreting the Impact of Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006495
Brigit D Baglien, Nishant Ganesh Kumar, Sarah H Kennedy, Mahteme Bekele, Paa Ekow Hoyte-Williams, Emmanuel E R Ezeome, Adeyiza O Momoh
{"title":"Normative BREAST-Q Scores in Sub-Saharan African Women: Interpreting the Impact of Mastectomy and Reconstruction.","authors":"Brigit D Baglien, Nishant Ganesh Kumar, Sarah H Kennedy, Mahteme Bekele, Paa Ekow Hoyte-Williams, Emmanuel E R Ezeome, Adeyiza O Momoh","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is a leading cause of mortality among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). As such, optimizing outcomes for treatment and reconstruction is a global health priority. Currently, normative data for interpreting BREAST-Q results are limited to high-income countries. This study seeks to evaluate baseline breast-related quality of life in SSA women without breast cancer and compare it with previously published normative values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women in Ghana, Nigeria, and Ethiopia 18 years of age and older with no history of breast cancer or breast surgery were recruited to complete the BREAST-Q preoperative mastectomy module. Multivariable regression was performed to identify correlations between sociodemographic variables and BREAST-Q scores. Comparisons were made between normative data previously published in high-income countries and within individual SSA populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normative BREAST-Q scores were obtained from a total of 453 women (169 Ghanaian, 210 Nigerian, and 74 Ethiopian) with a mean age of 26 ± 7 years and body mass index of 26 ± 6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Scores were as follows: satisfaction with breasts, 64 ± 26; psychosocial well-being, 63 ± 23; sexual well-being, 57 ± 26; and physical well-being, 68 ± 16. Compared with scores published in the United States, SSA women scored higher in breast satisfaction and lower in psychosocial and physical well-being. Significant differences in scores were also found among countries in SSA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes normative values for the BREAST-Q mastectomy module in a group of women in SSA without breast cancer and found significant variability globally and among countries within the same region.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 2","pages":"e6495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of mortality among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). As such, optimizing outcomes for treatment and reconstruction is a global health priority. Currently, normative data for interpreting BREAST-Q results are limited to high-income countries. This study seeks to evaluate baseline breast-related quality of life in SSA women without breast cancer and compare it with previously published normative values.

Methods: Women in Ghana, Nigeria, and Ethiopia 18 years of age and older with no history of breast cancer or breast surgery were recruited to complete the BREAST-Q preoperative mastectomy module. Multivariable regression was performed to identify correlations between sociodemographic variables and BREAST-Q scores. Comparisons were made between normative data previously published in high-income countries and within individual SSA populations.

Results: Normative BREAST-Q scores were obtained from a total of 453 women (169 Ghanaian, 210 Nigerian, and 74 Ethiopian) with a mean age of 26 ± 7 years and body mass index of 26 ± 6 kg/m2. Scores were as follows: satisfaction with breasts, 64 ± 26; psychosocial well-being, 63 ± 23; sexual well-being, 57 ± 26; and physical well-being, 68 ± 16. Compared with scores published in the United States, SSA women scored higher in breast satisfaction and lower in psychosocial and physical well-being. Significant differences in scores were also found among countries in SSA.

Conclusions: This study establishes normative values for the BREAST-Q mastectomy module in a group of women in SSA without breast cancer and found significant variability globally and among countries within the same region.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撒哈拉以南非洲妇女的标准BREAST-Q评分:解释乳房切除术和乳房重建的影响。
背景:乳腺癌是撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)妇女死亡的主要原因。因此,优化治疗和重建的结果是全球卫生的优先事项。目前,解释BREAST-Q结果的规范性数据仅限于高收入国家。本研究旨在评估无乳腺癌的SSA妇女的基线乳房相关生活质量,并将其与先前发表的正常值进行比较。方法:在加纳、尼日利亚和埃塞俄比亚招募年龄在18岁及以上、无乳腺癌或乳房手术史的女性完成breast - q术前乳房切除术模块。采用多变量回归来确定社会人口学变量与BREAST-Q评分之间的相关性。比较了以前在高收入国家和个别SSA人群中发表的规范性数据。结果:共453名妇女(169名加纳人,210名尼日利亚人,74名埃塞俄比亚人)获得了标准的BREAST-Q评分,平均年龄为26±7岁,体重指数为26±6 kg/m2。评分如下:乳房满意度(64±26);心理社会健康,63±23;性幸福感,57±26;身体健康,68±16。与美国公布的分数相比,SSA女性在乳房满意度方面得分较高,而在心理和身体健康方面得分较低。SSA国家之间的得分也存在显著差异。结论:本研究在一组无乳腺癌的SSA妇女中建立了breast - q乳房切除术模块的规范性值,并发现全球和同一地区的国家之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
Free Latissimus Dorsi-Groin Flap With Arteriovenous Loop for Reconstruction in Severe Lower Limb Crush Injury. Implications of Cuts to Federal Research Funding for Plastic Surgery. The Use of Extracellular Matrix in the Complex Reconstruction of the Lower Leg After Massive Avulsion. Evaluation of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer's Performance in Cosmetic Injection Consultation by Authoritative Plastic Surgeons. Rib-preserving Approach to Efficient Internal Mammary Vessel Preparation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1