Predictors and Impact of Disclosure Efficacy Among Cancer Survivors.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Psycho‐Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1002/pon.70111
Carolyn Rabin
{"title":"Predictors and Impact of Disclosure Efficacy Among Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Carolyn Rabin","doi":"10.1002/pon.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer survivors who disclose their cancer diagnosis and cancer-related experiences derive a variety of benefits including enhanced quality of life. Given this, it would be helpful to better understand the factors that facilitate disclosure among survivors. Disclosure efficacy-confidence that one can successfully execute a self-disclosure-may play a key role.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>In Study 1, survey data were analyzed to identify potential predictors of disclosure efficacy among cancer survivors and whether disclosure efficacy predicts intention to self-disclose in the future. In Study 2, a randomized, controlled design was used to evaluate whether psychoeducation about self-disclosure boosts disclosure efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from 181 cancer survivors who participated in a cross-sectional, online survey study (Study 1) and randomized controlled test of disclosure-related psychoeducational material (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from Study 1 indicated that, as hypothesized, having engaged in more cancer-related disclosure in the past predicted higher levels of disclosure efficacy (though response to prior disclosures did not) and greater disclosure efficacy predicted greater intention to disclose again in the future. The results from Study 2 did not demonstrate that reading psychoeducational information on self-disclosure enhanced disclosure efficacy. However, exploratory analyses indicated that those receiving this information reported greater intention to engage in three of the four recommended, empirically based disclosure strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings underscore the role of disclosure efficacy in facilitating cancer-related disclosure among cancer survivors. Likewise, findings suggest the utility of developing interventions that enhance disclosure efficacy and provide opportunities for behavioral rehearsal of cancer-related disclosures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 2","pages":"e70111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer survivors who disclose their cancer diagnosis and cancer-related experiences derive a variety of benefits including enhanced quality of life. Given this, it would be helpful to better understand the factors that facilitate disclosure among survivors. Disclosure efficacy-confidence that one can successfully execute a self-disclosure-may play a key role.

Aims: In Study 1, survey data were analyzed to identify potential predictors of disclosure efficacy among cancer survivors and whether disclosure efficacy predicts intention to self-disclose in the future. In Study 2, a randomized, controlled design was used to evaluate whether psychoeducation about self-disclosure boosts disclosure efficacy.

Methods: Data were analyzed from 181 cancer survivors who participated in a cross-sectional, online survey study (Study 1) and randomized controlled test of disclosure-related psychoeducational material (Study 2).

Results: The results from Study 1 indicated that, as hypothesized, having engaged in more cancer-related disclosure in the past predicted higher levels of disclosure efficacy (though response to prior disclosures did not) and greater disclosure efficacy predicted greater intention to disclose again in the future. The results from Study 2 did not demonstrate that reading psychoeducational information on self-disclosure enhanced disclosure efficacy. However, exploratory analyses indicated that those receiving this information reported greater intention to engage in three of the four recommended, empirically based disclosure strategies.

Conclusions: Findings underscore the role of disclosure efficacy in facilitating cancer-related disclosure among cancer survivors. Likewise, findings suggest the utility of developing interventions that enhance disclosure efficacy and provide opportunities for behavioral rehearsal of cancer-related disclosures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
期刊最新文献
Communication Interventions Targeting Both Patients and Clinicians in Oncology: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Patient and Caregiver Education to Support Self-Efficacy and Self-Management During Immunotherapy-An Integrative Review. Psycho-Oncological Issues in a Pediatric Sample: Two Years Follow-Up Data of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry. It is Time to Address Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Family Caregivers: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Randomized Pilot Study of the Family Caregiver Version of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FC-FORT). A Systematic Review of Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening, and of Interventions Designed to Increase Participation, Among Women of Black African and Black Caribbean Descent in the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1