A United Kingdom nationally representative survey of public attitudes towards pharmacogenomics.

IF 6.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL QJM: An International Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcaf035
Emma F Magavern, Gabriel Marengo, Chujan Sivathasan, Marta Mezzanzanica, Alison J Wright, Jessica Keen, Videha Sharma, John H McDermott, Claire Duckett, Dave McCormick, Shelley Simmonds, Emma Walters, John Weinman, Vivienne Parry, William G Newman, Mark J Caulfield
{"title":"A United Kingdom nationally representative survey of public attitudes towards pharmacogenomics.","authors":"Emma F Magavern, Gabriel Marengo, Chujan Sivathasan, Marta Mezzanzanica, Alison J Wright, Jessica Keen, Videha Sharma, John H McDermott, Claire Duckett, Dave McCormick, Shelley Simmonds, Emma Walters, John Weinman, Vivienne Parry, William G Newman, Mark J Caulfield","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variation in DNA is known to contribute to medication response, impacting both medicine effectiveness and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has been slow, and the views of the public are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess UK national public attitudes around pharmacogenetics.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>The survey was co-designed with the Participant Panel at Genomics England and the data were collected by the National Centre for Social Research, using its nationally representative panel of UK adults. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyse relationships between selected survey reported variables, controlled for age and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 58%. Two thousand seven hundred and nineteen responses were obtained. Most respondents (59%) had experienced either no benefit or a side effect. Forty-five per cent of respondents reported having experienced no benefit and 46% of respondents reported having experienced a side effect, with female respondents more likely to be in both groups (P < 0.0001). Despite variability in interindividual medicine response being well understood (89%), the involvement of DNA in predicting benefit or risk of a side effect is not (understood by 52% and 48%, respectively). Eighty-nine per cent would complete a PGx test, with 91% wanting direct access to this information. Eighty-five per cent of UK adults think that the NHS should offer PGx to those regularly taking many medicines. Respondents were not more worried overall about misuse of PGx data compared with other routine medical data. Experience with prescription medication impacted on views with those who were prescribed medication almost twice as likely to want a PGx test for any reason.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents reported experience with either a medication not working for them or ADRs. There was a high level of understanding of variable medication response but a relatively low level of awareness of the role genetics plays in that variability. Most respondents would want a PGx test, to have direct access to results, and think the NHS should offer this form of testing. Importantly, respondents were not more concerned about PGx data use than that of any other routinely generated medical data. Notably, this study highlights a relationship between individuals' experiences with prescription medications and their interest in PGx testing, underscoring the potential for personalized medicine to address public healthcare needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"423-433"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Variation in DNA is known to contribute to medication response, impacting both medicine effectiveness and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has been slow, and the views of the public are not well understood.

Aim: To assess UK national public attitudes around pharmacogenetics.

Design and methods: The survey was co-designed with the Participant Panel at Genomics England and the data were collected by the National Centre for Social Research, using its nationally representative panel of UK adults. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyse relationships between selected survey reported variables, controlled for age and sex.

Results: The survey response rate was 58%. Two thousand seven hundred and nineteen responses were obtained. Most respondents (59%) had experienced either no benefit or a side effect. Forty-five per cent of respondents reported having experienced no benefit and 46% of respondents reported having experienced a side effect, with female respondents more likely to be in both groups (P < 0.0001). Despite variability in interindividual medicine response being well understood (89%), the involvement of DNA in predicting benefit or risk of a side effect is not (understood by 52% and 48%, respectively). Eighty-nine per cent would complete a PGx test, with 91% wanting direct access to this information. Eighty-five per cent of UK adults think that the NHS should offer PGx to those regularly taking many medicines. Respondents were not more worried overall about misuse of PGx data compared with other routine medical data. Experience with prescription medication impacted on views with those who were prescribed medication almost twice as likely to want a PGx test for any reason.

Conclusion: Most respondents reported experience with either a medication not working for them or ADRs. There was a high level of understanding of variable medication response but a relatively low level of awareness of the role genetics plays in that variability. Most respondents would want a PGx test, to have direct access to results, and think the NHS should offer this form of testing. Importantly, respondents were not more concerned about PGx data use than that of any other routinely generated medical data. Notably, this study highlights a relationship between individuals' experiences with prescription medications and their interest in PGx testing, underscoring the potential for personalized medicine to address public healthcare needs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于公众对药物基因组学态度的英国全国代表性调查。
背景:DNA的变异与药物反应有关,影响药物的有效性和药物不良反应(adr)的发生率。然而,药物基因组学(PGx)的临床实施进展缓慢,公众的意见也不太清楚。目的:评估英国公众对药物遗传学的态度。设计和方法:该调查是与英国基因组学公司的参与者小组共同设计的,数据由国家社会研究中心收集,使用了具有全国代表性的英国成年人小组。多变量逻辑回归分析用于分析选定的调查报告变量之间的关系,控制年龄和性别。结果:调查回复率为58%。共收到27199份回复。大多数受访者(59%)要么没有受益,要么没有副作用。45%的受访者报告没有获益,46%的受访者报告有副作用,女性受访者更有可能属于这两组(P结论:大多数受访者报告有药物不起作用或不良反应的经历。人们对药物反应的变化有很高的理解,但对遗传在这种变化中所起的作用的认识相对较低。大多数受访者希望进行PGx测试,以便直接获得结果,并认为NHS应该提供这种形式的测试。重要的是,受访者并不比其他常规生成的医疗数据更关心PGx数据的使用。值得注意的是,这项研究强调了个人使用处方药的经历与他们对PGx检测的兴趣之间的关系,强调了个性化医疗解决公共医疗需求的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
263
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles. Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence. In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.
期刊最新文献
Reply to letter to the editor Reassessing Ménétrier's disease: diagnostic variability, molecular subtypes, and implications for precision therapy. Dyskeratosis Congenita Due to a de novo TINF2 Mutation. A Tiger in Sheep's Clothing: When the Tiger-Man Sign is Not Sarcoidosis. Lifestyles, leisure activities, subjective well-being, and long-term survival after age 80 in China: a population-based cohort study. ChatGPT Health-your 'doctor' in your pocket, or is it?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1