An Evaluation of the Decline in Primary Care Physician Visits, 2010 to 2021.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Primary Care and Community Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21501319251321618
Anuradha Jetty, Marie Ezran, Alison N Huffstetler, Yalda Jabbarpour
{"title":"An Evaluation of the Decline in Primary Care Physician Visits, 2010 to 2021.","authors":"Anuradha Jetty, Marie Ezran, Alison N Huffstetler, Yalda Jabbarpour","doi":"10.1177/21501319251321618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary care is the backbone of the United States healthcare system, yet it continues to be underfunded and inaccessible to many. Previous studies explored primary care visit patterns until 2016, leaving gaps in our understanding of how recent factors like state Medicaid expansions, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and population growth have influenced these patterns. Hence, the objective of the current study was to analyze the trends in primary care visits provided by outpatient clinicians over time and by visit type and contextualize study findings within the changing healthcare landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2010-2021) were used to examine trends in the total number and share of ambulatory, preventive, acute, and chronic care visits and investigate sociodemographic factors associated with a given clinician visit. The outcome variable was the clinician type: Primary Care Physicians (PCPs), Internal Medicine (IM) subspecialists, and Nurse Practitioners or Physician Assistants or Registered Nurses (NP/PA/RNs). Explanatory variables included gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, region of respondent's residence, income-to-poverty ratio, insurance coverage, number of chronic conditions, and survey year. Univariate, bivariate, and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visits led by PCPs and IM subspecialists declined by 43% and 23% between 2010 and 2021, respectively. However, visits led by NP/PA/RNs increased by 98%. From 2010 to 2021, the proportion of preventive care visits provided by PCPs, IMs, and NP/PA/RNs increased by 25%, 7%, and 4%, respectively. PCPs provided fewer acute and chronic care visits in 2021 than in 2010. Regression analyses illustrated that relative to Non-Hispanic White patients, non-White patients had a higher likelihood of seeing PCPs. Patients reporting 1 chronic condition were more likely to obtain care from an IM or NP/PA/RN than a PCP. In contrast, those with 2 or more chronic conditions had a greater propensity to see PCP than NP/PA/RN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a growing need for primary care services, the decrease in visits to PCPs is concerning and requires further examination. The declining trends in acute and chronic care visits raise questions as to whether primary care, in its current form, can continue to provide its essential attributes and services.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251321618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251321618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary care is the backbone of the United States healthcare system, yet it continues to be underfunded and inaccessible to many. Previous studies explored primary care visit patterns until 2016, leaving gaps in our understanding of how recent factors like state Medicaid expansions, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and population growth have influenced these patterns. Hence, the objective of the current study was to analyze the trends in primary care visits provided by outpatient clinicians over time and by visit type and contextualize study findings within the changing healthcare landscape.

Methods: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2010-2021) were used to examine trends in the total number and share of ambulatory, preventive, acute, and chronic care visits and investigate sociodemographic factors associated with a given clinician visit. The outcome variable was the clinician type: Primary Care Physicians (PCPs), Internal Medicine (IM) subspecialists, and Nurse Practitioners or Physician Assistants or Registered Nurses (NP/PA/RNs). Explanatory variables included gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, region of respondent's residence, income-to-poverty ratio, insurance coverage, number of chronic conditions, and survey year. Univariate, bivariate, and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: The visits led by PCPs and IM subspecialists declined by 43% and 23% between 2010 and 2021, respectively. However, visits led by NP/PA/RNs increased by 98%. From 2010 to 2021, the proportion of preventive care visits provided by PCPs, IMs, and NP/PA/RNs increased by 25%, 7%, and 4%, respectively. PCPs provided fewer acute and chronic care visits in 2021 than in 2010. Regression analyses illustrated that relative to Non-Hispanic White patients, non-White patients had a higher likelihood of seeing PCPs. Patients reporting 1 chronic condition were more likely to obtain care from an IM or NP/PA/RN than a PCP. In contrast, those with 2 or more chronic conditions had a greater propensity to see PCP than NP/PA/RN.

Conclusion: Despite a growing need for primary care services, the decrease in visits to PCPs is concerning and requires further examination. The declining trends in acute and chronic care visits raise questions as to whether primary care, in its current form, can continue to provide its essential attributes and services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Providers' Beliefs and Values: Understanding Their Approach to Gender-Affirming Care. A Social Network Lens to Community Health Worker Influence and Impact. Integrated Care for People Living With Rare Disease: A Scoping Review on Primary Care Models in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries. Integrating Ambulatory Care Pharmacists Into Value-Based Primary Care: A Scalable Solution to Chronic Disease. Community-Partnered Training in Trauma-Informed Primary Care for Patients Experiencing Reentry From Incarceration: A Pilot Training Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1