[Study on assessment methods for acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty].

Jinzi Wang, Wenju Chang, Pei Zhang, Xiang Li, Yong Zhang, Shuoshuo Zhang, Hai Ding
{"title":"[Study on assessment methods for acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty].","authors":"Jinzi Wang, Wenju Chang, Pei Zhang, Xiang Li, Yong Zhang, Shuoshuo Zhang, Hai Ding","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202411005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate precise assessment methods for predicting the optimal acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 73 patients (80 hips) who underwent primary THA between December 2022 and July 2024 and met the inclusion criteria was analyzed. There were 39 males and 34 females with an average age of 66.3 years (range, 56-78 years). Among them, 66 cases were unilateral THA and 7 were bilateral THAs. There were 29 patients (34 hips) of osteoarthritis, 35 patients (35 hips) of femoral neck fractures, and 9 patients (11 hips) of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Based on anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, three methods were employed to predict acetabular cup size, including preoperative template planning, radiographic femoral head diameter (FHD) measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement. The predicted acetabular cup sizes from these methods were compared with the actual implanted sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predicted acetabular cup sizes using the preoperative template planning, radiographic FHD measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement were (51.25±2.81), (49.72±3.11), and (49.90±2.74) mm, respectively, compared to the actual implanted cup size of (50.57±2.74) mm, with no significant difference ( <i>P</i>>0.05). Regarding agreement with the actual implanted cup size, the preoperative template planning achieved exact matches in 35 hips (43.75%), one-size deviation in 41 hips (51.25%), and two-size deviations in 4 hips (5%); the radiographic FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 12 hips (15%), one-size deviation in 57 hips (71.25%), and two-size deviations in 11 hips (13.75%); and the intraoperative FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 26 hips (32.5%), one-size deviation in 52 hips (65%), and two-size deviations in 2 hips (2.5%). There were significant differences in agreement distributions between the three methods and the actual implanted cup sizes ( <i>H</i>=18.579, <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intraoperative FHD measurement, as a simple, cost-effective, and accurate method, effectively guides acetabular cup selection, reduces the risk of prosthesis wear, enhances postoperative joint stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 2","pages":"163-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202411005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate precise assessment methods for predicting the optimal acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: A clinical data of 73 patients (80 hips) who underwent primary THA between December 2022 and July 2024 and met the inclusion criteria was analyzed. There were 39 males and 34 females with an average age of 66.3 years (range, 56-78 years). Among them, 66 cases were unilateral THA and 7 were bilateral THAs. There were 29 patients (34 hips) of osteoarthritis, 35 patients (35 hips) of femoral neck fractures, and 9 patients (11 hips) of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Based on anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, three methods were employed to predict acetabular cup size, including preoperative template planning, radiographic femoral head diameter (FHD) measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement. The predicted acetabular cup sizes from these methods were compared with the actual implanted sizes.

Results: The predicted acetabular cup sizes using the preoperative template planning, radiographic FHD measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement were (51.25±2.81), (49.72±3.11), and (49.90±2.74) mm, respectively, compared to the actual implanted cup size of (50.57±2.74) mm, with no significant difference ( P>0.05). Regarding agreement with the actual implanted cup size, the preoperative template planning achieved exact matches in 35 hips (43.75%), one-size deviation in 41 hips (51.25%), and two-size deviations in 4 hips (5%); the radiographic FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 12 hips (15%), one-size deviation in 57 hips (71.25%), and two-size deviations in 11 hips (13.75%); and the intraoperative FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 26 hips (32.5%), one-size deviation in 52 hips (65%), and two-size deviations in 2 hips (2.5%). There were significant differences in agreement distributions between the three methods and the actual implanted cup sizes ( H=18.579, P<0.001).

Conclusion: The intraoperative FHD measurement, as a simple, cost-effective, and accurate method, effectively guides acetabular cup selection, reduces the risk of prosthesis wear, enhances postoperative joint stability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯大小评估方法的研究。
目的:探讨预测全髋关节置换术髋臼杯最佳尺寸的精确评估方法。方法:分析2022年12月至2024年7月期间73例(80髋)行原发性全髋关节置换术的临床资料,符合纳入标准。男性39例,女性34例,平均年龄66.3岁(56 ~ 78岁)。其中单侧THA 66例,双侧THA 7例。骨关节炎29例(34髋),股骨颈骨折35例(35髋),股骨头坏死9例(11髋)。基于骨盆正位x线片,采用三种方法预测髋臼杯大小:术前模板规划、x线测量股骨头直径(FHD)和术中测量股骨头直径(FHD)。将这些方法预测的髋臼杯大小与实际植入的大小进行比较。结果:术前模板规划、x线FHD测量、术中FHD测量预测髋臼杯径分别为(51.25±2.81)、(49.72±3.11)、(49.90±2.74)mm,与实际植入髋臼杯径(50.57±2.74)mm比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在与实际植入罩杯的吻合度方面,术前模板规划完全吻合35髋(43.75%),一尺寸偏差41髋(51.25%),两尺寸偏差4髋(5%);x线FHD测量精确匹配的有12髋(15%),1个尺寸偏差的有57髋(71.25%),2个尺寸偏差的有11髋(13.75%);术中FHD测量有26个髋部(32.5%)完全匹配,52个髋部(65%)有一个尺寸偏差,2个髋部(2.5%)有两个尺寸偏差。三种方法与实际植入杯型的一致性分布差异有统计学意义(H=18.579, p)。结论术中FHD测量是一种简单、经济、准确的方法,可有效指导髋臼杯的选择,降低假体磨损风险,增强术后关节稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[A study of burden of gout disease in adults attributable to high body mass index and impaired kidney function in China from 1990 to 2023]. [Advances in application of hydrogels for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head]. [Analysis of current status and trends of disease burden of neck pain in China from 1990 to 2023]. [Analysis of disease burden of fall-related fractures among elderly Chinese from 1990 to 2023]. [Analysis of disease burden, attributable risk factors of low back pain in China from 1990 to 2023 and prediction for 2030].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1