Transportation Barriers and Diabetes Outcomes: A Longitudinal Analysis.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Primary Care and Community Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21501319251320709
Seth A Berkowitz, Aileen Ochoa, Myklynn LaPoint, Marlena L Kuhn, Jenine Dankovchik, Jenna M Donovan, Mufeng Gao, Sanjay Basu, Michael G Hudgens, Rachel Gold
{"title":"Transportation Barriers and Diabetes Outcomes: A Longitudinal Analysis.","authors":"Seth A Berkowitz, Aileen Ochoa, Myklynn LaPoint, Marlena L Kuhn, Jenine Dankovchik, Jenna M Donovan, Mufeng Gao, Sanjay Basu, Michael G Hudgens, Rachel Gold","doi":"10.1177/21501319251320709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate associations between transportation barriers and diabetes outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study; 86 977 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in community-based health centers were assessed for transportation barriers, with up to 36 months of follow-up after initial assessment. We compared scenarios in which individuals did not experience transportation barriers to scenarios in which they did, to estimate differences in mean hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), and LDL cholesterol. For analysis, we used targeted minimum loss estimation at the following timepoints after initial transportation barrier assessment: 12 (primary), 6, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. The study period was June 24, 2016 to April 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We estimated that if participants did not experience transportation barriers, mean HbA1c would have been 0.09% lower (95% CI = -0.14% to -0.04%, <i>P</i> = .0002) at 12 months, compared to a scenario in which they did experience transportation barriers. These results were similar at other time points. We also estimated that absence of transportation barriers was associated with, at 12 months, lower SBP (-0.6mm Hg, 95% CI = -1.0mm Hg to -0.2mm Hg, <i>P</i> = .004) and DBP (-0.3mm Hg, 95% CI = -0.5mm Hg to -0.1mm Hg, <i>P</i> = .02), but not LDL (-1.1mg/dL, 95% CI = -2.6 mg/dL to 0.5 mg/dL, <i>P</i> = .19). Results at other time points for SBP, DBP, and LDL outcomes were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absence of transportation barriers was associated with slightly lower hemoglobin A1c and blood pressure, but the small magnitude of the differences suggests that also addressing other factors may be needed to improve diabetes outcomes more meaningfully.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251320709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251320709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate associations between transportation barriers and diabetes outcomes.

Methods: Longitudinal cohort study; 86 977 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in community-based health centers were assessed for transportation barriers, with up to 36 months of follow-up after initial assessment. We compared scenarios in which individuals did not experience transportation barriers to scenarios in which they did, to estimate differences in mean hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), and LDL cholesterol. For analysis, we used targeted minimum loss estimation at the following timepoints after initial transportation barrier assessment: 12 (primary), 6, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. The study period was June 24, 2016 to April 30, 2023.

Results: We estimated that if participants did not experience transportation barriers, mean HbA1c would have been 0.09% lower (95% CI = -0.14% to -0.04%, P = .0002) at 12 months, compared to a scenario in which they did experience transportation barriers. These results were similar at other time points. We also estimated that absence of transportation barriers was associated with, at 12 months, lower SBP (-0.6mm Hg, 95% CI = -1.0mm Hg to -0.2mm Hg, P = .004) and DBP (-0.3mm Hg, 95% CI = -0.5mm Hg to -0.1mm Hg, P = .02), but not LDL (-1.1mg/dL, 95% CI = -2.6 mg/dL to 0.5 mg/dL, P = .19). Results at other time points for SBP, DBP, and LDL outcomes were similar.

Conclusions: Absence of transportation barriers was associated with slightly lower hemoglobin A1c and blood pressure, but the small magnitude of the differences suggests that also addressing other factors may be needed to improve diabetes outcomes more meaningfully.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Providers' Beliefs and Values: Understanding Their Approach to Gender-Affirming Care. A Social Network Lens to Community Health Worker Influence and Impact. Integrated Care for People Living With Rare Disease: A Scoping Review on Primary Care Models in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Countries. Integrating Ambulatory Care Pharmacists Into Value-Based Primary Care: A Scalable Solution to Chronic Disease. Community-Partnered Training in Trauma-Informed Primary Care for Patients Experiencing Reentry From Incarceration: A Pilot Training Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1