Utilitarian psychology and influenza vaccine acceptance in the United Arab Emirates: implications for moral education and public policy.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02456-y
Gabriel Andrade, Khadiga Yasser Abdelraouf Abdelmonem, Hajar Jamal Teir, Nour Alqaderi, Ahmed Banibella Abdelmagied Elamin, Dalia Bedewy
{"title":"Utilitarian psychology and influenza vaccine acceptance in the United Arab Emirates: implications for moral education and public policy.","authors":"Gabriel Andrade, Khadiga Yasser Abdelraouf Abdelmonem, Hajar Jamal Teir, Nour Alqaderi, Ahmed Banibella Abdelmagied Elamin, Dalia Bedewy","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02456-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Seasonal influenza is still a challenge in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). There is consensus that the most effective way to address this problem is through yearly vaccination campaigns. Despite governmental efforts to make the influenza vaccine available, there remains some hesitancy among the population. Previous research has focused on the conspiratorial and disinformation aspects of vaccine hesitancy. In this article, we posit that, apart from those factors, moral psychology considerations also play a role in determining whether people accept the influenza vaccine. University students in the UAE were assessed in their knowledge of how vaccines work. They were also assessed in their level of adherence to utilitarian moral psychology. Results came out showing that while vaccine knowledge plays a role in the decision to receive the seasonal influenza shot, impartial beneficence (as a dimension of utilitarian psychology) plays a greater role. This has implications for moral education, communication and public policy in the UAE, as an introduction to utilitarian principles may serve the purpose of curbing vaccine hesitancy in the nation.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02456-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seasonal influenza is still a challenge in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). There is consensus that the most effective way to address this problem is through yearly vaccination campaigns. Despite governmental efforts to make the influenza vaccine available, there remains some hesitancy among the population. Previous research has focused on the conspiratorial and disinformation aspects of vaccine hesitancy. In this article, we posit that, apart from those factors, moral psychology considerations also play a role in determining whether people accept the influenza vaccine. University students in the UAE were assessed in their knowledge of how vaccines work. They were also assessed in their level of adherence to utilitarian moral psychology. Results came out showing that while vaccine knowledge plays a role in the decision to receive the seasonal influenza shot, impartial beneficence (as a dimension of utilitarian psychology) plays a greater role. This has implications for moral education, communication and public policy in the UAE, as an introduction to utilitarian principles may serve the purpose of curbing vaccine hesitancy in the nation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Messenger-based assessment of empathic accuracy in couples' smartphone communication. Nursing students' attitudes and intentions towards seeking professional psychological help: the mediating role of emotional intelligence. Sex differences in how are mothers' SES related to late adolescents' emotional stability in China: the mediating role of maternal parenting styles. The mechanisms of social network on subjective well-being from a life course perspective: the mediating role of individual resilience. From defensive reasoning to innovation: how digital tools foster positive emotions in organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1