ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1479524
Sarah S Lütke Lanfer, Ruth Pfeifer, Yannik Rieder, Alexander Wünsch, Matthias Braeunig, Claas Lahmann
{"title":"ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers.","authors":"Sarah S Lütke Lanfer, Ruth Pfeifer, Yannik Rieder, Alexander Wünsch, Matthias Braeunig, Claas Lahmann","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1479524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Online formats provide promising and low-threshold options for mental health coaching. However, research on online mental health interventions compared to traditional face-to-face interventions remains scarce. In the present study, the established prevention tool \"<i>Teacher Group-coaching Program</i>\" (TGP) was applied in both the original face-to-face setting as well as online. TGP focuses on promoting mental health in teachers by strengthening relational skills using the Balint group technique. This technique roots back to a psychoanalytic approach to explore the emotional aspects of (stress inducing) professional relationships. The current study aimed at comparing the satisfaction with and effectiveness of TGP between both settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 104 teachers who voluntarily chose between face-to-face (<i>n</i> = 51) and online (<i>n</i> = 53) setting. In a pre-posttest design, participants completed questionnaires before and after the intervention. Additionally participant's satisfaction with the program was assessed during and after TGP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention effects did not differ significantly in terms of mental health, general life satisfaction and emotional distancing between TGP online and face-to-face. In line with previous research, there was a pre-posttest improvement for mental distress and the ability to distance oneself for both groups, which did not differ significantly between face-to-face and online setting. Satisfaction with the program was rated high in both settings, suggesting similar acceptance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although, the absence of an effect is not the evidence of equality of the groups, the present study highlights the potential of online admissions of mental health interventions as possible alternatives and additions to traditional face-to-face programs, especially when in-person meetings are not feasible. Specifically, it shows evidence that the Balint group technique can also be applied successfully by trained experts in the online setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1479524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1479524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Online formats provide promising and low-threshold options for mental health coaching. However, research on online mental health interventions compared to traditional face-to-face interventions remains scarce. In the present study, the established prevention tool "Teacher Group-coaching Program" (TGP) was applied in both the original face-to-face setting as well as online. TGP focuses on promoting mental health in teachers by strengthening relational skills using the Balint group technique. This technique roots back to a psychoanalytic approach to explore the emotional aspects of (stress inducing) professional relationships. The current study aimed at comparing the satisfaction with and effectiveness of TGP between both settings.

Method: The sample consisted of 104 teachers who voluntarily chose between face-to-face (n = 51) and online (n = 53) setting. In a pre-posttest design, participants completed questionnaires before and after the intervention. Additionally participant's satisfaction with the program was assessed during and after TGP.

Results: Intervention effects did not differ significantly in terms of mental health, general life satisfaction and emotional distancing between TGP online and face-to-face. In line with previous research, there was a pre-posttest improvement for mental distress and the ability to distance oneself for both groups, which did not differ significantly between face-to-face and online setting. Satisfaction with the program was rated high in both settings, suggesting similar acceptance.

Discussion: Although, the absence of an effect is not the evidence of equality of the groups, the present study highlights the potential of online admissions of mental health interventions as possible alternatives and additions to traditional face-to-face programs, especially when in-person meetings are not feasible. Specifically, it shows evidence that the Balint group technique can also be applied successfully by trained experts in the online setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线vs.面对面小组辅导促进教师心理健康:对德国教师的探索性实地研究
在线形式为心理健康指导提供了有前途和低门槛的选择。然而,与传统的面对面干预相比,在线心理健康干预的研究仍然很少。在本研究中,已建立的预防工具“教师团体辅导计划”(TGP)在原始的面对面环境和在线环境中都得到了应用。TGP的重点是通过使用Balint小组技术加强关系技能来促进教师的心理健康。这种技术可以追溯到一种精神分析方法,用来探索(压力诱发的)职业关系的情感方面。目前的研究旨在比较两种情况下TGP的满意度和有效性。方法:样本由104名教师组成,他们自愿选择面对面(n = 51)和在线(n = 53)的设置。在前-后测试设计中,参与者在干预前后分别完成问卷调查。此外,在TGP期间和之后评估参与者对该计划的满意度。结果:网络TGP与面对面TGP在心理健康、总体生活满意度和情感距离方面的干预效果无显著差异。与之前的研究一致,两组人在测试前和测试后对精神痛苦和疏远自己的能力都有改善,这在面对面和在线环境之间没有显著差异。在两种情况下,对该计划的满意度都很高,表明接受度相似。讨论:虽然,效果的缺失并不是群体平等的证据,但目前的研究强调了在线心理健康干预的潜力,作为传统面对面项目的可能替代和补充,特别是在面对面会议不可行时。具体来说,它显示了证据表明,巴林特小组技术也可以成功地应用于在线设置训练有素的专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative performance of ChatGPT-5 and DeepSeek on the Chinese ultrasound medicine senior professional title examination. ChatGPT-4o with faculty guidance outperforms AI-only and traditional learning in ultrasonography training: a randomized trial. A professional training simulator for skill acquisition in ultrasound-guided lumbar facet syndrome intervention: design and educational evaluation. The repaired man or the man with extras: medical human-cyborgs. Integrating remote blood pressure monitoring into NHS primary care: a human factors perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1