Commentary for the Special Issue on Innovations and Strategies for Addressing the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Measurement and Methodological Challenges.
{"title":"Commentary for the Special Issue on Innovations and Strategies for Addressing the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus on Measurement and Methodological Challenges.","authors":"Nisha Gottfredson O'Shea","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01792-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary explores challenges and innovations in prevention science that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on measurement issues and the contextual influences on data collection and intervention delivery. The pandemic necessitated a rapid shift to remote data collection and virtual interventions, many of which proved effective and scalable, as demonstrated by studies in this special issue. Innovations such as remote observational assessments improved reliability, reduced costs, and increased accessibility. However, the pandemic also revealed how contextual factors influence measurement properties for key constructs, with examples from this issue showing shifts in scale dimensionality and item functioning over time. These findings underscore the importance of considering context when designing and interpreting quantitative measures. I argue that by embracing heterogeneity in exposures and outcomes, prevention researchers can improve the precision and relevance of their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01792-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This commentary explores challenges and innovations in prevention science that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on measurement issues and the contextual influences on data collection and intervention delivery. The pandemic necessitated a rapid shift to remote data collection and virtual interventions, many of which proved effective and scalable, as demonstrated by studies in this special issue. Innovations such as remote observational assessments improved reliability, reduced costs, and increased accessibility. However, the pandemic also revealed how contextual factors influence measurement properties for key constructs, with examples from this issue showing shifts in scale dimensionality and item functioning over time. These findings underscore the importance of considering context when designing and interpreting quantitative measures. I argue that by embracing heterogeneity in exposures and outcomes, prevention researchers can improve the precision and relevance of their work.
期刊介绍:
Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.