Serial bias and response time: Prior stimulus not only biases but also modulates the speed of decision for a new stimulus.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1167/jov.25.2.9
Gi-Yeul Bae, Kuo-Wei Chen
{"title":"Serial bias and response time: Prior stimulus not only biases but also modulates the speed of decision for a new stimulus.","authors":"Gi-Yeul Bae, Kuo-Wei Chen","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A decade of research has demonstrated that the reported perception of a new stimulus can be biased by task-irrelevant prior stimuli. However, existing studies have primarily focused on explaining the direction and magnitude of this bias effect, often neglecting other relevant aspects of perceptual behavior that may also be influenced by prior stimuli. In this study, we examined how decision speed for a new stimulus might be influenced by prior stimuli in motion-direction estimation tasks. We found that direction reports exhibited a repulsive serial bias along with a systematic response time (RT) effect, where reports were faster when the prior motion direction was more dissimilar to the current motion direction. Follow-up experiments replicated this RT effect and showed that it occurred only when repulsive serial bias was evident. Subsequent analyses revealed that the RT effect was positively correlated with repulsive serial bias, indicating that both effects are driven by common underlying mechanisms. Together, these results demonstrate that prior stimuli not only bias but also modulate response speed to new stimuli, suggesting that existing theories should incorporate decisional mechanisms that influence response speed to fully account for the serial bias phenomenon.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 2","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.2.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A decade of research has demonstrated that the reported perception of a new stimulus can be biased by task-irrelevant prior stimuli. However, existing studies have primarily focused on explaining the direction and magnitude of this bias effect, often neglecting other relevant aspects of perceptual behavior that may also be influenced by prior stimuli. In this study, we examined how decision speed for a new stimulus might be influenced by prior stimuli in motion-direction estimation tasks. We found that direction reports exhibited a repulsive serial bias along with a systematic response time (RT) effect, where reports were faster when the prior motion direction was more dissimilar to the current motion direction. Follow-up experiments replicated this RT effect and showed that it occurred only when repulsive serial bias was evident. Subsequent analyses revealed that the RT effect was positively correlated with repulsive serial bias, indicating that both effects are driven by common underlying mechanisms. Together, these results demonstrate that prior stimuli not only bias but also modulate response speed to new stimuli, suggesting that existing theories should incorporate decisional mechanisms that influence response speed to fully account for the serial bias phenomenon.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
序列偏差和反应时间:先前的刺激不仅会产生偏差,还会调节对新刺激做出决定的速度。
十年来的研究表明,对新刺激的感知可能会受到与任务无关的先前刺激的影响。然而,现有的研究主要集中在解释这种偏见效应的方向和程度上,往往忽略了知觉行为的其他相关方面,这些方面也可能受到先前刺激的影响。在这项研究中,我们研究了在运动方向估计任务中,对新刺激的决策速度如何受到先前刺激的影响。我们发现方向报告表现出排斥序列偏差和系统反应时间(RT)效应,当先前的运动方向与当前的运动方向更不相似时,报告速度更快。后续实验重复了这一RT效应,并表明它仅在排斥性序列偏倚明显时才会发生。随后的分析显示,RT效应与排斥性序列偏倚呈正相关,表明这两种效应是由共同的潜在机制驱动的。综上所述,这些结果表明,先前的刺激不仅会产生偏倚,还会调节对新刺激的反应速度,这表明现有的理论应该纳入影响反应速度的决策机制,以充分解释序列偏倚现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Different effects of flash-grab and frame stimuli on position shift and shape distortion. When sounds control sight: Associative learning modifies perceptual transitions in binocular rivalry. Microsaccadic modulation in goal-directed reaching. Retinal and extra-retinal contributions of blinking to perceptual alternation in bistable apparent motion. Frame effects across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1