The effect of basic psychological needs on healthcare professionals' work-related psychological outcomes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1177/10519815241295906
Eldad Grinberg, Reut Nachoum, Yaniv Kanat-Maymon
{"title":"The effect of basic psychological needs on healthcare professionals' work-related psychological outcomes.","authors":"Eldad Grinberg, Reut Nachoum, Yaniv Kanat-Maymon","doi":"10.1177/10519815241295906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Backgroundself-determination theory (SDT) posits that the satisfaction of the three basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness affects employees' work-related psychological outcomes. Despite the wealth of studies addressing SDT in the workplace domain, little is known of the effect of each basic need to the work-related psychological outcomes of healthcare workers.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relative effect of each basic psychological need to occupational and physical therapists' work-related psychological outcomes.MethodsParticipants were 152 occupational and physical therapists who completed questionnaires tapping basic psychological needs satisfaction, well-being, work meaning, work satisfaction and compassion fatigue. A series of linear regressions were performed.ResultsCompetence, relatedness toward co-workers, and relatedness toward patients were positive predictors of occupational and physical therapists' mental well-being. Autonomy and competence predicted job satisfaction. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness toward patients predicted work meaning. Autonomy and competence were significant negative predictors of compassion fatigue.ConclusionsStudy results demonstrate each basic psychological need makes its own influence to different psychological outcomes, highlighting the importance of supporting all three needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1634-1639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241295906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgroundself-determination theory (SDT) posits that the satisfaction of the three basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness affects employees' work-related psychological outcomes. Despite the wealth of studies addressing SDT in the workplace domain, little is known of the effect of each basic need to the work-related psychological outcomes of healthcare workers.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relative effect of each basic psychological need to occupational and physical therapists' work-related psychological outcomes.MethodsParticipants were 152 occupational and physical therapists who completed questionnaires tapping basic psychological needs satisfaction, well-being, work meaning, work satisfaction and compassion fatigue. A series of linear regressions were performed.ResultsCompetence, relatedness toward co-workers, and relatedness toward patients were positive predictors of occupational and physical therapists' mental well-being. Autonomy and competence predicted job satisfaction. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness toward patients predicted work meaning. Autonomy and competence were significant negative predictors of compassion fatigue.ConclusionsStudy results demonstrate each basic psychological need makes its own influence to different psychological outcomes, highlighting the importance of supporting all three needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基本心理需求对医护人员工作心理结果的影响。
背景:自我决定理论(self-determination theory, SDT)认为自主性、胜任力和亲缘性这三种基本心理需求的满足会影响员工的工作心理结果。尽管在工作场所领域进行了大量关于SDT的研究,但人们对每种基本需求对医护人员工作相关心理结果的影响知之甚少。目的:评价各基本心理需求对职业治疗师和物理治疗师工作心理结局的相对影响。方法:以152名职业治疗师和物理治疗师为调查对象,完成基本心理需求满意度、幸福感、工作意义、工作满意度和同情疲劳问卷。进行了一系列的线性回归。结果:能力、同事关系、患者关系是职业治疗师和物理治疗师心理健康的正向预测因子。自主性和能力预测工作满意度。自主性、能力和对病人的关系预测了工作意义。自主性和胜任力是同情疲劳的显著负向预测因子。结论:研究结果表明,每一种基本心理需求对不同的心理结果都有各自的影响,突出了支持这三种需求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
When daytime classes meet nighttime jobs: The double-edged impact of work-school conflict on music students. Between the greenhouse and the classroom: The struggle of mothers working in rural greenhouse agriculture to access preschool education. Impact of 24-hour shifts on interns' gait: A study on sleep deprivation and rest effects. The effect of life satisfaction on work motivation and organizational commitment in workers after the earthquake. Ergonomic challenges and musculoskeletal disorder among female CNC machine operators in the Indian manufacturing industry: An SDG-aligned approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1