Content validity of the Demand and Ability Protocol - A dialogue tool involving stakeholders in exploring demands and abilities at work.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1177/10519815241300408
Marie-Louise Pauhlson, Teresia Nyman, Magnus Svartengren, Kristina Eliasson, Margareta Torgén, Sofia Paulsson, Therese Hellman
{"title":"Content validity of the Demand and Ability Protocol - A dialogue tool involving stakeholders in exploring demands and abilities at work.","authors":"Marie-Louise Pauhlson, Teresia Nyman, Magnus Svartengren, Kristina Eliasson, Margareta Torgén, Sofia Paulsson, Therese Hellman","doi":"10.1177/10519815241300408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ICF-based Demand and Ability Protocol (DAP) is a dialogue tool to be used when assessing the balance between an employee's functional ability and the demands of their work and as a supportive measure for discussing work ability, workplace adaptations and return to work. The DAP has been used in Sweden since the twenty-first century, however revision nor content validity has not yet been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To update and revise the Demand and Ability Protocol and to assess the content validity of the dialogue tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design was used involving a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 7) and a group of experienced DAP-users (n = 13) who participated in think-aloud interviews. Data were analyzed with thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several significant changes were made to the domains to enhance the clarity and conciseness of the DAP. Some changes in formulations were identified and changed, even though the questions were mostly perceived as clear and relevant. Overall, the DAP can be considered as a dialogue tool with good content validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The revision and validation process of the DAP have clarified the theoretical concepts and their link to the ICF, establishing a strong basis for the dialogue tool's content.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1886-1899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241300408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ICF-based Demand and Ability Protocol (DAP) is a dialogue tool to be used when assessing the balance between an employee's functional ability and the demands of their work and as a supportive measure for discussing work ability, workplace adaptations and return to work. The DAP has been used in Sweden since the twenty-first century, however revision nor content validity has not yet been evaluated.

Objective: To update and revise the Demand and Ability Protocol and to assess the content validity of the dialogue tool.

Methods: A qualitative design was used involving a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 7) and a group of experienced DAP-users (n = 13) who participated in think-aloud interviews. Data were analyzed with thematic analysis.

Results: Several significant changes were made to the domains to enhance the clarity and conciseness of the DAP. Some changes in formulations were identified and changed, even though the questions were mostly perceived as clear and relevant. Overall, the DAP can be considered as a dialogue tool with good content validity.

Conclusion: The revision and validation process of the DAP have clarified the theoretical concepts and their link to the ICF, establishing a strong basis for the dialogue tool's content.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需求和能力协议的内容有效性——一个涉及涉众探索工作中的需求和能力的对话工具。
背景:基于icf的需求和能力协议(DAP)是一种对话工具,用于评估员工的功能能力和工作需求之间的平衡,并作为讨论工作能力,工作场所适应和重返工作的支持性措施。自21世纪以来,DAP一直在瑞典使用,但尚未评估修订或内容效度。目的:更新和修订需求和能力协议,并评估对话工具的内容有效性。方法:采用定性设计,包括多学科专家小组(n = 7)和一组有经验的dap用户(n = 13),他们参加了有声思考访谈。数据采用专题分析法进行分析。结果:对结构域进行了一些显著的改变,增强了DAP的清晰度和简洁性。虽然大多数问题被认为是明确和相关的,但在提法上发现并改变了一些变化。总的来说,DAP可以被认为是一个具有良好内容有效性的对话工具。结论:DAP的修订和验证过程明确了理论概念及其与ICF的联系,为对话工具的内容奠定了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing postural health Among female agricultural workers in rural India: Development and assessment of ergonomic postural guidelines. Anthropometry measurements of farm workers using computer vision-based multiview stereo-image sensing. Are you a supermom? A qualitative assessment of the work-life balance of teachers through the lens of gender discrimination. Factors affecting student nurses' attitudes towards the safe use of sharps. Factors predicting physical readiness towards basic military training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1