Design and validation of a novel ergonomic backpack.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1177/10519815241290644
Lyndsey K Bouve, Denis J DiAngelo
{"title":"Design and validation of a novel ergonomic backpack.","authors":"Lyndsey K Bouve, Denis J DiAngelo","doi":"10.1177/10519815241290644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBP are the most common means for carrying items and are used by a large population but transporting heavy loads (over extended periods of time) can lead to a variety of health-related problems. An ergonomic backpack (EBP) was designed as a potential solution to reduce the incidence of injuries associated with heavy backpack weight.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to design a novel ergonomic offloading backpack that reduced loads on the shoulder and spine compared to a traditional modern day backpack (BP).MethodsStrap tension and shoulder loads were measured in a common two strap style commuter BP and the EBP during quiet (vertical) stance conditions for five weight increments (0 kg to 11 kg) to confirm the offloading capabilities of the EBP. Portable luggage scales were attached directly to the shoulder straps and configured to measure strap tension. Load sensors placed underneath the shoulder straps provided an estimate of the total force acting on the shoulders and transferred to the spine.ResultsThe EBP had a large effect size and significant reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in shoulder loads compared to a traditional BP for all bag weight conditions. Similarly, the EBP had a large effect size in reducing strap tension compared to the traditional modern day two strap BP.ConclusionA newly designed EBP was effective at transferring a significantly large portion of the shoulder and spine loads to the pelvic region.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"860-870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241290644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundBP are the most common means for carrying items and are used by a large population but transporting heavy loads (over extended periods of time) can lead to a variety of health-related problems. An ergonomic backpack (EBP) was designed as a potential solution to reduce the incidence of injuries associated with heavy backpack weight.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to design a novel ergonomic offloading backpack that reduced loads on the shoulder and spine compared to a traditional modern day backpack (BP).MethodsStrap tension and shoulder loads were measured in a common two strap style commuter BP and the EBP during quiet (vertical) stance conditions for five weight increments (0 kg to 11 kg) to confirm the offloading capabilities of the EBP. Portable luggage scales were attached directly to the shoulder straps and configured to measure strap tension. Load sensors placed underneath the shoulder straps provided an estimate of the total force acting on the shoulders and transferred to the spine.ResultsThe EBP had a large effect size and significant reduction (p < 0.05) in shoulder loads compared to a traditional BP for all bag weight conditions. Similarly, the EBP had a large effect size in reducing strap tension compared to the traditional modern day two strap BP.ConclusionA newly designed EBP was effective at transferring a significantly large portion of the shoulder and spine loads to the pelvic region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型人体工程学背包的设计与验证。
背景:BP是携带物品最常见的工具,被大量人群使用,但运输重物(长时间)可能导致各种健康相关问题。人体工程学背包(EBP)被设计为一个潜在的解决方案,以减少与沉重的背包重量相关的伤害发生率。目的:本研究的目的是设计一种新型的符合人体工程学的卸载背包,与传统的现代背包(BP)相比,减轻了肩部和脊柱的负荷。方法:在安静(垂直)站立条件下,在常见的两带式通勤BP和EBP中测量皮带张力和肩部负荷,并进行5次体重增量(0 kg至11 kg),以确认EBP的卸载能力。便携式行李秤直接连接到肩带和配置测量带张力。放置在肩带下面的负荷传感器提供了作用在肩膀上并转移到脊柱上的总力的估计。结果:EBP有很大的效应量和显著的减少(p结论:新设计的EBP可以有效地将很大一部分肩和脊柱负荷转移到骨盆区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
Competitive integrated employment outcomes for transition-aged young adults with cognitive disabilities: Assistive technology and supported employment services. Negotiating precarity - employment experiences of Canadian young adults in social housing. Comparative analysis of lumbar load across delivery truck designs during loading and unloading tasks. Cultural Humility at Work: Lessons from World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) Congress. Occupational Health Management risks due to asbestos among workers in the construction sector, in Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1