Public perception on occupational exposure to air pollution in India.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1177/10519815241305004
Abinaya Sekar, George Kuttiparichel Varghese, Ravi Varma
{"title":"Public perception on occupational exposure to air pollution in India.","authors":"Abinaya Sekar, George Kuttiparichel Varghese, Ravi Varma","doi":"10.1177/10519815241305004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is crucial to understand perceptions on exposure to air pollution for designing targeted interventions, raising awareness, and fostering measures to mitigate occupational health risk and improve the overall health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims at understanding the perception of the practitioners of various occupations vis-à-vis the general public on occupational exposure to air pollution (OEAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The four-step assessment we carried out involved recording perceptions via Google forms and in-person surveys, conducting statistical analyses (descriptive statistics, regression analyses and tests of significance), analyses using Odds Ratio (OR) and comparing the results with risk perception theories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>712 respondents across the country participated in the survey and 57% of them perceived that they work in a moderately healthy environment. Test of significance showed that gender and age do not significantly affect the perception. However, factors like education, income level, locality, and location of the job significantly influenced the perception. Linear regression analysis showed that ambient air quality is a significant predictor of workplace air quality perception. The OR indicated strong dependence of workers' perception on the actual OEAP. Regarding the exposure associated with a profession, the perception of the practitioners of that profession and the public matched for those professions where the exposures were expected to be high but deviated significantly when the profession had relatively lower exposure to pollution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perception of risks compared to actual risks will serve as the foundation for developing awareness and sensitization programmes focused on occupational risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2230-2243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241305004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is crucial to understand perceptions on exposure to air pollution for designing targeted interventions, raising awareness, and fostering measures to mitigate occupational health risk and improve the overall health outcomes.

Objective: This study aims at understanding the perception of the practitioners of various occupations vis-à-vis the general public on occupational exposure to air pollution (OEAP).

Methods: The four-step assessment we carried out involved recording perceptions via Google forms and in-person surveys, conducting statistical analyses (descriptive statistics, regression analyses and tests of significance), analyses using Odds Ratio (OR) and comparing the results with risk perception theories.

Results: 712 respondents across the country participated in the survey and 57% of them perceived that they work in a moderately healthy environment. Test of significance showed that gender and age do not significantly affect the perception. However, factors like education, income level, locality, and location of the job significantly influenced the perception. Linear regression analysis showed that ambient air quality is a significant predictor of workplace air quality perception. The OR indicated strong dependence of workers' perception on the actual OEAP. Regarding the exposure associated with a profession, the perception of the practitioners of that profession and the public matched for those professions where the exposures were expected to be high but deviated significantly when the profession had relatively lower exposure to pollution.

Conclusion: The perception of risks compared to actual risks will serve as the foundation for developing awareness and sensitization programmes focused on occupational risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度公众对职业暴露于空气污染的看法。
背景:了解人们对空气污染暴露的认识,对于设计有针对性的干预措施、提高认识和促进减轻职业健康风险和改善整体健康结果的措施至关重要。目的:本研究旨在了解不同职业的从业人员对-à-vis公众对职业空气污染暴露(OEAP)的看法。方法:通过谷歌表格和现场调查记录感知,进行统计分析(描述性统计、回归分析和显著性检验),使用比值比(OR)进行分析,并将结果与风险感知理论进行比较。结果:全国712名受访者参加了调查,其中57%的人认为他们在一个中等健康的环境中工作。显著性检验表明,性别和年龄对感知的影响不显著。然而,教育程度、收入水平、所在地区和工作地点等因素对这种看法有显著影响。线性回归分析表明,环境空气质量是工作场所空气质量感知的显著预测因子。OR表明员工的感知对实际OEAP有很强的依赖性。就与某一职业有关的接触而言,该职业的从业人员和公众对预期接触量高的职业的看法是一致的,但当该职业接触污染的程度相对较低时,则显著偏离。结论:对风险的感知与实际风险的比较将作为制定职业风险意识和敏感化方案的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
Positive and negative perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Psychometric adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Multi-criteria decision-making for selecting occupational health and safety training methods: An Entropy AHP-VIKOR approach. Analysis of risk factors in occupational injuries among hotel catering workers. Work-life balance and occupational well-being: A validated scale for Sri Lankan bus conductors. Applying evidence-to-decision to construction safety: A review of safety culture evidence in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1