Alejandro Vega, Cindy Wang, Marc Sherwin, Samuel DeMaria
{"title":"The occupational hazards of anesthesiologists: A literature review and evidence-based approach to prevention.","authors":"Alejandro Vega, Cindy Wang, Marc Sherwin, Samuel DeMaria","doi":"10.1177/10519815241306000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAn occupational hazard is any workplace condition that poses a risk to an employee's health. Occupational hazards are ubiquitous in the field of anesthesiology and often go underappreciated. These hazards warrant careful assessment and strategic preventative planning.ObjectiveThis narrative literature review examines the occupational hazards encountered by anesthesiologists and discusses evidence-based techniques to mitigate these risks. Facilitating the health and safety of anesthesia professionals protects not only the providers themselves but also enhances patient care by reducing the possibility of medical errors due to occupational fatigue, stress, and injuries.MethodsA targeted search of PubMed and other databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science) was used to review the literature. Safety standard handbooks by the <i>International Atomic Energy Agency, The Pan American Health Organization</i>, The <i>World Health Organization</i>, and <i>Food and Agriculture of the United Nations,</i> were also consulted to provide the current guidelines for hazards discussed. Articles and information were included if they provided information about the occupational hazards of anesthesiologists or evidence-based prevention techniques for mitigating the hazards.ResultsThe occupational hazards are classified into physical, chemical, and biological categories. Evidence-based preventive measures are proposed and examined for each category.ConclusionThis paper examines the challenges faced by anesthesiologists by categorizing the physical, chemical, and biological occupational hazards. Each identified hazard is accompanied by evidence-based strategies to mitigate its impact. By illuminating these issues, increased awareness among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public can foster a collective effort to improve the safety of the work of anesthesia providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2048-2056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241306000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundAn occupational hazard is any workplace condition that poses a risk to an employee's health. Occupational hazards are ubiquitous in the field of anesthesiology and often go underappreciated. These hazards warrant careful assessment and strategic preventative planning.ObjectiveThis narrative literature review examines the occupational hazards encountered by anesthesiologists and discusses evidence-based techniques to mitigate these risks. Facilitating the health and safety of anesthesia professionals protects not only the providers themselves but also enhances patient care by reducing the possibility of medical errors due to occupational fatigue, stress, and injuries.MethodsA targeted search of PubMed and other databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science) was used to review the literature. Safety standard handbooks by the International Atomic Energy Agency, The Pan American Health Organization, The World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture of the United Nations, were also consulted to provide the current guidelines for hazards discussed. Articles and information were included if they provided information about the occupational hazards of anesthesiologists or evidence-based prevention techniques for mitigating the hazards.ResultsThe occupational hazards are classified into physical, chemical, and biological categories. Evidence-based preventive measures are proposed and examined for each category.ConclusionThis paper examines the challenges faced by anesthesiologists by categorizing the physical, chemical, and biological occupational hazards. Each identified hazard is accompanied by evidence-based strategies to mitigate its impact. By illuminating these issues, increased awareness among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public can foster a collective effort to improve the safety of the work of anesthesia providers.
背景:职业危害是对雇员健康构成风险的任何工作场所条件。职业危害在麻醉学领域是普遍存在的,但往往不被重视。这些危害需要仔细评估和战略性预防计划。目的:本文回顾了麻醉师遇到的职业危害,并讨论了以证据为基础的技术来减轻这些风险。促进麻醉专业人员的健康和安全不仅可以保护提供者本身,还可以通过减少由于职业疲劳、压力和伤害而导致的医疗差错的可能性来提高对患者的护理。方法:检索PubMed等数据库(SCOPUS、Web of Science)进行文献综述。还咨询了国际原子能机构、泛美卫生组织、世界卫生组织和联合国粮食及农业组织的安全标准手册,以便为所讨论的危害提供现行准则。如果文章和信息提供了麻醉医师职业危害的信息或基于证据的减轻危害的预防技术,则纳入。结果:职业病危害分为物理、化学和生物三大类。针对每一类提出并审查了基于证据的预防措施。结论:本文通过对麻醉医师的物理、化学和生物职业危害进行分类,探讨了麻醉医师面临的挑战。每一种确定的危险都附有以证据为基础的减轻其影响的战略。通过阐明这些问题,提高医疗保健专业人员、政策制定者和公众的意识,可以促进集体努力,以提高麻醉提供者工作的安全性。
期刊介绍:
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.