Trends in work-absenteeism and return-to-work among people with spine pain in middle income countries: A need for evidence.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1177/10519815241308804
Rajani Mullerpatan, Kshitija Jadhav
{"title":"Trends in work-absenteeism and return-to-work among people with spine pain in middle income countries: A need for evidence.","authors":"Rajani Mullerpatan, Kshitija Jadhav","doi":"10.1177/10519815241308804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSpine pain is a leading cause of functional disability and work absenteeism globally. Multiple prognostic factors influencing return-to-work(RTW) among people with spine pain are reported from high-income-countries. However, findings from high-income-countries with 16 percent world's population, cannot be extrapolated to low-middle-income countries (LMICs) which constitutes 84 percent world's population. Hence, paucity of evidence from LMICs motivated present literature review.ObjectiveTo study work absenteeism and RTW profile of people with spine pain in LMICs, including intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing RTW and time taken to RTW.MethodsLiterature search in scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane and Google Scholar yielded 3 articles from middle-income countries; including 2 cohort studies and 1cross-sectional study. No study was identified from low-income countries.ResultsReview findings reported cessation of work or work absenteeism due to spine-pain; factors influencing RTW; proportion of people returning to work and period of RTW. Intrinsic factors which influenced work absenteeism and RTW included-age, gender, BMI, stage of spine pain and pain severity. Extrinsic factors were heavy physically demanding occupation, informal employment, compensatory leave and lack of access to rehabilitation services at primary and secondary healthcare levels.ConclusionsScarce evidence on work absenteeism and RTW among people with spine pain is available only from middle-income countries. Trends of work practice underpinned by pain-coping strategies among people with spine pain in LMICs with inadequate access to evidence-based spine-care, out-of-pocket health expenditure and lack of compensation guidelines warrant urgent research attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1983-1989"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815241308804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSpine pain is a leading cause of functional disability and work absenteeism globally. Multiple prognostic factors influencing return-to-work(RTW) among people with spine pain are reported from high-income-countries. However, findings from high-income-countries with 16 percent world's population, cannot be extrapolated to low-middle-income countries (LMICs) which constitutes 84 percent world's population. Hence, paucity of evidence from LMICs motivated present literature review.ObjectiveTo study work absenteeism and RTW profile of people with spine pain in LMICs, including intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing RTW and time taken to RTW.MethodsLiterature search in scientific databases: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane and Google Scholar yielded 3 articles from middle-income countries; including 2 cohort studies and 1cross-sectional study. No study was identified from low-income countries.ResultsReview findings reported cessation of work or work absenteeism due to spine-pain; factors influencing RTW; proportion of people returning to work and period of RTW. Intrinsic factors which influenced work absenteeism and RTW included-age, gender, BMI, stage of spine pain and pain severity. Extrinsic factors were heavy physically demanding occupation, informal employment, compensatory leave and lack of access to rehabilitation services at primary and secondary healthcare levels.ConclusionsScarce evidence on work absenteeism and RTW among people with spine pain is available only from middle-income countries. Trends of work practice underpinned by pain-coping strategies among people with spine pain in LMICs with inadequate access to evidence-based spine-care, out-of-pocket health expenditure and lack of compensation guidelines warrant urgent research attention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中等收入国家脊柱疼痛患者旷工和重返工作的趋势:需要证据。
背景:脊柱疼痛是全球范围内功能性残疾和旷工的主要原因。高收入国家报道了影响脊柱疼痛患者重返工作岗位(RTW)的多种预后因素。然而,来自占世界人口16%的高收入国家的调查结果不能外推到占世界人口84%的中低收入国家。因此,缺乏来自中低收入国家的证据是本文献综述的动机。目的:研究中低收入国家脊柱疼痛患者的旷工情况和腰痛情况,包括影响腰痛的内、外因因素和腰痛所需时间。方法:在PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、Cochrane和谷歌Scholar等科学数据库中检索3篇来自中等收入国家的文献;包括2项队列研究和1项横断面研究。没有来自低收入国家的研究。结果:回顾调查结果报告了因脊柱疼痛而停止工作或旷工;影响RTW的因素;返回工作岗位的人的比例和RTW的时间。影响旷工和RTW的内在因素包括年龄、性别、BMI、脊柱疼痛分期和疼痛严重程度。外部因素是体力要求很高的职业、非正规就业、补偿性休假以及无法获得初级和二级保健级别的康复服务。结论:只有在中等收入国家才有关于脊柱疼痛患者旷工和RTW的证据。低收入中等收入国家脊柱疼痛患者的疼痛应对策略所支持的工作实践趋势,缺乏循证脊柱护理、自费医疗支出和缺乏补偿指南,值得紧急关注研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
期刊最新文献
Interpersonal trust as a mediation of the influence of workplace spirituality and organizational justice on mental health. Development and Psychometric Validation of a Model-Based Questionnaire on Work Stress Management and Safety Behavior in Cement Workers. Ergonomics knowledge, awareness, and behaviors in a clinical setting: Comparison of individuals with musculoskeletal pain and healthy volunteers. Neglected empathy: A study of the mechanisms of social workers' empathic competence on work withdrawal. Organizational ostracism and loneliness: Depressed mood at work as mediator and workplace incivility as moderator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1