[Is cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC adequately funded?]

Can Yurttas, Sarah Kalmbach, Emilia Ansorge, Mohamed Bezmawi, Gunnar Blumenstock, Markus W Löffler, André L Mihaljevic, Christian Ernst, Martin Holderried
{"title":"[Is cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC adequately funded?]","authors":"Can Yurttas, Sarah Kalmbach, Emilia Ansorge, Mohamed Bezmawi, Gunnar Blumenstock, Markus W Löffler, André L Mihaljevic, Christian Ernst, Martin Holderried","doi":"10.1007/s00104-025-02246-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a treatment concept for highly selected patients with peritoneal metastases and primary tumors (PMT). A challenge from the perspective of hospitals is the cost intensity of this promising multimodal treatment option.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Which factors influence the cost and revenue structure of CRS/HIPEC treatment in the current diagnosis-related group (DRG) system according to § 17b of the German Hospital Financing Act (KHG)?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The database for this analysis was constituted by all patients treated with combined CRS/HIPEC at a certified tumor center between 2017 and 2021. The statistical analysis performed was descriptive, using two-sample and multisample comparisons (ANOVA) as well as linear correlation and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total length of hospitalization for 173 patients was on average 16.1 days and the average length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2.2 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 110 (63.6%) patients. The average DRG revenue obtained was € 21,658.48. The total costs for the combined CRS/HIPC treatment amounted to an average of € 23,764.77 and were therefore on average € 2106.29 (8.86%) higher than the DRG revenue granted for the treatment. The length of stay in the intensive care unit and the total length of hospitalization correlated positively with the treatment costs and DRG revenue.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study presents key factors influencing the cost and revenue structure of CRS/HIPEC and illustrates that this promising surgical treatment approach is relevantly underfunded by the German DRG system. A reform of the current DRG system with special consideration of highly complex oncological treatment concepts is therefore recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-025-02246-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a treatment concept for highly selected patients with peritoneal metastases and primary tumors (PMT). A challenge from the perspective of hospitals is the cost intensity of this promising multimodal treatment option.

Research question: Which factors influence the cost and revenue structure of CRS/HIPEC treatment in the current diagnosis-related group (DRG) system according to § 17b of the German Hospital Financing Act (KHG)?

Material and methods: The database for this analysis was constituted by all patients treated with combined CRS/HIPEC at a certified tumor center between 2017 and 2021. The statistical analysis performed was descriptive, using two-sample and multisample comparisons (ANOVA) as well as linear correlation and regression analyses.

Results: The total length of hospitalization for 173 patients was on average 16.1 days and the average length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2.2 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 110 (63.6%) patients. The average DRG revenue obtained was € 21,658.48. The total costs for the combined CRS/HIPC treatment amounted to an average of € 23,764.77 and were therefore on average € 2106.29 (8.86%) higher than the DRG revenue granted for the treatment. The length of stay in the intensive care unit and the total length of hospitalization correlated positively with the treatment costs and DRG revenue.

Discussion: This study presents key factors influencing the cost and revenue structure of CRS/HIPEC and illustrates that this promising surgical treatment approach is relevantly underfunded by the German DRG system. A reform of the current DRG system with special consideration of highly complex oncological treatment concepts is therefore recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:细胞切除手术后腹腔内热化疗(CRS/HIPEC)是一种治疗理念,适用于经过严格筛选的腹膜转移瘤和原发性肿瘤(PMT)患者。从医院的角度来看,这一前景广阔的多模式治疗方案的成本强度是一个挑战:研究问题:根据《德国医院融资法》(KHG)第 17b 条,在当前的诊断相关组(DRG)系统中,哪些因素会影响 CRS/HIPEC 治疗的成本和收入结构?本次分析的数据库由2017年至2021年间在认证肿瘤中心接受CRS/HIPEC联合治疗的所有患者构成。所进行的统计分析为描述性分析,使用了双样本和多样本比较(方差分析)以及线性相关和回归分析:173名患者的总住院时间平均为16.1天,在重症监护室的平均住院时间为2.2天。110名患者(63.6%)出现了术后并发症。DRG 平均收入为 21,658.48 欧元。CRS/HIPC联合治疗的总费用平均为23764.77欧元,因此平均比DRG治疗收入高出2106.29欧元(8.86%)。重症监护室的住院时间和总住院时间与治疗费用和 DRG 收入呈正相关:本研究介绍了影响 CRS/HIPEC 成本和收入结构的关键因素,并说明德国 DRG 系统对这种前景广阔的外科治疗方法的资助严重不足。因此,建议改革现行的 DRG 系统,特别考虑高度复杂的肿瘤治疗概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Frozen sections in hepatobiliary surgery]. [Perioperative chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer-Results of the ESOPEC trial]. [Relevance of frozen section diagnostics in pancreatic surgery]. [Reinforced fascial suture after midline laparotomy-The Rein4CeTo1 trial]. [Prevention and treatment of surgical site infections in abdominal surgery].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1