Ultrasound-based radiomics and clinical factors-based nomogram for early intracranial hypertension detection in patients with decompressive craniotomy.

IF 3.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Frontiers in medical technology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2025.1485244
Zunfeng Fu, Lin Peng, Laicai Guo, Chao Qin, Yanhong Yu, Jiajun Zhang, Yan Liu
{"title":"Ultrasound-based radiomics and clinical factors-based nomogram for early intracranial hypertension detection in patients with decompressive craniotomy.","authors":"Zunfeng Fu, Lin Peng, Laicai Guo, Chao Qin, Yanhong Yu, Jiajun Zhang, Yan Liu","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2025.1485244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram that combines traditional ultrasound radiomics features with clinical parameters to assess early intracranial hypertension (IH) following primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study incorporates the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method to interpret the radiomics model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 199 patients with severe TBI (training cohort: <i>n</i> = 159; testing cohort: <i>n</i> = 40). Postoperative ultrasound images of the optic nerve sheath (ONS) were obtained at 6 and 18 h after DC. Based on invasive intracranial pressure (ICPi) measurements, patients were grouped according to threshold values of 15 mmHg and 20 mmHg. Radiomics features were extracted from ONS images, and feature selection methods were applied to construct predictive models using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Clinical-ultrasound variables were incorporated into the model through univariate and multivariate logistic regression. A combined nomogram was developed by integrating radiomics features with clinical-ultrasound variables, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). The SHAP method was adopted to explain the prediction models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the machine learning models, the LR model demonstrated superior predictive efficiency and robustness at threshold values of 15 mmHg and 20 mmHg. At a threshold of 20 mmHg, the AUC values for the training and testing cohorts were 0.803 and 0.735 for the clinical model, 0.908 and 0.891 for the radiomics model, and 0.918 and 0.902 for the nomogram model, respectively. Similarly, at a threshold of 15 mmHg, the AUC values were consistent across models: 0.803 and 0.735 for the clinical model, 0.908 and 0.891 for the radiomics model, and 0.918 and 0.902 for the nomogram model. Notably, the nomogram model outperformed the clinical model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed a higher net benefit for predicting intracranial hypertension across all models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nomogram model, which integrates both clinical-semantic and radiomics features, demonstrated strong performance in predicting intracranial hypertension across different threshold values. It shows promise for enhancing non-invasive ICP monitoring and supporting individualized therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1485244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2025.1485244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram that combines traditional ultrasound radiomics features with clinical parameters to assess early intracranial hypertension (IH) following primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study incorporates the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method to interpret the radiomics model.

Methods: This study included 199 patients with severe TBI (training cohort: n = 159; testing cohort: n = 40). Postoperative ultrasound images of the optic nerve sheath (ONS) were obtained at 6 and 18 h after DC. Based on invasive intracranial pressure (ICPi) measurements, patients were grouped according to threshold values of 15 mmHg and 20 mmHg. Radiomics features were extracted from ONS images, and feature selection methods were applied to construct predictive models using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Clinical-ultrasound variables were incorporated into the model through univariate and multivariate logistic regression. A combined nomogram was developed by integrating radiomics features with clinical-ultrasound variables, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). The SHAP method was adopted to explain the prediction models.

Results: Among the machine learning models, the LR model demonstrated superior predictive efficiency and robustness at threshold values of 15 mmHg and 20 mmHg. At a threshold of 20 mmHg, the AUC values for the training and testing cohorts were 0.803 and 0.735 for the clinical model, 0.908 and 0.891 for the radiomics model, and 0.918 and 0.902 for the nomogram model, respectively. Similarly, at a threshold of 15 mmHg, the AUC values were consistent across models: 0.803 and 0.735 for the clinical model, 0.908 and 0.891 for the radiomics model, and 0.918 and 0.902 for the nomogram model. Notably, the nomogram model outperformed the clinical model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed a higher net benefit for predicting intracranial hypertension across all models.

Conclusion: The nomogram model, which integrates both clinical-semantic and radiomics features, demonstrated strong performance in predicting intracranial hypertension across different threshold values. It shows promise for enhancing non-invasive ICP monitoring and supporting individualized therapeutic strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声放射组学和临床因素图在开颅减压术患者早期颅内高压检测中的应用。
目的:本研究旨在开发并验证一种结合传统超声放射组学特征和临床参数的nomogram影像学方法,以评估重型颅脑损伤(TBI)患者原发性减压颅骨切除术(DC)后的早期颅内高压(IH)。该研究采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)方法来解释放射组学模型。方法:本研究纳入199例重型脑外伤患者(训练队列:n = 159;测试队列:n = 40)。术后6 h和18 h视神经鞘超声图像。根据侵入性颅内压(ICPi)测量,根据阈值15 mmHg和20 mmHg对患者进行分组。从ONS图像中提取放射组学特征,并应用特征选择方法构建基于逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和k近邻(KNN)的预测模型。通过单因素和多因素logistic回归将临床超声变量纳入模型。将放射组学特征与临床超声变量相结合,建立了一种组合nomogram,并利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)对其诊断性能进行评价。采用SHAP方法对预测模型进行解释。结果:在机器学习模型中,LR模型在15mmhg和20mmhg阈值下表现出优越的预测效率和鲁棒性。在20 mmHg阈值下,临床模型训练组和测试组的AUC值分别为0.803和0.735,放射组学模型为0.908和0.891,nomogram模型为0.918和0.902。同样,在阈值为15 mmHg时,各模型的AUC值是一致的:临床模型为0.803和0.735,放射组学模型为0.908和0.891,nomogram模型为0.918和0.902。值得注意的是,nomogram模型优于临床模型。决策曲线分析(DCA)进一步证实,在所有模型中,预测颅内高压的净收益更高。结论:结合临床语义和放射组学特征的nomogram模型在预测不同阈值的颅内高压方面表现出较强的性能。它显示了加强非侵入性ICP监测和支持个性化治疗策略的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Design strategies for flexible core biopsy needles: insights from patent literature. Exploring the treatment of osteomyelitis based on nanozyme-based antibacterial strategies. Dental devices and antimicrobial resistance: challenges, innovations, and regulatory compliances. Mamba-enhanced codebook learning with anatomical constraints for liver and tumor segmentation in 3D CT volumes. Correction: Making the invisible visible: integrated visualization and automated quantification of thrombus deformation during mechanical thrombectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1