Comparison of secondary radiation dose between pencil beam scanning and scattered delivery for proton and VHEE radiotherapy

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/mp.17700
Maria Grazia Ronga, Flavia Gesualdi, Anthony Bonfrate, Annalisa Patriarca, Régis Ferrand, Gilles Créhange, Irène Buvat, Ludovic De Marzi
{"title":"Comparison of secondary radiation dose between pencil beam scanning and scattered delivery for proton and VHEE radiotherapy","authors":"Maria Grazia Ronga,&nbsp;Flavia Gesualdi,&nbsp;Anthony Bonfrate,&nbsp;Annalisa Patriarca,&nbsp;Régis Ferrand,&nbsp;Gilles Créhange,&nbsp;Irène Buvat,&nbsp;Ludovic De Marzi","doi":"10.1002/mp.17700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Very high-energy electrons (VHEEs) in radiotherapy may offer several potential advantages over conventional electron beams and other techniques, for example, the fact that they can be used at ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs), therefore enabling FLASH radiotherapy. However, the production of secondary particles at high energies (50–200 MeV) has yet to be studied in detail for this technique currently under development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this work was to examine the secondary dose produced by VHEEs, with particular emphasis on bremsstrahlung photons and neutrons, for two beam delivery systems (double scattering [DS] and pencil beam scanning [PBS]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The electron, X-ray, and neutron doses arising from two beam delivery systems (DS or PBS) were computed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation)/Geant4 toolkit, and a preliminary assessment of the secondary dose for a clinical VHEE treatment was performed using a whole-body phantom. An evaluation of the secondary dose produced by this preliminary design of a VHEE nozzle set in a clinical proton facility was performed, taking into account realistic PBS or DS nozzle configurations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean doses received by a patient undergoing DS-VHEE irradiation were found to be up to 5.3-fold and 6.8-fold higher for in-field or out-of-field organs for photons and neutrons, respectively, compared to the PBS-VHEE plan. The results for the secondary neutron dose in intracranial treatments also demonstrate the characteristic of VHEE compared to proton beams for reducing the out-of-field secondary neutron dose. The dose to the public area that could be delivered to meet regulatory limits surrounding a possible treatment room in a proton therapy facility was assessed. A regulatory limit of 0.5 µSv/h would give a restriction of 49 and 83 Gy per patient and per fraction for DS and PBS, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This work describes a method to simulate and compare secondary radiation doses resulting from scattered, scanned VHEE or proton therapy treatments. The results indicate that a conventionally shielded proton therapy room results in acceptable public doses for a preliminary VHEE design and could be of interest for radiation protection purposes and for similar setups. Other facilities with differing layouts may, however, lead to different conclusions, requiring further studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 6","pages":"4775-4784"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17700","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Very high-energy electrons (VHEEs) in radiotherapy may offer several potential advantages over conventional electron beams and other techniques, for example, the fact that they can be used at ultra-high dose rates (UHDRs), therefore enabling FLASH radiotherapy. However, the production of secondary particles at high energies (50–200 MeV) has yet to be studied in detail for this technique currently under development.

Purpose

The aim of this work was to examine the secondary dose produced by VHEEs, with particular emphasis on bremsstrahlung photons and neutrons, for two beam delivery systems (double scattering [DS] and pencil beam scanning [PBS]).

Methods

The electron, X-ray, and neutron doses arising from two beam delivery systems (DS or PBS) were computed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation)/Geant4 toolkit, and a preliminary assessment of the secondary dose for a clinical VHEE treatment was performed using a whole-body phantom. An evaluation of the secondary dose produced by this preliminary design of a VHEE nozzle set in a clinical proton facility was performed, taking into account realistic PBS or DS nozzle configurations.

Results

The mean doses received by a patient undergoing DS-VHEE irradiation were found to be up to 5.3-fold and 6.8-fold higher for in-field or out-of-field organs for photons and neutrons, respectively, compared to the PBS-VHEE plan. The results for the secondary neutron dose in intracranial treatments also demonstrate the characteristic of VHEE compared to proton beams for reducing the out-of-field secondary neutron dose. The dose to the public area that could be delivered to meet regulatory limits surrounding a possible treatment room in a proton therapy facility was assessed. A regulatory limit of 0.5 µSv/h would give a restriction of 49 and 83 Gy per patient and per fraction for DS and PBS, respectively.

Conclusions

This work describes a method to simulate and compare secondary radiation doses resulting from scattered, scanned VHEE or proton therapy treatments. The results indicate that a conventionally shielded proton therapy room results in acceptable public doses for a preliminary VHEE design and could be of interest for radiation protection purposes and for similar setups. Other facilities with differing layouts may, however, lead to different conclusions, requiring further studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子与VHEE放射治疗铅笔束扫描与散射放射二次辐射剂量的比较。
背景:高能电子(VHEEs)在放射治疗中可能比传统电子束和其他技术提供几个潜在的优势,例如,它们可以在超高剂量率(uhdr)下使用,因此可以实现FLASH放射治疗。然而,对于目前正在开发的这种技术,高能(50-200 MeV)二次粒子的产生尚未进行详细的研究。目的:本研究的目的是研究两种束流传输系统(双散射[DS]和铅笔束扫描[PBS])中VHEEs产生的二次剂量,特别强调轫致辐射光子和中子。方法:使用TOPAS(粒子模拟工具)/Geant4工具包中的蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟计算两种束流输送系统(DS或PBS)产生的电子、x射线和中子剂量,并使用全身模型对临床VHEE治疗的二次剂量进行初步评估。考虑到实际的PBS或DS喷嘴配置,对临床质子设施中VHEE喷嘴设置的初步设计产生的二次剂量进行了评估。结果:与PBS-VHEE计划相比,接受DS-VHEE照射的患者的场内或场外器官的光子和中子平均剂量分别高出5.3倍和6.8倍。颅内治疗中二次中子剂量的结果也表明,与质子束相比,VHEE具有降低场外二次中子剂量的特点。评估了在质子治疗设施中可能的治疗室周围,可以向公共区域输送的剂量以满足监管限制。0.5 μ Sv/h的监管限值将分别对DS和PBS的每位患者和每个馏分产生49和83 Gy的限制。结论:本工作描述了一种模拟和比较散射、扫描VHEE或质子治疗产生的二次辐射剂量的方法。结果表明,常规屏蔽的质子治疗室在初步的VHEE设计中产生可接受的公众剂量,并且可能对辐射防护目的和类似设置感兴趣。然而,其他布局不同的设施可能会得出不同的结论,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
期刊最新文献
Real-time energy measurement of clinical carbon ion beams using a cross-correlation time-of-flight method with parallel-plate chambers Pushing the limits of spatial resolution in clinical PCD-CT using a dedicated high-resolution convolutional neural network (HR-CNN) Head radiotherapy positioning guidance system based on feature recognition and automatic annotation: Clinical validation and error analysis Independent verification of vendor-issued dosimetric data for 106Ru brachytherapy using diode detectors with traceability to external beam standards for absorbed dose to water Kinetic model of radiochemical oxygen depletion (ROD) in FLASH radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1