Soraia de Camargo Catapan, Hannah Sazon, Sophie Zheng, Victor Gallegos-Rejas, Roshni Mendis, Pedro H. R. Santiago, Jaimon T. Kelly
{"title":"A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare","authors":"Soraia de Camargo Catapan, Hannah Sazon, Sophie Zheng, Victor Gallegos-Rejas, Roshni Mendis, Pedro H. R. Santiago, Jaimon T. Kelly","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the well-documented importance of trust in digital healthcare, its domains are not well-understood, preventing theoretically robust instruments for standardised measurements. We identified instruments measuring trust in digital healthcare, explored definitions, associated factors, and outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature using tailored searches and 49 studies measuring trust in digital healthcare from either consumers’, healthcare professionals’, or both perspectives were included. Trust in digital healthcare is complex and, from a consumers’ perspective, can influence digital healthcare use, adoption, acceptance, and usefulness. Consumers’ trust can be affected by the degree of human interaction in automated interventions, perceived risks, privacy concerns, data accuracy, digital literacy, quality of the digital healthcare intervention, satisfaction, education, and income. Healthcare professionals’ trust is enhanced by education and observing good digital health performance. While studies can benefit from rigorous trust measurements, future efforts should address the need for a theoretical framework for trust in digital healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the well-documented importance of trust in digital healthcare, its domains are not well-understood, preventing theoretically robust instruments for standardised measurements. We identified instruments measuring trust in digital healthcare, explored definitions, associated factors, and outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature using tailored searches and 49 studies measuring trust in digital healthcare from either consumers’, healthcare professionals’, or both perspectives were included. Trust in digital healthcare is complex and, from a consumers’ perspective, can influence digital healthcare use, adoption, acceptance, and usefulness. Consumers’ trust can be affected by the degree of human interaction in automated interventions, perceived risks, privacy concerns, data accuracy, digital literacy, quality of the digital healthcare intervention, satisfaction, education, and income. Healthcare professionals’ trust is enhanced by education and observing good digital health performance. While studies can benefit from rigorous trust measurements, future efforts should address the need for a theoretical framework for trust in digital healthcare.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.