Relaxation of management intensity promotes butterfly communities in mountain grasslands

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111027
Isabelle Arnold, Gaëtan Marchand, Aline Hayoz-Andrey, Alberto Serres-Hänni, Raphaël Arlettaz, Jean-Yves Humbert
{"title":"Relaxation of management intensity promotes butterfly communities in mountain grasslands","authors":"Isabelle Arnold,&nbsp;Gaëtan Marchand,&nbsp;Aline Hayoz-Andrey,&nbsp;Alberto Serres-Hänni,&nbsp;Raphaël Arlettaz,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Humbert","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Semi-natural mountain grasslands are currently threatened by either land abandonment or management intensification, which calls for evidence-based recommendations for sustainable and biodiversity-friendly farming of these valuable biodiversity hotspots in the long run. We investigated the effects of the relaxation of the management intensity on their plant and butterfly communities, via an experimental reduction of fertiliser inputs. In 2019, 13 study sites were selected in the SW Swiss Alps, each including three meadows that had been intensively managed for at least the previous 20 years. Adopting a randomised block design, two out of three meadows per study site were restored by shifting their mode of exploitation towards low-intensity (1/3 of the fertiliser dose applied beforehand) or extensive management (cessation of fertilisation), respectively, while the third continued to be managed intensively, serving as control. After four years (2023), plant species richness had increased by 9.3 % in extensively managed meadows compared to baseline. Yet, butterfly abundance was more than twice greater (112 %) and species richness 81 % higher in extensively managed meadows compared to controls. A higher butterfly abundance and species richness following management relaxation was mostly driven by a decrease in vegetation density and an increase in forb cover. Extensively managed meadows also exhibited higher conservation values, harbouring comparatively more threatened butterfly species, whilst no change was observed in low-intensity meadows. Altogether these results indicate that the butterfly communities of mountain hay meadow respond rapidly and massively to a relaxation of management intensity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"304 ","pages":"Article 111027"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725000643","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Semi-natural mountain grasslands are currently threatened by either land abandonment or management intensification, which calls for evidence-based recommendations for sustainable and biodiversity-friendly farming of these valuable biodiversity hotspots in the long run. We investigated the effects of the relaxation of the management intensity on their plant and butterfly communities, via an experimental reduction of fertiliser inputs. In 2019, 13 study sites were selected in the SW Swiss Alps, each including three meadows that had been intensively managed for at least the previous 20 years. Adopting a randomised block design, two out of three meadows per study site were restored by shifting their mode of exploitation towards low-intensity (1/3 of the fertiliser dose applied beforehand) or extensive management (cessation of fertilisation), respectively, while the third continued to be managed intensively, serving as control. After four years (2023), plant species richness had increased by 9.3 % in extensively managed meadows compared to baseline. Yet, butterfly abundance was more than twice greater (112 %) and species richness 81 % higher in extensively managed meadows compared to controls. A higher butterfly abundance and species richness following management relaxation was mostly driven by a decrease in vegetation density and an increase in forb cover. Extensively managed meadows also exhibited higher conservation values, harbouring comparatively more threatened butterfly species, whilst no change was observed in low-intensity meadows. Altogether these results indicate that the butterfly communities of mountain hay meadow respond rapidly and massively to a relaxation of management intensity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
To preserve, monitor or eradicate: Covert rewilding as an emerging conservation trilemma for wildlife managers Unraveling the non-linear associations between the international legal wildlife trade and biodiversity Relaxation of management intensity promotes butterfly communities in mountain grasslands How much deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa has been caused by mining? Conservation translocation immediately reverses decline in imperiled sage-grouse populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1