“Exploring the Green Frontier within Europe’s Recent Forest Initiatives”

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104242
Agata A. Konczal , Jodie Asselin
{"title":"“Exploring the Green Frontier within Europe’s Recent Forest Initiatives”","authors":"Agata A. Konczal ,&nbsp;Jodie Asselin","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, there has been a global consensus on the urgent need for coordinated efforts to combat forest loss and degradation, given forests’ critical roles in climate change mitigation, biodiversity, and local economies. Major policy initiatives, including the Bonn Challenge, the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, and the European Green Deal, reflect this consensus. However, the development and implementation of forest policies are complex and politically charged, often addressing ’wicked’ problems with diverse actors and conflicting values. The proposed solutions—such as conservation, rewilding, certification, and forest expansion—introduce their own challenges. At the same time, there is growing concern about the commoditization and commercialization of forests, where green initiatives can exacerbate inequalities and facilitate new forms of resource accumulation. This paper introduces the concept of ’green frontiers’ as a lens to better understand patterns and consequences of this new forest dynamic in Europe. Applying critical perspectives typically used for frontier studies in the Global South to the Global North, this paper addresses a gap in literature on frontier-making in Europe while highlighting how environmental discourses are reshaping landscapes and communities, often reflecting historical patterns of dispossession and exploitation. It argues that anthropology and like-minded disciplines that rely on ethnographic and comparative methods, offer valuable perspectives for analyzing this formation of frontiers, and that a coordinated forest anthropology is particularly well suited to trace this shift within communities, as well as the common patterns across nations and regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 104242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a global consensus on the urgent need for coordinated efforts to combat forest loss and degradation, given forests’ critical roles in climate change mitigation, biodiversity, and local economies. Major policy initiatives, including the Bonn Challenge, the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, and the European Green Deal, reflect this consensus. However, the development and implementation of forest policies are complex and politically charged, often addressing ’wicked’ problems with diverse actors and conflicting values. The proposed solutions—such as conservation, rewilding, certification, and forest expansion—introduce their own challenges. At the same time, there is growing concern about the commoditization and commercialization of forests, where green initiatives can exacerbate inequalities and facilitate new forms of resource accumulation. This paper introduces the concept of ’green frontiers’ as a lens to better understand patterns and consequences of this new forest dynamic in Europe. Applying critical perspectives typically used for frontier studies in the Global South to the Global North, this paper addresses a gap in literature on frontier-making in Europe while highlighting how environmental discourses are reshaping landscapes and communities, often reflecting historical patterns of dispossession and exploitation. It argues that anthropology and like-minded disciplines that rely on ethnographic and comparative methods, offer valuable perspectives for analyzing this formation of frontiers, and that a coordinated forest anthropology is particularly well suited to trace this shift within communities, as well as the common patterns across nations and regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“在欧洲最近的森林倡议中探索绿色前沿”
近几十年来,鉴于森林在减缓气候变化、生物多样性和地方经济方面的关键作用,全球一致认为迫切需要协调努力,防止森林损失和退化。“波恩挑战”、“联合国生态系统恢复十年”和“欧洲绿色协议”等重大政策倡议反映了这一共识。然而,森林政策的制定和实施是复杂和充满政治色彩的,往往涉及涉及不同行为者和相互冲突的价值观的“邪恶”问题。提出的解决方案,如保护、放归野生、认证和森林扩张,都带来了自己的挑战。与此同时,人们越来越关注森林的商品化和商业化,因为绿色倡议可能加剧不平等,促进新形式的资源积累。本文介绍了“绿色前沿”的概念,作为更好地理解欧洲这种新森林动态的模式和后果的视角。本文将通常用于全球南方和全球北方前沿研究的批判性观点应用于全球北方,解决了欧洲前沿研究文献中的空白,同时强调了环境话语如何重塑景观和社区,通常反映了剥夺和剥削的历史模式。它认为,人类学和类似的学科依赖于民族志和比较方法,为分析这种边界的形成提供了有价值的视角,而协调的森林人类学特别适合于追踪社区内的这种转变,以及跨越国家和地区的共同模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
‘For two years I have been in this large prison’: Conditional inclusion and refugee mobility in Norway and Germany From denial to dilution: state response to environmental disaster in Peru Decolonising water resource allocations: towards a typology of experiences in small island developing states Crisis, cities, and cuisine: urban governance for gastronomic sector recovery in Porto and João Pessoa “You should be able to eat that meal and feel like someone cares”: Community food carers, good food, and the emergence of food-aid mutualism during Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1