Neurocognitive mechanisms of social scenario imagery generation in individuals with social anxiety

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-04-27 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115488
Mingfan Liu , Guanlai Xiao , Genling Xiong
{"title":"Neurocognitive mechanisms of social scenario imagery generation in individuals with social anxiety","authors":"Mingfan Liu ,&nbsp;Guanlai Xiao ,&nbsp;Genling Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive behavioral theory emphasizes the significant role of mental imagery in the onset and development of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). However, the neural mechanisms underlying the generation of social scenario imagery in individuals with social anxiety remain unclear. In this study, 28 individuals with social anxiety and 31 healthy controls performed a retrospective cue imagery generation task to examine their neural responses. Behavioral results showed that, compared to negative social scenarios, the vividness of positive social scenario imagery was significantly lower in the social anxiety group, while the control group showed no significant difference between the two conditions. Event-related potential (ERP) results revealed that, for the social anxiety group, N170 and LPP amplitudes were significantly larger under the neutral condition compared to the negative condition, whereas the control group exhibited no significant difference between these conditions. Furthermore, the social anxiety group showed significantly larger LPP amplitudes than the control group in both the positive and neutral conditions. These findings provide the first neurophysiological evidence that individuals with social anxiety exhibit processing biases when generating imagery of positive and neutral social scenarios, suggesting heightened neural engagement in these conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"484 ","pages":"Article 115488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825000749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral theory emphasizes the significant role of mental imagery in the onset and development of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). However, the neural mechanisms underlying the generation of social scenario imagery in individuals with social anxiety remain unclear. In this study, 28 individuals with social anxiety and 31 healthy controls performed a retrospective cue imagery generation task to examine their neural responses. Behavioral results showed that, compared to negative social scenarios, the vividness of positive social scenario imagery was significantly lower in the social anxiety group, while the control group showed no significant difference between the two conditions. Event-related potential (ERP) results revealed that, for the social anxiety group, N170 and LPP amplitudes were significantly larger under the neutral condition compared to the negative condition, whereas the control group exhibited no significant difference between these conditions. Furthermore, the social anxiety group showed significantly larger LPP amplitudes than the control group in both the positive and neutral conditions. These findings provide the first neurophysiological evidence that individuals with social anxiety exhibit processing biases when generating imagery of positive and neutral social scenarios, suggesting heightened neural engagement in these conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交焦虑个体社会情景意象生成的神经认知机制
认知行为理论强调心理意象在社交焦虑障碍(Social Anxiety Disorder, SAD)发生和发展中的重要作用。然而,社会焦虑个体产生社会情景意象的神经机制尚不清楚。在这项研究中,28名社交焦虑症患者和31名健康对照者进行了回顾性线索图像生成任务,以检查他们的神经反应。行为学结果显示,社交焦虑组的积极社交场景意象生动性显著低于消极社交场景,而对照组两种情况下的差异不显著。事件相关电位(event - correlation potential, ERP)结果显示,社交焦虑组在中性情境下的N170和LPP波幅显著大于负性情境,而对照组在两种情境间无显著差异。此外,社交焦虑组在积极和中性条件下的LPP振幅均显著高于对照组。这些发现提供了第一个神经生理学证据,表明患有社交焦虑的个体在产生积极和中性社交场景的图像时表现出加工偏差,这表明在这些情况下神经参与程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
期刊最新文献
Obstacle coding in scene-selective cortices α-(Phenylselanyl) acetophenone reverses comorbid depressive-like behavior and mechanical allodynia induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation in mice The pregnant brain: A narrative review of neuroplasticity and adaptation for motherhood Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at different frequencies for post-stroke cognitive impairment: A network meta-analysis Effective connectome-based predictive modeling reveals transdiagnostic heterogeneity of anhedonia from shared hubs to dissociable pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1