{"title":"Expanding contexts of medicalization: The role of policy legacies, race, and class in the prevalence of treatment courts","authors":"Meagan Rainock","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study seeks to examine the association between political and sociodemographic contexts and medicalization by analyzing the prevalence of treatment courts. Using a compiled dataset of 3,132 U.S. counties across all 50 states in 2020, I examine the effect of policy legacies and racial and socioeconomic makeup on the prevalence of treatment courts, which are medicalized alternatives to traditional criminal justice involvement (e.g., incarceration). Regardless of rates of mental distress, substance use, crime rates, population size, and other relevant measures, I find that counties with higher proportions of Black and college educated residents are more likely to have mental health treatment courts. I also find that counties in conservative states and in the South have fewer treatment courts, and that counties with punitive state criminal justice policies (e.g., the death penalty) report fewer treatment courts. I discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the social and political contexts that facilitate medicalization, as well as for the spread of treatment courts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"370 ","pages":"Article 117859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001881","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study seeks to examine the association between political and sociodemographic contexts and medicalization by analyzing the prevalence of treatment courts. Using a compiled dataset of 3,132 U.S. counties across all 50 states in 2020, I examine the effect of policy legacies and racial and socioeconomic makeup on the prevalence of treatment courts, which are medicalized alternatives to traditional criminal justice involvement (e.g., incarceration). Regardless of rates of mental distress, substance use, crime rates, population size, and other relevant measures, I find that counties with higher proportions of Black and college educated residents are more likely to have mental health treatment courts. I also find that counties in conservative states and in the South have fewer treatment courts, and that counties with punitive state criminal justice policies (e.g., the death penalty) report fewer treatment courts. I discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the social and political contexts that facilitate medicalization, as well as for the spread of treatment courts.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.