Expanding contexts of medicalization: The role of policy legacies, race, and class in the prevalence of treatment courts

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117859
Meagan Rainock
{"title":"Expanding contexts of medicalization: The role of policy legacies, race, and class in the prevalence of treatment courts","authors":"Meagan Rainock","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study seeks to examine the association between political and sociodemographic contexts and medicalization by analyzing the prevalence of treatment courts. Using a compiled dataset of 3,132 U.S. counties across all 50 states in 2020, I examine the effect of policy legacies and racial and socioeconomic makeup on the prevalence of treatment courts, which are medicalized alternatives to traditional criminal justice involvement (e.g., incarceration). Regardless of rates of mental distress, substance use, crime rates, population size, and other relevant measures, I find that counties with higher proportions of Black and college educated residents are more likely to have mental health treatment courts. I also find that counties in conservative states and in the South have fewer treatment courts, and that counties with punitive state criminal justice policies (e.g., the death penalty) report fewer treatment courts. I discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the social and political contexts that facilitate medicalization, as well as for the spread of treatment courts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"370 ","pages":"Article 117859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001881","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study seeks to examine the association between political and sociodemographic contexts and medicalization by analyzing the prevalence of treatment courts. Using a compiled dataset of 3,132 U.S. counties across all 50 states in 2020, I examine the effect of policy legacies and racial and socioeconomic makeup on the prevalence of treatment courts, which are medicalized alternatives to traditional criminal justice involvement (e.g., incarceration). Regardless of rates of mental distress, substance use, crime rates, population size, and other relevant measures, I find that counties with higher proportions of Black and college educated residents are more likely to have mental health treatment courts. I also find that counties in conservative states and in the South have fewer treatment courts, and that counties with punitive state criminal justice policies (e.g., the death penalty) report fewer treatment courts. I discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the social and political contexts that facilitate medicalization, as well as for the spread of treatment courts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the experience of employees in assisted living facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative case study Causal mediation of the association between educational attainment and late-life cognitive function by trajectories of social participation Expanding contexts of medicalization: The role of policy legacies, race, and class in the prevalence of treatment courts Exposure to behaviour change techniques and self-management tasks in a nationally-implemented digital intervention for type 2 diabetes self-management: Analysis of usage data Medical uncertainty in the shadow of Dobbs: Treating obstetric complications in a new reproductive frontier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1