Accuracy and consistency of effective atomic number over object size using deep silicon photon-counting detector CT

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104945
Teva N. Shapiro , Aria M. Salyapongse , Meghan G. Lubner , Giuseppe V. Toia , Zhye Yin , Scott Slavic , Timothy P. Szczykutowicz
{"title":"Accuracy and consistency of effective atomic number over object size using deep silicon photon-counting detector CT","authors":"Teva N. Shapiro ,&nbsp;Aria M. Salyapongse ,&nbsp;Meghan G. Lubner ,&nbsp;Giuseppe V. Toia ,&nbsp;Zhye Yin ,&nbsp;Scott Slavic ,&nbsp;Timothy P. Szczykutowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is the newest generation of CT detector technology. It is critical to characterize its performance in measuring important biomarkers used in quantitative CT including effective atomic number (Z<sub>eff</sub>). More accurate Z<sub>eff</sub> measurements could be beneficial in tissue classification and proton therapy tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A phantom of varying water-equivalent diameter (WED) containing clinically relevant inserts was scanned using a prototype deep silicon PCD CT and a dual-energy (DE) energy integrating detector (EID) CT. Z<sub>eff</sub> maps were generated. Measured Z<sub>eff</sub> values were compared across WEDs and to theoretical values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The measured Z<sub>eff</sub> of the polystyrene, solid water, iodine, and bone (50% CaCO3) inserts differed from the theoretical value by a maximum of −14.0%, 4.6%, 8.4% and 13.0% respectively on EID vs 4.5%, 5.2%, 2.3% and 7.2% on PCD. The maximum variation in Z<sub>eff</sub> over the WED range on EID was 0.71, 0.27, 0.66, and 1.22 vs 0.47, 0.64, 0.1 and 0.22 on PCD for polystyrene, solid water, iodine, and bone (50% CaCO3) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first study to evaluate Z<sub>eff</sub> measurements made using a prototype whole body PCD CT system. We found that PCD CT outperformed the EID CT in terms of Z<sub>eff</sub> accuracy and consistency over the WED range on most of the insert materials. Similarly, PCD CT outperformed most previous study’s findings using EID CT. The high consistency and accuracy of measured Z<sub>eff</sub> using deep silicon PCD CT could make quantitative CT increasingly possible over a large range of patient sizes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000559","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is the newest generation of CT detector technology. It is critical to characterize its performance in measuring important biomarkers used in quantitative CT including effective atomic number (Zeff). More accurate Zeff measurements could be beneficial in tissue classification and proton therapy tasks.

Methods

A phantom of varying water-equivalent diameter (WED) containing clinically relevant inserts was scanned using a prototype deep silicon PCD CT and a dual-energy (DE) energy integrating detector (EID) CT. Zeff maps were generated. Measured Zeff values were compared across WEDs and to theoretical values.

Results

The measured Zeff of the polystyrene, solid water, iodine, and bone (50% CaCO3) inserts differed from the theoretical value by a maximum of −14.0%, 4.6%, 8.4% and 13.0% respectively on EID vs 4.5%, 5.2%, 2.3% and 7.2% on PCD. The maximum variation in Zeff over the WED range on EID was 0.71, 0.27, 0.66, and 1.22 vs 0.47, 0.64, 0.1 and 0.22 on PCD for polystyrene, solid water, iodine, and bone (50% CaCO3) respectively.

Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate Zeff measurements made using a prototype whole body PCD CT system. We found that PCD CT outperformed the EID CT in terms of Zeff accuracy and consistency over the WED range on most of the insert materials. Similarly, PCD CT outperformed most previous study’s findings using EID CT. The high consistency and accuracy of measured Zeff using deep silicon PCD CT could make quantitative CT increasingly possible over a large range of patient sizes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for high energy photon and electron fields Exploring biochemical considerations for diffusive alpha radiation therapy (DaRT) models Experience and uncertainty analysis of CT-based adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal treatments All-Ireland evaluation of ultrasound systems for prostate brachytherapy: Application specific quality control protocol and quality assurance phantoms Erratum to "Stability of radiomic features in magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: A multicentre phantom study" [Phys. Medica 130 (2025) 104895].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1