The regulation on the use of supplements for weight control: Case studies from Australia, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom

IF 2.3 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100136
Saiya Whitney Dawson , Dai Quy Le , Eng Joo Tan, Long Khanh-Dao Le
{"title":"The regulation on the use of supplements for weight control: Case studies from Australia, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom","authors":"Saiya Whitney Dawson ,&nbsp;Dai Quy Le ,&nbsp;Eng Joo Tan,&nbsp;Long Khanh-Dao Le","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Overweight and obesity have become more prevalent worldwide which has led to an increase in the demand for non-prescribed weight loss supplements. Given that these products are loosely regulated, they are often misused by adolescents and young adults.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to review regulatory policies for weight loss supplements in Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom to identify areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Peer-reviewed literature was retrieved from EMBASE, OVID, and EBSCOhost databases. Grey literature was identified using Google Advanced Search with 32 targeted keywords and region-specific government domains (.gov.au, .gov, .gov.uk). A narrative synthesis was employed to analyze and compare regulatory policies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 34 articles (7 peer-reviewed and 27 grey literature documents) were included. In Australia, weight loss supplements are classified as low-risk medicines and are not subject to pre-market regulation. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration primarily enforces regulations post-market. In contrast, the United Kingdom has implemented proactive measures through collaborations between government organizations. These include restrictions on the sale and packaging of over-the-counter laxatives and mandatory pharmacist consultations to assess patient needs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight significant regulatory gaps in Australia and the US compared to the UK. Adopting similar policies to those implemented in the UK could help reduce the accessibility of weight loss supplements among at-risk populations like adolescents and young adults. This study also discusses the implications of these findings for developing effective policies and regulations for non-prescribed weight loss supplements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229625000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Overweight and obesity have become more prevalent worldwide which has led to an increase in the demand for non-prescribed weight loss supplements. Given that these products are loosely regulated, they are often misused by adolescents and young adults.

Objective

This study aims to review regulatory policies for weight loss supplements in Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom to identify areas for improvement.

Method

Peer-reviewed literature was retrieved from EMBASE, OVID, and EBSCOhost databases. Grey literature was identified using Google Advanced Search with 32 targeted keywords and region-specific government domains (.gov.au, .gov, .gov.uk). A narrative synthesis was employed to analyze and compare regulatory policies.

Results

A total of 34 articles (7 peer-reviewed and 27 grey literature documents) were included. In Australia, weight loss supplements are classified as low-risk medicines and are not subject to pre-market regulation. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration primarily enforces regulations post-market. In contrast, the United Kingdom has implemented proactive measures through collaborations between government organizations. These include restrictions on the sale and packaging of over-the-counter laxatives and mandatory pharmacist consultations to assess patient needs.

Conclusions

The findings highlight significant regulatory gaps in Australia and the US compared to the UK. Adopting similar policies to those implemented in the UK could help reduce the accessibility of weight loss supplements among at-risk populations like adolescents and young adults. This study also discusses the implications of these findings for developing effective policies and regulations for non-prescribed weight loss supplements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于使用补充剂控制体重的规定:来自澳大利亚、美利坚合众国和联合王国的案例研究
超重和肥胖在世界范围内变得越来越普遍,这导致了对非处方减肥补充剂的需求增加。鉴于这些产品监管松散,它们经常被青少年和年轻人滥用。目的本研究旨在回顾澳大利亚、美国和英国对减肥补充剂的监管政策,以确定需要改进的地方。方法从EMBASE、OVID和EBSCOhost数据库中检索经同行评审的文献。灰色文献使用谷歌高级搜索,包含32个目标关键词和特定地区的政府域名(.gov.au, .gov, .gov.uk)。本文采用叙事综合的方法来分析和比较监管政策。结果共纳入34篇文献,其中同行评议文献7篇,灰色文献27篇。在澳大利亚,减肥补充剂被归类为低风险药物,不受上市前监管。在美国,食品和药物管理局主要执行上市后的法规。相比之下,联合王国通过政府组织之间的合作实施了积极主动的措施。这些措施包括限制非处方泻药的销售和包装,以及强制药剂师咨询以评估患者的需求。与英国相比,研究结果突出了澳大利亚和美国在监管方面的重大差距。采取与英国类似的政策有助于减少青少年和年轻人等高危人群获得减肥补充剂的机会。本研究还讨论了这些发现对制定有效的非处方减肥补充剂政策和法规的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding cost variation in medical and health sciences education: An institutional perspective Spending with purpose: tracking health expenditures in Tajikistan to inform progress toward UHC Exploring changes to financial protection and equity in Lithuania following 2017–2020 policies to improve access to outpatient medicines Variations in Nurse Practitioner full practice authority in the United States: Difference in difference analysis of access and health Performance at a national level Policy barriers to drug repurposing in Europe: different stakeholder perspectives identified during survey-based shortlisting of key challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1