Comparative effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab versus other anti–PD-(L)1 agents in first- and subsequent lines in locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer: Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Lung Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108450
Nicolas Girard , Ji-Youn Han , Ross A. Soo , Kaijun Wang , Wenxi Tang , Georgios F. Nikolaidis , Anastasios Tasoulas , Ifigeneia Barouma , JeanPierre Coaquira Castro , Zheyuan Yang , Tanushree Chaudhary , Lin Zhan
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab versus other anti–PD-(L)1 agents in first- and subsequent lines in locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer: Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Nicolas Girard ,&nbsp;Ji-Youn Han ,&nbsp;Ross A. Soo ,&nbsp;Kaijun Wang ,&nbsp;Wenxi Tang ,&nbsp;Georgios F. Nikolaidis ,&nbsp;Anastasios Tasoulas ,&nbsp;Ifigeneia Barouma ,&nbsp;JeanPierre Coaquira Castro ,&nbsp;Zheyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Tanushree Chaudhary ,&nbsp;Lin Zhan","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To estimate the relative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in first-line (1L) squamous, 1L non-squamous with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50 %, and second- and subsequent lines (2L + ) settings via indirect treatment comparisons, following a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies investigating existing anti–programmed cell death protein-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The SLR was originally conducted in 2022 and updated in 2023. A feasibility assessment (FA) was undertaken to assess the assumptions required for network <em>meta</em>-analysis (NMA) among therapies approved in the UK and European Union aligning with tislelizumab’s license. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Analyses were conducted in the hazard ratio scale for OS and PFS and in the odds ratio scale for TRAEs. Uncertainty was expressed in 95 % credible intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The SLR identified 277 total studies in 1L and 176 in 2L + NSCLC, with 23 and eight carried forward to their respective FAs. After the FA stage, 20 and eight studies qualified for the 1L and 2L + NMAs, respectively. Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was statistically significantly more favorable than most comparator treatments and ranked as best or second-best treatment overall for the following: PFS in 1L squamous NSCLC, OS/PFS in 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and OS/PFS/TRAEs in 2L + NSCLC of any histology. For the remaining analyses (i.e. OS/TRAEs in 1L squamous NSCLC), tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was comparable to other anti–PD-(L)1 therapies and combination therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy appears to be comparable to or more favorable than other regimens of anti–PD-(L)1 therapies or combination therapies in OS/PFS/TRAEs across patients with 1L squamous NSCLC, 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and 2L + NSCLC of any histology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 108450"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500225000716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate the relative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in first-line (1L) squamous, 1L non-squamous with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50 %, and second- and subsequent lines (2L + ) settings via indirect treatment comparisons, following a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies investigating existing anti–programmed cell death protein-(ligand)1 (PD-[L]1) therapies.

Methods

The SLR was originally conducted in 2022 and updated in 2023. A feasibility assessment (FA) was undertaken to assess the assumptions required for network meta-analysis (NMA) among therapies approved in the UK and European Union aligning with tislelizumab’s license. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Analyses were conducted in the hazard ratio scale for OS and PFS and in the odds ratio scale for TRAEs. Uncertainty was expressed in 95 % credible intervals.

Results

The SLR identified 277 total studies in 1L and 176 in 2L + NSCLC, with 23 and eight carried forward to their respective FAs. After the FA stage, 20 and eight studies qualified for the 1L and 2L + NMAs, respectively. Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was statistically significantly more favorable than most comparator treatments and ranked as best or second-best treatment overall for the following: PFS in 1L squamous NSCLC, OS/PFS in 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and OS/PFS/TRAEs in 2L + NSCLC of any histology. For the remaining analyses (i.e. OS/TRAEs in 1L squamous NSCLC), tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy was comparable to other anti–PD-(L)1 therapies and combination therapies.

Conclusions

Tislelizumab with or without chemotherapy appears to be comparable to or more favorable than other regimens of anti–PD-(L)1 therapies or combination therapies in OS/PFS/TRAEs across patients with 1L squamous NSCLC, 1L non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50 %, and 2L + NSCLC of any histology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
tislelizumab 与其他抗 PD-(L)1 药物在局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌一线和后续治疗中的有效性和安全性比较:系统文献综述和网络荟萃分析
目的通过间接治疗比较,评估tislelizumab在一线(1L)鳞状、1L非鳞状伴程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)≥50%、二线及后续线(2L +)的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者伴化疗或不伴化疗的相对疗效和安全性。对现有的抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白(配体)1 (PD-[L]1)疗法进行了系统的文献综述(SLR)。方法单反调查最初于2022年进行,并于2023年更新。进行可行性评估(FA),以评估在英国和欧盟批准的与tislelizumab许可一致的治疗中进行网络荟萃分析(NMA)所需的假设。结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。采用OS和PFS的风险比量表和TRAEs的优势比量表进行分析。不确定度以95%可信区间表示。结果SLR共鉴定了277例1L + NSCLC研究,176例2L + NSCLC研究,其中23例和8例分别进入各自的FAs。FA阶段后,分别有20项和8项研究符合1L和2L + nma标准。Tislelizumab与化疗或不化疗相比,在统计学上显著优于大多数比较药物治疗,并且在以下方面总体上被评为最佳或次佳治疗:1L鳞状NSCLC的PFS, PD-L1≥50%的1L非鳞状NSCLC的OS/PFS,以及任何组织学的2L + NSCLC的OS/PFS/TRAEs。对于其余的分析(即1L鳞状NSCLC的OS/TRAEs), tislelizumab联合或不联合化疗与其他抗pd -(L)1疗法和联合疗法相当。结论:在任何组织学类型的1L鳞状NSCLC、1L非鳞状NSCLC (PD-L1≥50%)和2L + NSCLC的OS/PFS/TRAEs患者中,与其他抗pd -(L)1治疗方案或联合治疗方案相比,司来利单抗与化疗或不化疗似乎相当或更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
407
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Osimertinib after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC: LAURA China cohort 18F-FDG PET/CT and receptor-positive circulating tumor cells-based machine learning model for predicting poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma Hypermethylation of SHOX2 and RASSF1A in intraoperative pleural lavage fluid as a molecular signature of aggressive tumor biology and high histologic grade in stage I lung adenocarcinoma Club cell secretory protein (CCSP) serum concentration is a prognostic factor after surgical resection of localized non-small cell lung cancer in patients in the IFCT-0302 trial SGLT2 inhibitor use reduces progression and surgical intervention of persistent pulmonary nodules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1