Patient counselling on opioids by pharmacy technicians: A mixed-method study to explore facilitators and barriers

Elsemiek A.W. Jansen-Groot Koerkamp , Irem Simsek , Eman Badawy , Mette Heringa , Marcel L. Bouvy
{"title":"Patient counselling on opioids by pharmacy technicians: A mixed-method study to explore facilitators and barriers","authors":"Elsemiek A.W. Jansen-Groot Koerkamp ,&nbsp;Irem Simsek ,&nbsp;Eman Badawy ,&nbsp;Mette Heringa ,&nbsp;Marcel L. Bouvy","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study investigates community pharmacy technicians' (PTs) counselling practices for patients prescribed opioids and identifies facilitators and barriers influencing their counselling behaviour.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sequential exploratory mixed-method study involving interviews and a questionnaire was conducted among PTs, working in Dutch community pharmacies. PTs were recruited via professional networks, panels and social media. Inductive thematic analysis was performed for interviews. Descriptive statistics of questionnaires was performed and associations between behaviour of discussing dependency and background characteristics (1), barriers (2) and beliefs (3) were tested.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen topics emerged from 18 interviews. Out of 252 questionnaire-respondents, most PTs consistently discussed dosage and common side effects during the first opioid dispense. Although 92 % considered discussing opioid dependency important, only 62 % frequently performed it. Barriers included a lack of information about the indication (<em>p</em> = 0.012), lack of work agreements (<em>p</em> = 0.017), time (<em>p</em> = 0.022), feeling insecure (<em>p</em> = 0.041), less work experience (<em>p</em> = 0.025) and the belief that prescribers are responsible for discussing opioid dependency with patients (<em>p</em> = 0.018).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The high importance that PTs place on counselling patients on opioid dependency does not match their behaviour. To close this gap and optimize the role of PTs in promoting safe opioid use, organizational and competency-related barriers must be addressed. This includes clear work protocols, communication training and including the indication on opioid prescriptions.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>This research focuses on an underexplored group involved in patients' opioid management, crucial for designing effective interventions, as PTs frequently have direct patient contact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigates community pharmacy technicians' (PTs) counselling practices for patients prescribed opioids and identifies facilitators and barriers influencing their counselling behaviour.

Methods

A sequential exploratory mixed-method study involving interviews and a questionnaire was conducted among PTs, working in Dutch community pharmacies. PTs were recruited via professional networks, panels and social media. Inductive thematic analysis was performed for interviews. Descriptive statistics of questionnaires was performed and associations between behaviour of discussing dependency and background characteristics (1), barriers (2) and beliefs (3) were tested.

Results

Nineteen topics emerged from 18 interviews. Out of 252 questionnaire-respondents, most PTs consistently discussed dosage and common side effects during the first opioid dispense. Although 92 % considered discussing opioid dependency important, only 62 % frequently performed it. Barriers included a lack of information about the indication (p = 0.012), lack of work agreements (p = 0.017), time (p = 0.022), feeling insecure (p = 0.041), less work experience (p = 0.025) and the belief that prescribers are responsible for discussing opioid dependency with patients (p = 0.018).

Conclusion

The high importance that PTs place on counselling patients on opioid dependency does not match their behaviour. To close this gap and optimize the role of PTs in promoting safe opioid use, organizational and competency-related barriers must be addressed. This includes clear work protocols, communication training and including the indication on opioid prescriptions.

Innovation

This research focuses on an underexplored group involved in patients' opioid management, crucial for designing effective interventions, as PTs frequently have direct patient contact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Patient counselling on opioids by pharmacy technicians: A mixed-method study to explore facilitators and barriers Enhancing perinatal health patient information through ChatGPT – An accuracy study Changes in community pharmacy communication – Towards emotional awareness at the pharmacy counter Corrigendum to “Factors contributing to implementation of a father-friendly neonatal intensive care unit in Denmark” [PEC Innovation 5 (2024) 100353] “It's hard to talk to a computer, I get it”: An exploratory analysis of clinician connection-building communication practices in rural telepalliative care encounters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1