Salt leaching with alternate surface and subsurface drip irrigation enhance cotton yield, water use efficiency, desalination rate, desalination efficiency and economic benefit

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109804
Zijian He, Hongxia Cao, Qingyang Hu, Chen Qi, Zhijun Li
{"title":"Salt leaching with alternate surface and subsurface drip irrigation enhance cotton yield, water use efficiency, desalination rate, desalination efficiency and economic benefit","authors":"Zijian He,&nbsp;Hongxia Cao,&nbsp;Qingyang Hu,&nbsp;Chen Qi,&nbsp;Zhijun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Xinjiang's pivotal cotton industry requires improved irrigation management for sustainable production due to water inefficiency and salt accumulation, while alternate surface and subsurface drip irrigation with mulch (ADI) and salt leaching serve as promising solutions. Objective: Therefore, this study assessed the effects of ADI and salt leaching on soil water, salinity, desalination, cotton yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and economic benefits to identify the optimal strategy. Methods: A field experiment in 2020–2021 used two irrigation methods (ADI; DI: surface drip irrigation with mulch) and four leaching levels (0, 120, 240 and 360 mm). Leaching water was applied in three equal portions during the seedling and budding stages (DI) and flowering stage (subsurface drip irrigation). Results: As leaching levels increased, yield, desalination rate and economic benefits improved, while WUE and desalination efficiency initially increased, then decreased for both irrigation methods. Compared to DI, ADI had worse soil water conditions within the film, but this was mitigated with higher leaching levels. Notably, ADI improved soil salinity conditions, effectively offsetting yield reductions caused by water stress. Compared to DI, ADI boosted cotton yield and WUE by 3.1 %-26.5 %, desalination rate and efficiency by 24.1 %-114.5 %. Despite higher inputs, ADI outperformed DI economically in high salinity soils, with better salt control promoting higher yields. Conclusions: Overall, TOPSIS evaluation showed ADI offered superior benefits over DI. ADI with 252–336 mm leaching water (0.8 g·L⁻¹) was identified as optimal (≥95 % peak performance), balancing desalination, cotton yield, WUE and economic benefits. Significance: This recommendation strongly advocates for the positive impact of ADI in promoting sustainable development in saline agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 109804"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000693","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Xinjiang's pivotal cotton industry requires improved irrigation management for sustainable production due to water inefficiency and salt accumulation, while alternate surface and subsurface drip irrigation with mulch (ADI) and salt leaching serve as promising solutions. Objective: Therefore, this study assessed the effects of ADI and salt leaching on soil water, salinity, desalination, cotton yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and economic benefits to identify the optimal strategy. Methods: A field experiment in 2020–2021 used two irrigation methods (ADI; DI: surface drip irrigation with mulch) and four leaching levels (0, 120, 240 and 360 mm). Leaching water was applied in three equal portions during the seedling and budding stages (DI) and flowering stage (subsurface drip irrigation). Results: As leaching levels increased, yield, desalination rate and economic benefits improved, while WUE and desalination efficiency initially increased, then decreased for both irrigation methods. Compared to DI, ADI had worse soil water conditions within the film, but this was mitigated with higher leaching levels. Notably, ADI improved soil salinity conditions, effectively offsetting yield reductions caused by water stress. Compared to DI, ADI boosted cotton yield and WUE by 3.1 %-26.5 %, desalination rate and efficiency by 24.1 %-114.5 %. Despite higher inputs, ADI outperformed DI economically in high salinity soils, with better salt control promoting higher yields. Conclusions: Overall, TOPSIS evaluation showed ADI offered superior benefits over DI. ADI with 252–336 mm leaching water (0.8 g·L⁻¹) was identified as optimal (≥95 % peak performance), balancing desalination, cotton yield, WUE and economic benefits. Significance: This recommendation strongly advocates for the positive impact of ADI in promoting sustainable development in saline agriculture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
期刊最新文献
Morphogenesis of ratoon crops in response to preharvest nitrogen application in japonica rice Long-term N fertilization increases water use and use-efficiency of winter wheat Salt leaching with alternate surface and subsurface drip irrigation enhance cotton yield, water use efficiency, desalination rate, desalination efficiency and economic benefit Editorial Board Bio-based fertilisers can replace conventional inorganic P fertilisers under European pedoclimatic conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1