Effects of leaf harvesting intensity on fruiting processes in three fodder tree species in the West African Savannah

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122589
Justin Dossou , Towanou Houetchegnon , Christine A.I.N. Ouinsavi , Terence N. Suinyuy
{"title":"Effects of leaf harvesting intensity on fruiting processes in three fodder tree species in the West African Savannah","authors":"Justin Dossou ,&nbsp;Towanou Houetchegnon ,&nbsp;Christine A.I.N. Ouinsavi ,&nbsp;Terence N. Suinyuy","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaf harvesting from fodder trees is one of the major forms of forest disturbance in West Africa, and its frequency is increasing in the wake of climate change. The impacts of leaf harvesting on fruits appearance of <em>Afzelia africana</em> Smith ex Pers., <em>Khaya senegalensis</em> (Desr.) A. Juss., and <em>Pterocarpus erinaceus</em> Poir, particularly in natural savannas, remain largely unexplored. This study explored three fodder species, (i) the minimum fruiting diameter, (ii) the time for the appearance of the first fruits after leaf harvest and (iii) the fruiting diameter most vulnerable to leaf harvest in two ecological zones in Benin. In total, 1040 individuals were examined, including 257 <em>A. africana</em>, 210 <em>K. senegalensis</em>, and 573 <em>P. erinaceus</em> from nine forest reserves in the Sudano-Guinean and Sudanian zones over three years (2021–2023). In the two ecological zones, the average diameters of the fruiting trees were 10 cm for <em>K. senegalensis</em>, 20 cm for <em>P. erinaceus,</em> and 15–20 cm for <em>A. africana</em>. The DBH, harvest intensity, and post-harvest duration were associated significantly with post-harvest fruit appearance. Low and medium leaf harvesting intensities did not prevent fruiting in the three species. Conversely, full leaf harvesting prevented fruiting in <em>A. africana</em> and <em>K. senegalensis</em> for at least two years, unlike in <em>P. erinaceus</em>, which fruited a year later. Stem shoot emergence in large-diameter trees in all three species, which facilitates fruiting, was impaired after leaf harvesting. Considering the results, leaf harvest intensities greater than 75 % should be discouraged to allow the three species to fruit each season to ensure seed availability for natural regeneration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"583 ","pages":"Article 122589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725000970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaf harvesting from fodder trees is one of the major forms of forest disturbance in West Africa, and its frequency is increasing in the wake of climate change. The impacts of leaf harvesting on fruits appearance of Afzelia africana Smith ex Pers., Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) A. Juss., and Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir, particularly in natural savannas, remain largely unexplored. This study explored three fodder species, (i) the minimum fruiting diameter, (ii) the time for the appearance of the first fruits after leaf harvest and (iii) the fruiting diameter most vulnerable to leaf harvest in two ecological zones in Benin. In total, 1040 individuals were examined, including 257 A. africana, 210 K. senegalensis, and 573 P. erinaceus from nine forest reserves in the Sudano-Guinean and Sudanian zones over three years (2021–2023). In the two ecological zones, the average diameters of the fruiting trees were 10 cm for K. senegalensis, 20 cm for P. erinaceus, and 15–20 cm for A. africana. The DBH, harvest intensity, and post-harvest duration were associated significantly with post-harvest fruit appearance. Low and medium leaf harvesting intensities did not prevent fruiting in the three species. Conversely, full leaf harvesting prevented fruiting in A. africana and K. senegalensis for at least two years, unlike in P. erinaceus, which fruited a year later. Stem shoot emergence in large-diameter trees in all three species, which facilitates fruiting, was impaired after leaf harvesting. Considering the results, leaf harvest intensities greater than 75 % should be discouraged to allow the three species to fruit each season to ensure seed availability for natural regeneration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采叶强度对西非大草原3种饲料树种结果过程的影响
采伐饲料树的叶子是西非森林干扰的主要形式之一,随着气候变化,其频率正在增加。采收叶片对非洲榛子果实外观的影响。senegalensis(德文)答:法律原则。和Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir,特别是在天然稀树草原上,大部分仍未被开发。本研究在贝宁的两个生态区探索了三种饲料品种,(i)最小结果直径,(ii)叶片收获后第一次果实出现的时间,(iii)最易受叶片收获影响的结果直径。总共检查了1040人,其中包括257人 A。africana, 210 K。senegalensis和573 P。在三年(2021-2023年)期间,从苏丹-几内亚和苏丹地区的9个森林保护区中获取狐尾猴。在2个生态区,塞内加尔栎平均果树直径为10 cm,羊角栎平均果树直径为20 cm,非洲栎平均果树直径为15 ~ 20 cm。胸径、收获强度和采后持续时间与果实外观显著相关。低、中采叶强度对三种植物的结果均无影响。相反,全叶采伐使非洲古猿和塞内加尔古猿在至少两年的时间里无法结果,而P. erinaceus则在一年之后才结果。三种大直径树种的茎芽出芽在采叶后均受到损害,而茎芽出芽有利于结果。考虑到这些结果,为了保证种子自然再生的有效性,不鼓励超过75% %的叶片收获强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the necessity for an integrated management of the two-spotted oak borer, Agrilus biguttatus, and associated research priorities The phenology of European forests as seen by MODIS Leaf Area Index and GEDI Plant Area Index: Toward an integrated approach Facilitation of underplanted broadleaf trees by pine canopy under Mediterranean conditions depends on thinning intensity and type, not on species drought tolerance Stand density and structural complexity modulate the effects of restorative selective cutting on aboveground carbon stocks Deciphering carbon-water trade-offs between plantations and natural forests in tibet through an ecological spatial network perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1