Self-Liking Group in Networks With Multi-Class Nodes

IF 7.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1109/TNSE.2024.3520967
Fan Wang;Alex Smolyak;Gaogao Dong;Lixin Tian;Shlomo Havlin;Alon Sela
{"title":"Self-Liking Group in Networks With Multi-Class Nodes","authors":"Fan Wang;Alex Smolyak;Gaogao Dong;Lixin Tian;Shlomo Havlin;Alon Sela","doi":"10.1109/TNSE.2024.3520967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nodes in complex networks are generally allocated into groups using community detection methods. These communities are based on the interactions between nodes (links). Conversely, in machine learning, <italic>clustering methods</i> group data points into classes based on their attribute's similarities regardless of their interactions. Although both communities and clustering methods classify data points into groups, they are fundamentally different. Clustering relies on attribute similarity, while communities focus on interaction patterns. The present study bridges these two distinct approaches by introducing a new concept - Self-Liking Groups (SLG). Based on entropy considerations, SLG quantifies the preference of node classes to interact with similar ones based on their communication patterns, thus combining both the community and the clustering methods. We demonstrate SLG in three case studies: (i) A career network of 2.5 million companies, linked by 8 million job switches. Here, SLG reveals the openness of different industrial sectors to workers in other sectors. For example, the Healthcare sector shows the highest SLG, i.e., it is the least open to accepting workers from other sectors, while the Energy sector has a high SLG, but only for educated workers. Also, managers' shift between different sectors is more limited due to higher SLG. (ii) A scientific co-authorship network where SLG measures the openness of collaboration between different countries. China, India and Japan, have stronger SLG and are thus more likely to collaborate with scientists in their own country compared to the USA, Canada, and most EU countries. (iii) In the medical scientific research space, SLG reveals that Japan, a country known for its longevity, is extremely close compared to China or India. We also find that SLG is a stable measure across various community detection methods and initial parameter spaces. This implies that SLG captures a fundamental property of networks with heterogeneous nodes and is useful in analyzing real complex network scenarios.","PeriodicalId":54229,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering","volume":"12 2","pages":"888-899"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10816300/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nodes in complex networks are generally allocated into groups using community detection methods. These communities are based on the interactions between nodes (links). Conversely, in machine learning, clustering methods group data points into classes based on their attribute's similarities regardless of their interactions. Although both communities and clustering methods classify data points into groups, they are fundamentally different. Clustering relies on attribute similarity, while communities focus on interaction patterns. The present study bridges these two distinct approaches by introducing a new concept - Self-Liking Groups (SLG). Based on entropy considerations, SLG quantifies the preference of node classes to interact with similar ones based on their communication patterns, thus combining both the community and the clustering methods. We demonstrate SLG in three case studies: (i) A career network of 2.5 million companies, linked by 8 million job switches. Here, SLG reveals the openness of different industrial sectors to workers in other sectors. For example, the Healthcare sector shows the highest SLG, i.e., it is the least open to accepting workers from other sectors, while the Energy sector has a high SLG, but only for educated workers. Also, managers' shift between different sectors is more limited due to higher SLG. (ii) A scientific co-authorship network where SLG measures the openness of collaboration between different countries. China, India and Japan, have stronger SLG and are thus more likely to collaborate with scientists in their own country compared to the USA, Canada, and most EU countries. (iii) In the medical scientific research space, SLG reveals that Japan, a country known for its longevity, is extremely close compared to China or India. We also find that SLG is a stable measure across various community detection methods and initial parameter spaces. This implies that SLG captures a fundamental property of networks with heterogeneous nodes and is useful in analyzing real complex network scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多类节点网络中的自喜欢群
复杂网络中的节点通常采用社区检测方法进行分组。这些社区基于节点(链接)之间的交互。相反,在机器学习中,聚类方法根据属性的相似性将数据点分组为类,而不管它们之间的相互作用如何。尽管社区和聚类方法都将数据点划分为组,但它们本质上是不同的。聚类依赖于属性相似性,而社区则侧重于交互模式。本研究通过引入一个新概念——自喜欢群体(self - likegroups, SLG),将这两种截然不同的方法连接起来。基于熵的考虑,SLG根据通信模式量化节点类与相似节点类交互的偏好,从而将社区和聚类方法结合起来。我们通过三个案例研究证明了SLG:(i)由250万家公司组成的职业网络,由800万份工作转换联系在一起。这里,SLG揭示了不同产业部门对其他部门工人的开放程度。例如,医疗保健部门显示出最高的SLG,即,它对接受来自其他部门的工人的态度最不开放,而能源部门的SLG很高,但只接受受过教育的工人。此外,由于较高的SLG,管理人员在不同行业之间的转换更加有限。(ii)科学合著网络,其中SLG衡量不同国家之间合作的开放性。与美国、加拿大和大多数欧盟国家相比,中国、印度和日本拥有更强的SLG,因此更有可能与本国科学家合作。㈢在医学科学研究领域,社会福利集团指出,日本是一个以长寿著称的国家,与中国或印度相比,差距非常接近。我们还发现SLG是一个跨越各种社区检测方法和初始参数空间的稳定测度。这意味着SLG捕获了具有异构节点的网络的基本属性,并且在分析真实的复杂网络场景时非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering Engineering-Control and Systems Engineering
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
393
期刊介绍: The proposed journal, called the IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (TNSE), is committed to timely publishing of peer-reviewed technical articles that deal with the theory and applications of network science and the interconnections among the elements in a system that form a network. In particular, the IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering publishes articles on understanding, prediction, and control of structures and behaviors of networks at the fundamental level. The types of networks covered include physical or engineered networks, information networks, biological networks, semantic networks, economic networks, social networks, and ecological networks. Aimed at discovering common principles that govern network structures, network functionalities and behaviors of networks, the journal seeks articles on understanding, prediction, and control of structures and behaviors of networks. Another trans-disciplinary focus of the IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering is the interactions between and co-evolution of different genres of networks.
期刊最新文献
Distance-Aware Hypergraph and Attention Network With Unimodal Assistance for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Enhancing Intrusion Detection via Interpretable Inter-Flow Spatio-Temporal Graphs and Intra-Flow Features FLSC-CI: Federated Learning and Semantic Communication Empowered Multimodal Terminal Collaborative Inferencing Framework for IoT Businesses Underwater Target Tracking Based on Acoustic-Optical Fusion for Multi-AUV Systems A Graph Neural Network-Based Approach for Critical Node Detection in Dynamic Satellite Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1