Advanced Exergy Analysis and Performance Ranking of Components of a Combined Cycle Power Plant

IF 0.9 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Thermal Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1134/S0040601524700642
Uchenna G. Azubuike, Howard O. Njoku, Mkpamdi N. Eke, Onyemaechi V. Ekechukwu
{"title":"Advanced Exergy Analysis and Performance Ranking of Components of a Combined Cycle Power Plant","authors":"Uchenna G. Azubuike,&nbsp;Howard O. Njoku,&nbsp;Mkpamdi N. Eke,&nbsp;Onyemaechi V. Ekechukwu","doi":"10.1134/S0040601524700642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As conventional exergy analyses do not reveal the exergy destruction rates in a thermal system component caused by inefficiencies of interconnected components, actual potentials for improving the component performances cannot be provided by such analyses. This study analyses a combined-cycle gas turbine power plant using advanced exergy analysis methodologies, which address the shortcomings of conventional exergy analysis by evaluating the exergy destruction rates that are endogenous and exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable. Avoidable exergy destruction rates in the entire plant were found to be 31% of the total exergy destruction rates, indicating a significant potential for improving the plant. Exergy destruction rates for most of the plant components were largely endogenous (95.2%), signifying that contributions of cross-component interactions were limited. Avoidable endogenous exergy destruction rates account for 28.4% of the overall exergy destruction rates in the plant, while avoidable exogenous exergy destruction rates account for 2.1%. A component-level ranking of the plant components ranked the pumps in the plant as first for improvement whereas the highest priority was allocated to the combustion chambers (CC) by a plant-level ranking. A parametric study of the influence of CC operating conditions on the plant’s performance showed that CC operating temperatures more significantly affected plant exergy destruction rates than the CC operating pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"72 1","pages":"17 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601524700642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As conventional exergy analyses do not reveal the exergy destruction rates in a thermal system component caused by inefficiencies of interconnected components, actual potentials for improving the component performances cannot be provided by such analyses. This study analyses a combined-cycle gas turbine power plant using advanced exergy analysis methodologies, which address the shortcomings of conventional exergy analysis by evaluating the exergy destruction rates that are endogenous and exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable. Avoidable exergy destruction rates in the entire plant were found to be 31% of the total exergy destruction rates, indicating a significant potential for improving the plant. Exergy destruction rates for most of the plant components were largely endogenous (95.2%), signifying that contributions of cross-component interactions were limited. Avoidable endogenous exergy destruction rates account for 28.4% of the overall exergy destruction rates in the plant, while avoidable exogenous exergy destruction rates account for 2.1%. A component-level ranking of the plant components ranked the pumps in the plant as first for improvement whereas the highest priority was allocated to the combustion chambers (CC) by a plant-level ranking. A parametric study of the influence of CC operating conditions on the plant’s performance showed that CC operating temperatures more significantly affected plant exergy destruction rates than the CC operating pressures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
期刊最新文献
Ammonia as a Fuel for Gas-Turbine Units with Thermochemical Recuperation of Exhaust Gas Heat Development of a Theoretical Model for Predicting Performance of a Gas Ejector in Different Boundary Conditions and Working Fluids Performance Improvement of Power Plant at Aberrant Steam Temperature Condition through E3 Analysis Advanced Exergy Analysis and Performance Ranking of Components of a Combined Cycle Power Plant Assessing the Economic Efficiency of Using Wind Turbines Jointly with Boiler Houses for Heat Supply in Remote and Isolated Regions of the Westernmost Part of Russia’s Arctic Zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1