Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afaf034
Judite Gonçalves, France Weaver
{"title":"Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Judite Gonçalves, France Weaver","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the provision of informal care in major ways. This study documents the prevalences of informal support with (instrumental) activities of daily living (IADL and ADL) before, during and after the pandemic, distinguishing between children, other relatives and friends/neighbours and focusing on individuals 50 years and older across 27 European countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal analysis relies on the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)'s Wave 8 (2019), two Corona surveys (2020 and 2021) and Wave 9 (2022). Linear probability models adjusted for individual fixed effects and time-varying confounders were used to estimate prevalences of informal support over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the pandemic, the prevalences of informal support with both IADL and ADL from all three groups of caregivers increased significantly (P < 0.01), to return to their pre-pandemic levels by 2022. For example, the adjusted likelihood of IADL help from children increased from 18.5% (2019) to 36.6% (2020) and 42.5% (2021), then dropped back to 19.7% in 2022. Friends and neighbours played a critical role, with the adjusted likelihood of IADL help going from 8.8% (2019) to 29.7% (2020), then down to 18% (2021) and 8.9% (2022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future emergency and disaster preparedness plans should contemplate the various sources of informal care, including support measures to non-relative caregivers, as those helpers may be able to rapidly respond to unexpected crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the provision of informal care in major ways. This study documents the prevalences of informal support with (instrumental) activities of daily living (IADL and ADL) before, during and after the pandemic, distinguishing between children, other relatives and friends/neighbours and focusing on individuals 50 years and older across 27 European countries.

Methods: This longitudinal analysis relies on the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)'s Wave 8 (2019), two Corona surveys (2020 and 2021) and Wave 9 (2022). Linear probability models adjusted for individual fixed effects and time-varying confounders were used to estimate prevalences of informal support over time.

Results: During the pandemic, the prevalences of informal support with both IADL and ADL from all three groups of caregivers increased significantly (P < 0.01), to return to their pre-pandemic levels by 2022. For example, the adjusted likelihood of IADL help from children increased from 18.5% (2019) to 36.6% (2020) and 42.5% (2021), then dropped back to 19.7% in 2022. Friends and neighbours played a critical role, with the adjusted likelihood of IADL help going from 8.8% (2019) to 29.7% (2020), then down to 18% (2021) and 8.9% (2022).

Conclusions: Future emergency and disaster preparedness plans should contemplate the various sources of informal care, including support measures to non-relative caregivers, as those helpers may be able to rapidly respond to unexpected crisis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁来救援?在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前、期间和之后,向欧洲老年人提供非正式支持的来源。
背景/目的:2019冠状病毒病大流行在很大程度上扰乱了非正规护理的提供。这项研究记录了在大流行之前、期间和之后日常生活(工具性)活动(IADL和ADL)方面的非正式支持的流行情况,区分了儿童、其他亲戚和朋友/邻居,重点关注27个欧洲国家50岁及以上的个人。方法:该纵向分析依赖于欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的第8波(2019年)、两次Corona调查(2020年和2021年)和第9波(2022年)。对个体固定效应和时变混杂因素进行调整后的线性概率模型用于估计非正式支持随时间的患病率。结果:在大流行期间,所有三组护理人员对IADL和ADL的非正式支持的流行率均显著增加(P结论:未来的应急和备灾计划应考虑各种非正式护理来源,包括对非亲属护理人员的支持措施,因为这些护理人员可能能够迅速应对意外危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Adverse childhood experiences and sarcopenia: a prospective study embedded in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Correction to: Home-based extended rehabilitation for older people with frailty (HERO): a randomised controlled trial. Editor's view-the pathophysiology of delirium. Correction to: The World Health Organization ageism towards older persons scale: preliminary validation of a novel measure of ageist stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination in four different countries. Improving screening in the WHO ICOPE strategy: lessons from risk profiles for major adverse health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1