Switching behavior and changes in smoking behavior by menthol cigarette preference and menthol heated tobacco product use among adults in the United States who smoke cigarettes: an actual use study.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Harm Reduction Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s12954-025-01170-7
Joshua L Karelitz, Yisha He, Elizabeth Becker, Andrea Vansickel
{"title":"Switching behavior and changes in smoking behavior by menthol cigarette preference and menthol heated tobacco product use among adults in the United States who smoke cigarettes: an actual use study.","authors":"Joshua L Karelitz, Yisha He, Elizabeth Becker, Andrea Vansickel","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01170-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heated tobacco products (HTPs) deliver nicotine with significantly lower toxicant exposure relative to combustible cigarettes. HTPs may serve as viable tobacco harm reduction options for adults who smoke but are not able or interested in stopping consuming nicotine-containing products. There is limited information on the degree to which adults in the United States who smoke will switch away from or reduce combusted cigarette consumption when provided with HTPs, and none assessing differences due to menthol cigarette preference or menthol HTP use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a six-week actual use study of an HTP (IQOS®), adults in the United States, ages 21-64 (n = 615), who smoke combustible cigarettes and were not planning to quit were offered free choice of HTPs (one non-menthol and two menthol varieties) to use ad libitum. Preference for smoking menthol or non-menthol cigarettes was assessed upon study entry (374 menthol; 241 non-menthol). The number of HTP sticks and combusted cigarettes consumed were assessed via daily diary administered through smartphone application. Complete switching was defined on a seven-day point prevalence basis-reporting consuming zero combusted cigarettes while continuing to use the HTP research product in Week 6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 247 participants completely switched to HTP, corresponding to 21.1% of all those enrolled at baseline (n = 1173) or 40.2% of those included in primary analyses (n = 615). Among individuals included in primary analyses, we observed greater switching among those who preferred menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes (46.8% vs 29.9%). Probability of switching increased with greater proportional use of menthol versus non-menthol HTPs. Non-menthol cigarette-preferring participants had greater increases in switching when using proportionally more menthol than non-menthol HTPs; switching remained consistently high among menthol-preferring participants. Among participants who did not switch and continued smoking at Week 6, preference for menthol cigarettes and use of proportionally greater menthol versus non-menthol HTPs were each associated with greater reductions in cigarette consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HTP use facilitated switching away from or reducing consumption of combusted cigarettes among adults who smoke, especially when using menthol HTPs. Most participants used menthol HTPs, regardless of their incoming preference for smoking menthol or non-menthol cigarettes. Availability of HTPs in menthol and non-menthol varieties offers an increased tobacco harm reduction opportunity over solely non-menthol by providing adults who smoke with smoke-free alternatives that they find appealing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01170-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heated tobacco products (HTPs) deliver nicotine with significantly lower toxicant exposure relative to combustible cigarettes. HTPs may serve as viable tobacco harm reduction options for adults who smoke but are not able or interested in stopping consuming nicotine-containing products. There is limited information on the degree to which adults in the United States who smoke will switch away from or reduce combusted cigarette consumption when provided with HTPs, and none assessing differences due to menthol cigarette preference or menthol HTP use.

Methods: In a six-week actual use study of an HTP (IQOS®), adults in the United States, ages 21-64 (n = 615), who smoke combustible cigarettes and were not planning to quit were offered free choice of HTPs (one non-menthol and two menthol varieties) to use ad libitum. Preference for smoking menthol or non-menthol cigarettes was assessed upon study entry (374 menthol; 241 non-menthol). The number of HTP sticks and combusted cigarettes consumed were assessed via daily diary administered through smartphone application. Complete switching was defined on a seven-day point prevalence basis-reporting consuming zero combusted cigarettes while continuing to use the HTP research product in Week 6.

Results: Overall, 247 participants completely switched to HTP, corresponding to 21.1% of all those enrolled at baseline (n = 1173) or 40.2% of those included in primary analyses (n = 615). Among individuals included in primary analyses, we observed greater switching among those who preferred menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes (46.8% vs 29.9%). Probability of switching increased with greater proportional use of menthol versus non-menthol HTPs. Non-menthol cigarette-preferring participants had greater increases in switching when using proportionally more menthol than non-menthol HTPs; switching remained consistently high among menthol-preferring participants. Among participants who did not switch and continued smoking at Week 6, preference for menthol cigarettes and use of proportionally greater menthol versus non-menthol HTPs were each associated with greater reductions in cigarette consumption.

Conclusion: HTP use facilitated switching away from or reducing consumption of combusted cigarettes among adults who smoke, especially when using menthol HTPs. Most participants used menthol HTPs, regardless of their incoming preference for smoking menthol or non-menthol cigarettes. Availability of HTPs in menthol and non-menthol varieties offers an increased tobacco harm reduction opportunity over solely non-menthol by providing adults who smoke with smoke-free alternatives that they find appealing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国吸烟的成年人中,薄荷醇香烟偏好和薄荷醇加热烟草产品使用对吸烟行为的转换行为和改变:一项实际使用研究。
背景:与可燃香烟相比,加热烟草制品(HTPs)提供尼古丁的毒性暴露明显较低。对于吸烟但不能或没有兴趣停止消费含尼古丁产品的成年人来说,htp可作为减少烟草危害的可行选择。关于美国成年人在提供高烟碱后会在多大程度上放弃或减少燃烧香烟消费的信息有限,也没有人评估薄荷香烟偏好或薄荷高烟碱使用造成的差异。方法:在一项为期六周的HTP (IQOS®)实际使用研究中,美国21-64岁的成年人(n = 615),吸烟可燃香烟且不打算戒烟,可以自由选择HTP(一种非薄荷醇和两种薄荷醇品种)随意使用。在研究开始时评估人们对薄荷醇和非薄荷醇烟的偏好(374薄荷醇和;241 non-menthol)。通过智能手机应用程序管理的每日日记来评估HTP棒和燃烧香烟的消耗数量。完全转换的定义是在7天的点流行基础上-报告消耗零燃烧卷烟,同时在第6周继续使用HTP研究产品。结果:总体而言,247名参与者完全转换为HTP,对应于基线时所有入组患者的21.1% (n = 1173)或主要分析纳入患者的40.2% (n = 615)。在纳入初级分析的个体中,我们观察到更喜欢薄荷香烟的人与不喜欢薄荷香烟的人之间的转换更大(46.8%对29.9%)。与非薄荷脑HTPs相比,使用薄荷脑的比例越大,切换的可能性越大。与非薄荷香烟相比,非薄荷香烟偏好者在使用比例更多的薄荷香烟时,转换香烟的几率更大;在喜欢薄荷醇的参与者中,转换率一直很高。在第6周没有转换并继续吸烟的参与者中,对薄荷香烟的偏好以及与非薄荷香烟相比,使用比例更高的薄荷香烟与香烟消费量的更大减少有关。结论:HTP的使用有助于成年人戒烟或减少燃烧香烟的消费,尤其是在使用薄荷HTP时。大多数参与者使用薄荷醇香烟,不管他们是否喜欢吸薄荷醇香烟。薄荷醇和非薄荷醇品种的HTPs通过向吸烟的成年人提供他们认为有吸引力的无烟替代品,提供了比纯非薄荷醇更大的减少烟草危害的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
期刊最新文献
Spike on a bike: mobile harm reduction in action. Sexual violence at Australian universities: intersectionality in policy and practice. "No judgment, no preaching": approaches to harm reduction service provision for people who use drugs in North Carolina. Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and preferences for service delivery among people who inject drugs accessing a syringe service program. Fentanyl use among people who inject drugs in two large Pacific Northwest metropolitan areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1