Susnata Salony, Josselin Clo, Filip Kolář, Clément Lafon Placette
{"title":"A survey of triploid block inconsistency: potential mechanisms and evolutionary implications on polyploid speciation.","authors":"Susnata Salony, Josselin Clo, Filip Kolář, Clément Lafon Placette","doi":"10.1093/jxb/eraf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The triploid block, primarily caused by endosperm developmental issues, is known as a significant barrier to interploidy hybridization among flowering plants and thereby, polyploid speciation. However, its strength varies across taxa, with some instances of leakiness, questioning its universal role as a barrier. We conducted a literature survey to explore the causes of the variation in the strength of triploid block across 11 angiosperm families. We particularly assessed the impact of interploidy cross direction, types of endosperm development, endosperm persistence at seed maturity, and divergence between cytotypes using a Bayesian meta-analysis. We found a significant influence of the type of endosperm in shaping variation in triploid block strength. Other factors tested had no impact on triploid seed viability, likely due to limited data and inconsistencies in estimation methods across the literature. In addition, triploid seed viability in experimental crosses was sometimes correlated to the occurrence of triploid hybrids in nature, sometimes not, suggesting a mixed role of the triploid block in shaping interspecies gene flow. Altogether, our study highlights the need for unified approaches in future studies on the triploid block to advance our understanding of its variation and evolutionary implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The triploid block, primarily caused by endosperm developmental issues, is known as a significant barrier to interploidy hybridization among flowering plants and thereby, polyploid speciation. However, its strength varies across taxa, with some instances of leakiness, questioning its universal role as a barrier. We conducted a literature survey to explore the causes of the variation in the strength of triploid block across 11 angiosperm families. We particularly assessed the impact of interploidy cross direction, types of endosperm development, endosperm persistence at seed maturity, and divergence between cytotypes using a Bayesian meta-analysis. We found a significant influence of the type of endosperm in shaping variation in triploid block strength. Other factors tested had no impact on triploid seed viability, likely due to limited data and inconsistencies in estimation methods across the literature. In addition, triploid seed viability in experimental crosses was sometimes correlated to the occurrence of triploid hybrids in nature, sometimes not, suggesting a mixed role of the triploid block in shaping interspecies gene flow. Altogether, our study highlights the need for unified approaches in future studies on the triploid block to advance our understanding of its variation and evolutionary implications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Botany publishes high-quality primary research and review papers in the plant sciences. These papers cover a range of disciplines from molecular and cellular physiology and biochemistry through whole plant physiology to community physiology.
Full-length primary papers should contribute to our understanding of how plants develop and function, and should provide new insights into biological processes. The journal will not publish purely descriptive papers or papers that report a well-known process in a species in which the process has not been identified previously. Articles should be concise and generally limited to 10 printed pages.