Associations Between Epistemic Trust and the Severity of Personality Disorder: Results From a Study Comparing Patients With Personality Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Controls.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000001825
Saskia Knapen, Wendy Mensink, Wilma E Swildens, Adriaan W Hoogendoorn, Puck Duits, Joost Hutsebaut, Aartjan T F Beekman
{"title":"Associations Between Epistemic Trust and the Severity of Personality Disorder: Results From a Study Comparing Patients With Personality Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Controls.","authors":"Saskia Knapen, Wendy Mensink, Wilma E Swildens, Adriaan W Hoogendoorn, Puck Duits, Joost Hutsebaut, Aartjan T F Beekman","doi":"10.1097/NMD.0000000000001825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Early childhood adversity may dispose an individual to adopt a rigid and pervasive hypervigilant position toward information coming from others, resulting in high levels of epistemic mistrust (EM), which is supposed to increase the risk of developing psychopathology. A more intrinsic relationship between EM and the development of personality disorders (PDs) is assumed. Although the theory of epistemic trust (ET) is rather novel, it has quickly become widely accepted in the field, despite much empirical evidence. This is the first study investigating the level of ET and associations between ET and PDs among patients with PD, anxiety disorders, and a community sample. Our results demonstrated more severe impairments in ET in patients, and associations found between ET and the severity and types of PDs corroborate the theoretically assumed model. Future research with larger samples and prospective designs is needed to explore further and substantiate the theoretical assumptions about ET.</p>","PeriodicalId":16480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","volume":" ","pages":"65-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Early childhood adversity may dispose an individual to adopt a rigid and pervasive hypervigilant position toward information coming from others, resulting in high levels of epistemic mistrust (EM), which is supposed to increase the risk of developing psychopathology. A more intrinsic relationship between EM and the development of personality disorders (PDs) is assumed. Although the theory of epistemic trust (ET) is rather novel, it has quickly become widely accepted in the field, despite much empirical evidence. This is the first study investigating the level of ET and associations between ET and PDs among patients with PD, anxiety disorders, and a community sample. Our results demonstrated more severe impairments in ET in patients, and associations found between ET and the severity and types of PDs corroborate the theoretically assumed model. Future research with larger samples and prospective designs is needed to explore further and substantiate the theoretical assumptions about ET.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知信任与人格障碍严重程度之间的关系:一项比较人格障碍、焦虑障碍和对照组患者的研究结果
摘要:儿童早期逆境可能使个体对来自他人的信息采取一种僵化的、普遍的高度警惕的姿态,从而产生高度的认知不信任(epistemic不信任,EM),从而增加发生精神病理的风险。EM与人格障碍(pd)的发展之间存在更内在的关系。虽然认知信任理论是一个比较新颖的理论,但尽管有很多经验证据,它已经迅速被广泛接受。这是第一个在PD患者、焦虑症患者和社区样本中调查ET水平以及ET与PD之间关系的研究。我们的研究结果表明,患者的ET损伤更严重,ET与pd的严重程度和类型之间的关联证实了理论上假设的模型。未来的研究需要更大的样本和前瞻性的设计来进一步探索和证实关于ET的理论假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease publishes peer-reviewed articles containing new data or ways of reorganizing established knowledge relevant to understanding and modifying human behavior, especially that defined as impaired or diseased, and the context, applications and effects of that knowledge. Our policy is summarized by the slogan, "Behavioral science for clinical practice." We consider articles that include at least one behavioral variable, clear definition of study populations, and replicable research designs. Authors should use the active voice and first person whenever possible.
期刊最新文献
Predicting Social Motivation and Interactions in Schizophrenia: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. Trends of Mental Illnesses Across Developing Countries in Africa and Asia: A Comparative Analysis. Mental Illness Attributions and Their Association With Psychotherapy Change Process Expectations. Use of EQUATOR Network Templates in JNMD: The STROBE Guideline for Observational Studies. A Cross-Sectional Study of Social Exclusion in Schizophrenia: Emotional Blunting and Autonomic Arousal in Response to Cyberball.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1