Clinical outcomes after stenting treatment in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and intrinsic versus extrinsic venous sinus stenosis.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022760
Xu Tong, Zhongao Guan, Xiaoqing Li, Shuran Wang, Shuang Song, Yawen Gan, Fangguang Chen, Jie He, Ketao Tu, Zhenfei Yu, Dapeng Mo
{"title":"Clinical outcomes after stenting treatment in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and intrinsic versus extrinsic venous sinus stenosis.","authors":"Xu Tong, Zhongao Guan, Xiaoqing Li, Shuran Wang, Shuang Song, Yawen Gan, Fangguang Chen, Jie He, Ketao Tu, Zhenfei Yu, Dapeng Mo","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular stenting is a promising treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and venous sinus stenosis (VSS). However, data on the impact of stenosis type on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing stenting treatment remain limited. This prospective cohort study aimed to compare post-stenting outcomes in patients with IIH and intrinsic versus extrinsic VSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with IIH and VSS undergoing stenting at a tertiary hospital in China were enrolled consecutively from 2017 to 2023. Based on digital subtraction angiography, high-resolution MRI, and intravascular ultrasound findings, patients were categorized into two groups: intrinsic or extrinsic stenosis. At 6 months post-stenting, clinical outcomes including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, headache, visual impairment, and papilledema were recorded. Multivariable regression models were used to explore the relationship between stenosis type and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 92 patients were included, 60 with intrinsic stenosis and 32 with extrinsic stenosis. At 6 months, the intrinsic group had lower CSF pressure (median 180 vs 210 mmH<sub>2</sub>O, β coefficient -31.8, 95% CI -54.0 to -9.6) and a higher rate of complete symptom resolution (81.7% vs 40.6%, OR 8.88, 95% CI 2.60 to 30.30) than the extrinsic group. Additionally, 36.8% (95% CI 10.5% to 77.2%) of the effect of stenosis type on complete symptom resolution at 6 months was mediated through reduction in CSF pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This single-center study suggested that patients with IIH and intrinsic VSS had lower CSF pressure and better symptom recovery compared with those with extrinsic VSS at 6 months post-stenting. Further validation in other centers and populations is needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR-ONN-17010421.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"460-467"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022760","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endovascular stenting is a promising treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and venous sinus stenosis (VSS). However, data on the impact of stenosis type on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing stenting treatment remain limited. This prospective cohort study aimed to compare post-stenting outcomes in patients with IIH and intrinsic versus extrinsic VSS.

Methods: Patients with IIH and VSS undergoing stenting at a tertiary hospital in China were enrolled consecutively from 2017 to 2023. Based on digital subtraction angiography, high-resolution MRI, and intravascular ultrasound findings, patients were categorized into two groups: intrinsic or extrinsic stenosis. At 6 months post-stenting, clinical outcomes including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, headache, visual impairment, and papilledema were recorded. Multivariable regression models were used to explore the relationship between stenosis type and clinical outcomes.

Results: In total, 92 patients were included, 60 with intrinsic stenosis and 32 with extrinsic stenosis. At 6 months, the intrinsic group had lower CSF pressure (median 180 vs 210 mmH2O, β coefficient -31.8, 95% CI -54.0 to -9.6) and a higher rate of complete symptom resolution (81.7% vs 40.6%, OR 8.88, 95% CI 2.60 to 30.30) than the extrinsic group. Additionally, 36.8% (95% CI 10.5% to 77.2%) of the effect of stenosis type on complete symptom resolution at 6 months was mediated through reduction in CSF pressure.

Conclusion: This single-center study suggested that patients with IIH and intrinsic VSS had lower CSF pressure and better symptom recovery compared with those with extrinsic VSS at 6 months post-stenting. Further validation in other centers and populations is needed.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR-ONN-17010421.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特发性颅内高压伴内源性静脉窦狭窄与外源性静脉窦狭窄患者支架治疗后的临床疗效。
背景:血管内支架植入术是治疗特发性颅内高压(IIH)和静脉窦狭窄(VSS)的一种很有前景的治疗方法。然而,关于狭窄类型对接受支架治疗的患者临床结果的影响的数据仍然有限。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在比较IIH和内源性与外源性VSS患者支架置入后的结果。方法:选取2017 - 2023年在国内某三级医院行支架术的IIH和VSS患者为研究对象。根据数字减影血管造影、高分辨率MRI和血管内超声检查结果,将患者分为两组:内源性或外源性狭窄。在支架植入后6个月,记录临床结果,包括脑脊液(CSF)压力、头痛、视力损害和乳头水肿。采用多变量回归模型探讨狭窄类型与临床预后的关系。结果:共纳入92例患者,其中内生性狭窄60例,外源性狭窄32例。6个月时,内源性组脑脊液压力较低(中位数180 vs 210 mmH2O, β系数-31.8,95% CI -54.0至-9.6),症状完全消退率较高(81.7% vs 40.6%, OR 8.88, 95% CI 2.60至30.30)。此外,36.8% (95% CI 10.5% ~ 77.2%)的狭窄类型对6个月症状完全缓解的影响是通过脑脊液压力降低介导的。结论:该单中心研究表明,与外源性VSS患者相比,IIH和内源性VSS患者在支架植入术后6个月脑脊液压力更低,症状恢复更好。需要在其他中心和人群中进一步验证。试验注册号:ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR-ONN-17010421。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
期刊最新文献
Final results of the Ruptured Aneurysms treated with HydroGEl Coils (RAGE) study: a multicenter study of 771 patients. Leptomeningeal collateral status and thrombectomy outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Super large bore catheters in the treatment of stroke: systematic review. Regional brain atrophy, white matter lesions, and functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Predictors of enucleation after intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1