Ablative margin assessment for recurrence prediction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving radiofrequency ablation.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2025.02.023
Geeng-Jia Hu, Quan-Yin Zheng, Feng-Guang Tsai, Chiueng-Fang Wu, Yi-Cheng Hsiao, Chih-Kai Chang, Po-Chin Liang, Chih-Horng Wu
{"title":"Ablative margin assessment for recurrence prediction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving radiofrequency ablation.","authors":"Geeng-Jia Hu, Quan-Yin Zheng, Feng-Guang Tsai, Chiueng-Fang Wu, Yi-Cheng Hsiao, Chih-Kai Chang, Po-Chin Liang, Chih-Horng Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.02.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>To predict outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) by assessing the ablative margin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 163 HCC patients with complete RFA treatment at National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) from 2015 to 2020. Local tumor progression (LTP) is defined as the reappearance of HCC around the ablative zone. Various ablative margins (AM) are measured on post-RFA computed tomography (CT), including the minimal and maximal AM covering or not covering the liver surfaces (AMCLSmin, AMCLSmax, AMULSmin, AMULSmax). Average ablative margins (AMCLSavg, AMULSavg) are calculated from the minimal and maximal AM. Tumors at high-risk locations, including subdiaphragmatic, subcapsular, and perivascular regions, were further analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to analyze the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of different groups of patients. Patients were grouped by their ablative margin width with a cutting-off value of 3 mm or 5 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 163 HCC patients enrolled, 29 had LTP within two years, and 20 had LTP after two years. AMULSmin and AMULSavg were shown to be significant factors contributing to local tumor recurrences. Patients with AMULSmin≧3 mm had significantly better RFS than those with AMULSmin<3 mm (p = 0.0236). In high-risk locations, AMULSavg ≧5 mm had better RFS in subdiaphragmatic and subcapsular regions, and AMULSavg ≧3 mm had better RFS in perivascular region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring the ablative margin without covering the liver surface (especially AMULSmin, AMULSavg) in the post-RFA CT may be helpful prognosis indicators of LTP and RFS in HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.02.023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/purpose: To predict outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) by assessing the ablative margin.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 163 HCC patients with complete RFA treatment at National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) from 2015 to 2020. Local tumor progression (LTP) is defined as the reappearance of HCC around the ablative zone. Various ablative margins (AM) are measured on post-RFA computed tomography (CT), including the minimal and maximal AM covering or not covering the liver surfaces (AMCLSmin, AMCLSmax, AMULSmin, AMULSmax). Average ablative margins (AMCLSavg, AMULSavg) are calculated from the minimal and maximal AM. Tumors at high-risk locations, including subdiaphragmatic, subcapsular, and perivascular regions, were further analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to analyze the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of different groups of patients. Patients were grouped by their ablative margin width with a cutting-off value of 3 mm or 5 mm.

Results: Of the 163 HCC patients enrolled, 29 had LTP within two years, and 20 had LTP after two years. AMULSmin and AMULSavg were shown to be significant factors contributing to local tumor recurrences. Patients with AMULSmin≧3 mm had significantly better RFS than those with AMULSmin<3 mm (p = 0.0236). In high-risk locations, AMULSavg ≧5 mm had better RFS in subdiaphragmatic and subcapsular regions, and AMULSavg ≧3 mm had better RFS in perivascular region.

Conclusion: Measuring the ablative margin without covering the liver surface (especially AMULSmin, AMULSavg) in the post-RFA CT may be helpful prognosis indicators of LTP and RFS in HCC patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射频消融术对肝癌复发预测的消融切缘评估。
背景/目的:通过评估消融范围来预测肝细胞癌(HCC)射频消融(RFA)后的预后。方法:回顾性分析2015年至2020年在国立台湾大学医院(NTUH)接受完全RFA治疗的163例HCC患者。局部肿瘤进展(LTP)定义为消融区周围HCC的重新出现。在rfa后计算机断层扫描(CT)上测量各种消融边缘(AM),包括最小和最大的AM覆盖或不覆盖肝脏表面(AMCLSmin, AMCLSmax, AMULSmin, AMULSmax)。平均烧蚀余量(AMCLSavg, AMULSavg)由最小和最大AM计算。高危部位的肿瘤,包括膈下、包膜下和血管周围区域,进一步分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析不同组患者的无复发生存率(RFS)。结果:163例HCC患者中,29例在2年内发生LTP, 20例在2年后发生LTP。AMULSmin和AMULSavg是促进局部肿瘤复发的重要因素。结论:rfa后CT测量不覆盖肝表面的消融边缘(尤其是AMULSmin、AMULSavg)可能是HCC患者LTP和RFS的有价值的预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Deep brain stimulation and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in Parkinsonism and related disorders: State-of-the-art and future prospects". Comment on "Long-term surgical outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for patients with femoral neck fracture with metal versus ceramic head in Taiwan". Beyond the consultation room: traditional Chinese medicine and employment status in chronic cough burden estimation. Comment on "Predictive machine learning algorithms for depression and anxiety disorders in six cancer types: A comprehensive multi-center population-based study". Reply to the letter on "metabolic and liver stiffness measures for hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification after viral eradication in chronic hepatitis C".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1