{"title":"Lasers for treatment of androgenetic alopecia: an in-depth analysis.","authors":"Aditya K Gupta, Daniel Taylor, Keyvan Nouri","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04365-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With recent developments in laser technologies and growing demand for alternative treatments, laser therapy has been increasingly studied as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and fractional laser therapies have been marketed as safe and effective options for treating AGA in comparison with traditional drug therapies, which are associated with unwanted side effects. We discuss the history of development and implementation of laser devices for treatment of hair loss and outline the proposed mechanism of action for LLLT and fractional lasers. Additionally, we summarize the evidence of efficacy for LLLT and fractional laser monotherapies in the treatment of AGA and assess potential risk of bias in available clinical studies. While evidence is still mounting, there exists some congruency in proposed mechanisms for the stimulation of hair follicles by laser therapy. Laser light is believed to foster a supportive microenvironment for the hair follicle, through improved vascularization and modulation of inflammation, and directly stimulate growth signaling in the follicle. As for evidence of clinical efficacy, studies of LLLT and fractional laser monotherapies have reported improvement in AGA markers from baseline values. However, these studies have a relatively small sample size and our risk of bias assessment suggests some concerns in procedural design. Although laser therapy represents a safe alternative treatment option for AGA, its evidence of efficacy is hindered by a lack of large-scale, high-quality clinical trials, susceptibility to bias, and a wide range of devices, treatment protocols and parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04365-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With recent developments in laser technologies and growing demand for alternative treatments, laser therapy has been increasingly studied as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and fractional laser therapies have been marketed as safe and effective options for treating AGA in comparison with traditional drug therapies, which are associated with unwanted side effects. We discuss the history of development and implementation of laser devices for treatment of hair loss and outline the proposed mechanism of action for LLLT and fractional lasers. Additionally, we summarize the evidence of efficacy for LLLT and fractional laser monotherapies in the treatment of AGA and assess potential risk of bias in available clinical studies. While evidence is still mounting, there exists some congruency in proposed mechanisms for the stimulation of hair follicles by laser therapy. Laser light is believed to foster a supportive microenvironment for the hair follicle, through improved vascularization and modulation of inflammation, and directly stimulate growth signaling in the follicle. As for evidence of clinical efficacy, studies of LLLT and fractional laser monotherapies have reported improvement in AGA markers from baseline values. However, these studies have a relatively small sample size and our risk of bias assessment suggests some concerns in procedural design. Although laser therapy represents a safe alternative treatment option for AGA, its evidence of efficacy is hindered by a lack of large-scale, high-quality clinical trials, susceptibility to bias, and a wide range of devices, treatment protocols and parameters.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.