Child somatic growth and neurodevelopment: effects of pregnancy lifestyle intervention

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Research Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1038/s41390-025-03936-y
Kristina Geyer, Roxana Raab, Monika Spies, Johanna Knoke, Dorothy Meyer, Stephanie Brandt-Heunemann, Hans Hauner
{"title":"Child somatic growth and neurodevelopment: effects of pregnancy lifestyle intervention","authors":"Kristina Geyer, Roxana Raab, Monika Spies, Johanna Knoke, Dorothy Meyer, Stephanie Brandt-Heunemann, Hans Hauner","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-03936-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maternal health behavior influences offspring health and obesity risk. This study examined the long-term effects of an antenatal lifestyle intervention on somatic growth and neurodevelopment of preschool-aged children. We followed children born to women in the cluster-randomized GeliS trial who received usual care (CG) or lifestyle counseling (IG). Anthropometrics and neurodevelopment data for children aged 4 and 5 were collected from routine health examinations and the Ages-and-Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). Of 2 286 women initially enrolled, 1 403 reported on their child’s development. The intervention had no effect on weight, height, head circumference, BMI, or percentiles and z-scores at ages 4 and 5. In IG compared to CG, the proportion of children with underweight was lower (4 years: 7.8% vs. 10.9%; 5 years: 8.1% vs. 8.9%), while overweight (4 years: 6.5% vs. 4.2%; 5 years: 5.1% vs. 3.4%) and obesity proportions (4 years: 1.0% vs. 1.1%; 5 years: 2.7% vs. 1.6%) were higher. IG children were more likely to fall into a higher weight category at 4 (p = 0.017) and 5 years (p = 0.075). ASQ scores were similar across both groups. Despite slight weight differences, the pregnancy lifestyle intervention had no meaningful impact on child somatic growth or neurodevelopment up to age 5.","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":"98 2","pages":"585-592"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-025-03936-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-025-03936-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maternal health behavior influences offspring health and obesity risk. This study examined the long-term effects of an antenatal lifestyle intervention on somatic growth and neurodevelopment of preschool-aged children. We followed children born to women in the cluster-randomized GeliS trial who received usual care (CG) or lifestyle counseling (IG). Anthropometrics and neurodevelopment data for children aged 4 and 5 were collected from routine health examinations and the Ages-and-Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). Of 2 286 women initially enrolled, 1 403 reported on their child’s development. The intervention had no effect on weight, height, head circumference, BMI, or percentiles and z-scores at ages 4 and 5. In IG compared to CG, the proportion of children with underweight was lower (4 years: 7.8% vs. 10.9%; 5 years: 8.1% vs. 8.9%), while overweight (4 years: 6.5% vs. 4.2%; 5 years: 5.1% vs. 3.4%) and obesity proportions (4 years: 1.0% vs. 1.1%; 5 years: 2.7% vs. 1.6%) were higher. IG children were more likely to fall into a higher weight category at 4 (p = 0.017) and 5 years (p = 0.075). ASQ scores were similar across both groups. Despite slight weight differences, the pregnancy lifestyle intervention had no meaningful impact on child somatic growth or neurodevelopment up to age 5.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童躯体生长和神经发育:妊娠生活方式干预的影响。
目的:探讨孕产妇健康行为对子代健康和肥胖风险的影响。本研究探讨了产前生活方式干预对学龄前儿童躯体生长和神经发育的长期影响。方法:我们跟踪了群随机GeliS试验中接受常规护理(CG)或生活方式咨询(IG)的妇女所生的孩子。通过常规健康检查和年龄阶段问卷(ASQ)收集4岁和5岁儿童的人体测量学和神经发育数据。结果:在最初纳入的2286名妇女中,1403名报告了她们孩子的发育情况。干预对4岁和5岁时的体重、身高、头围、BMI或百分位数和z分数没有影响。IG组与CG组相比,体重不足儿童的比例更低(4岁:7.8% vs. 10.9%;5岁:8.1%对8.9%),而超重(4岁:6.5%对4.2%;5岁:5.1%对3.4%)和肥胖比例(4岁:1.0%对1.1%;5年:2.7%比1.6%)更高。IG儿童更有可能在4岁(p = 0.017)和5岁(p = 0.075)时落入体重较高的类别。两组的ASQ得分相似。结论:妊娠生活方式干预对5岁前儿童的躯体生长和神经发育无显著影响,但体重有轻微差异。影响:这项全面的产前生活方式干预,作为一项大规模的真实世界有效性试验,没有证明对儿童的人体测量或5岁前超重或肥胖的风险有任何长期影响。在儿童神经发育结果方面没有观察到明显的干预效果。可能需要针对孕妇个体风险概况的个性化产前干预措施,以大幅改变生活方式行为,并对儿童发育和肥胖风险产生可持续影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
期刊最新文献
Editor’s Focus Beyond the scale: bioelectrical impedance for neonatal growth. Caroline Kelsey: ECI Biocommentary. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. First, do no trend: aligning parenteral lipid therapy with physiology and evidence in neonates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1