Child somatic growth and neurodevelopment: effects of pregnancy lifestyle intervention.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Research Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1038/s41390-025-03936-y
Kristina Geyer, Roxana Raab, Monika Spies, Johanna Knoke, Dorothy Meyer, Stephanie Brandt-Heunemann, Hans Hauner
{"title":"Child somatic growth and neurodevelopment: effects of pregnancy lifestyle intervention.","authors":"Kristina Geyer, Roxana Raab, Monika Spies, Johanna Knoke, Dorothy Meyer, Stephanie Brandt-Heunemann, Hans Hauner","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-03936-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Maternal health behavior influences offspring health and obesity risk. This study examined the long-term effects of an antenatal lifestyle intervention on somatic growth and neurodevelopment of preschool-aged children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed children born to women in the cluster-randomized GeliS trial who received usual care (CG) or lifestyle counseling (IG). Anthropometrics and neurodevelopment data for children aged 4 and 5 were collected from routine health examinations and the Ages-and-Stages Questionnaire (ASQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2 286 women initially enrolled, 1 403 reported on their child's development. The intervention had no effect on weight, height, head circumference, BMI, or percentiles and z-scores at ages 4 and 5. In IG compared to CG, the proportion of children with underweight was lower (4 years: 7.8% vs. 10.9%; 5 years: 8.1% vs. 8.9%), while overweight (4 years: 6.5% vs. 4.2%; 5 years: 5.1% vs. 3.4%) and obesity proportions (4 years: 1.0% vs. 1.1%; 5 years: 2.7% vs. 1.6%) were higher. IG children were more likely to fall into a higher weight category at 4 (p = 0.017) and 5 years (p = 0.075). ASQ scores were similar across both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite slight weight differences, the pregnancy lifestyle intervention had no meaningful impact on child somatic growth or neurodevelopment up to age 5.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This comprehensive antenatal lifestyle intervention, executed as a large-scale real-world effectiveness trial, did not demonstrate any long-term effect on children's anthropometry or their risk of overweight or obesity up to 5 years of age. No discernible intervention effects were observed concerning children's neurodevelopment outcomes. Personalized antenatal interventions targeting the individual risk profiles of pregnant women may be needed to substantially modify lifestyle behaviors and achieve sustainable impacts on child development and obesity risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-03936-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Maternal health behavior influences offspring health and obesity risk. This study examined the long-term effects of an antenatal lifestyle intervention on somatic growth and neurodevelopment of preschool-aged children.

Methods: We followed children born to women in the cluster-randomized GeliS trial who received usual care (CG) or lifestyle counseling (IG). Anthropometrics and neurodevelopment data for children aged 4 and 5 were collected from routine health examinations and the Ages-and-Stages Questionnaire (ASQ).

Results: Of 2 286 women initially enrolled, 1 403 reported on their child's development. The intervention had no effect on weight, height, head circumference, BMI, or percentiles and z-scores at ages 4 and 5. In IG compared to CG, the proportion of children with underweight was lower (4 years: 7.8% vs. 10.9%; 5 years: 8.1% vs. 8.9%), while overweight (4 years: 6.5% vs. 4.2%; 5 years: 5.1% vs. 3.4%) and obesity proportions (4 years: 1.0% vs. 1.1%; 5 years: 2.7% vs. 1.6%) were higher. IG children were more likely to fall into a higher weight category at 4 (p = 0.017) and 5 years (p = 0.075). ASQ scores were similar across both groups.

Conclusion: Despite slight weight differences, the pregnancy lifestyle intervention had no meaningful impact on child somatic growth or neurodevelopment up to age 5.

Impact: This comprehensive antenatal lifestyle intervention, executed as a large-scale real-world effectiveness trial, did not demonstrate any long-term effect on children's anthropometry or their risk of overweight or obesity up to 5 years of age. No discernible intervention effects were observed concerning children's neurodevelopment outcomes. Personalized antenatal interventions targeting the individual risk profiles of pregnant women may be needed to substantially modify lifestyle behaviors and achieve sustainable impacts on child development and obesity risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
期刊最新文献
Neuropathiazol induces neuronal-like differentiation in neuroblastoma cells via upregulation of PEG5. Child somatic growth and neurodevelopment: effects of pregnancy lifestyle intervention. Infant sleep EEG features at 4 months as biomarkers of neurodevelopment at 18 months. Scientific evolution from the definition of Hirschsprung disease to the present: a bibliometric analysis (1980-2023). Isabel Torres Cuevas: ECI biocommentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1