Are there rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular disease hospitalization and other outcomes in people with gout? A nationwide U.S. study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keaf112
Jasvinder A Singh, Sumanth R Chandrupatla
{"title":"Are there rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular disease hospitalization and other outcomes in people with gout? A nationwide U.S. study.","authors":"Jasvinder A Singh, Sumanth R Chandrupatla","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess whether rural vs urban patient residence is associated with the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) hospitalization and other outcomes in people with gout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the 2016-2019 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to assess whether rural patient residence is associated with a higher risk of MI hospitalizations in gout, while adjusting for demographics (age, sex, race), comorbidity, median household income, insurance payer, and hospital characteristics (location and teaching status, bed size, hospital control, and hospital region). We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that, compared with urban residents, people living in the rural areas had higher crude rates of MI, 2640 vs 3145 per 100 000 area-specific gout hospitalizations. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, compared with urban residents with gout, the rural area residents with gout were significantly more likely to have a MI hospitalization, with an odds ratio of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.61-1.79; P < 0.001). The association was confirmed in multiple sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated significant rural-urban disparities in the risk of MI hospitalization in people with gout. Policymakers and hospital systems need to design and implement interventions to reduce these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"4744-4749"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess whether rural vs urban patient residence is associated with the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) hospitalization and other outcomes in people with gout.

Methods: We used the 2016-2019 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to assess whether rural patient residence is associated with a higher risk of MI hospitalizations in gout, while adjusting for demographics (age, sex, race), comorbidity, median household income, insurance payer, and hospital characteristics (location and teaching status, bed size, hospital control, and hospital region). We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs (CIs).

Results: We found that, compared with urban residents, people living in the rural areas had higher crude rates of MI, 2640 vs 3145 per 100 000 area-specific gout hospitalizations. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, compared with urban residents with gout, the rural area residents with gout were significantly more likely to have a MI hospitalization, with an odds ratio of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.61-1.79; P < 0.001). The association was confirmed in multiple sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: We demonstrated significant rural-urban disparities in the risk of MI hospitalization in people with gout. Policymakers and hospital systems need to design and implement interventions to reduce these disparities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痛风患者心血管疾病住院治疗的城乡差异及其结果:一项美国全国性研究。
目的:评估患者居住是否与痛风患者心肌梗死(MI)住院风险相关。方法:我们使用了2016-2019年美国国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库,评估农村患者居住是否与痛风患者MI住院的较高风险相关,同时调整人口统计学(年龄、性别、种族)、合并症、家庭收入中位数、保险付款人和医院特征(地点和教学状况、床位大小、医院控制和医院区域)。我们计算了调整后的优势比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:我们发现,与城市居民相比,生活在农村地区的人有更高的心肌梗死粗率,每10万地区特定痛风住院患者为2640人,而每10万地区特定痛风住院患者为3145人。在多变量调整分析中,与患有痛风的城市居民相比,农村地区患有痛风的居民更有可能发生心肌梗死,比值比为1.70 (95% CI, 1.61-1.79;p < 0.001)。多重敏感性分析证实了这种关联。结论:我们证明了痛风患者心肌梗死住院风险的显著城乡差异。决策者和医院系统需要设计和实施干预措施,以减少这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
期刊最新文献
Vaping and vascular health-emerging risks for Raynaud's, chilblains & Buerger's disease. Revisiting lupus low disease activity: validation matters, but vindication is imperative. Transcriptomic profiling of secukinumab-treated psoriatic arthritis reveals potential novel response-associated pathways. Lung transplant outcomes in myositis, systemic sclerosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter retrospective analysis Development of structural damage in the spine in patients with psoriatic arthritis: findings from a longitudinal cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1