Non-invasive prenatal testing for dominant single-gene disorders using targeted next-generation sequencing.

IF 6.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL QJM: An International Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcaf017
Hongyun Zhang, Jun He, Yanling Teng, Qingxin Shi, Fang Liu, Can Peng, Siyuan Linpeng, Yingdi Liu, Huimin Zhu, Juan Wen, Desheng Liang, Zhuo Li, Lingqian Wu
{"title":"Non-invasive prenatal testing for dominant single-gene disorders using targeted next-generation sequencing.","authors":"Hongyun Zhang, Jun He, Yanling Teng, Qingxin Shi, Fang Liu, Can Peng, Siyuan Linpeng, Yingdi Liu, Huimin Zhu, Juan Wen, Desheng Liang, Zhuo Li, Lingqian Wu","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) mainly targets the detection of chromosome aberrations but not dominant single-gene disorders (dSGDs).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This prospective pilot study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of a plasma cfDNA and targeted next-generation sequencing-based NIPT approach for dSGDs (NIPT-dSGD), with a particular focus on neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective pilot study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NIPT-dSGD method targeted 34 genes, including 25 correlated to NDDs and nine correlated to Noonan spectrum, skeletal, craniosynostosis and other syndromic disorders. Retrospective samples first validated NIPT-dSGD and then performed for a prospective cohort of 567 pregnant women seeking NIPT-dSGD. The testing results were compared to invasive prenatal or postnatal genetic diagnosis by whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 535 samples with qualified NIPT-dSGD analysis, 11 (2.1%) had one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in one of the 34 genes. Three of the 11 variants were paternally inherited, and eight were de novo. Five positive cases had normal ultrasound parameters and three of them had disease-causing variants in NDD genes. Particularly, one family had two pregnancies with de novo variants of two different genes (GRIN2B: c.1606G>A and ARID1B: c.6100A>G). NIPT-dSGD did not generate any false-positive or negative results, achieving 100% of sensitivity (95% CI, 71.7-100%) and 100% of specificity (95% CI, 99.0-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NIPT-dSGD provides accurate genetic testing for de novo and paternally inherited variants of dominant genes, including those that do not cause any ultrasound abnormalities, which could assist clinicians and families in better pregnancy management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"344-353"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) mainly targets the detection of chromosome aberrations but not dominant single-gene disorders (dSGDs).

Aim: This prospective pilot study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of a plasma cfDNA and targeted next-generation sequencing-based NIPT approach for dSGDs (NIPT-dSGD), with a particular focus on neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).

Design: Prospective pilot study.

Methods: The NIPT-dSGD method targeted 34 genes, including 25 correlated to NDDs and nine correlated to Noonan spectrum, skeletal, craniosynostosis and other syndromic disorders. Retrospective samples first validated NIPT-dSGD and then performed for a prospective cohort of 567 pregnant women seeking NIPT-dSGD. The testing results were compared to invasive prenatal or postnatal genetic diagnosis by whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing.

Results: Of the 535 samples with qualified NIPT-dSGD analysis, 11 (2.1%) had one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in one of the 34 genes. Three of the 11 variants were paternally inherited, and eight were de novo. Five positive cases had normal ultrasound parameters and three of them had disease-causing variants in NDD genes. Particularly, one family had two pregnancies with de novo variants of two different genes (GRIN2B: c.1606G>A and ARID1B: c.6100A>G). NIPT-dSGD did not generate any false-positive or negative results, achieving 100% of sensitivity (95% CI, 71.7-100%) and 100% of specificity (95% CI, 99.0-100%).

Conclusion: NIPT-dSGD provides accurate genetic testing for de novo and paternally inherited variants of dominant genes, including those that do not cause any ultrasound abnormalities, which could assist clinicians and families in better pregnancy management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非侵入性产前检测优势单基因疾病使用靶向下一代测序。
背景:目前基于无细胞DNA (cfDNA)的无创产前检测(NIPT)主要针对染色体畸变而非显性单基因疾病(dSGDs)的检测。目的:本前瞻性先导研究旨在评估血浆cfDNA和靶向下一代基于测序的NIPT方法对dsgd (npt - dsgd)的临床应用,特别关注神经发育障碍(ndd)。方法:npt - dsgd方法针对34个基因,其中25个与ndd相关,9个与Noonan谱、骨骼、颅缝紧闭和其他综合征相关。回顾性样本首先验证了NIPT-dSGD,然后对567名寻求NIPT-dSGD的孕妇进行了前瞻性队列研究。将检测结果与全外显子组测序和Sanger测序的有创产前或产后遗传诊断进行比较。结果:在535份合格的npt - dsgd分析样本中,11份(2.1%)在34个基因中的一个中有一个致病或可能致病的变异。11个变异中有3个是父系遗传的,8个是新生的。5例阳性病例超声参数正常,其中3例NDD基因有致病变异。特别是,一个家庭有两次怀孕,两种不同基因(GRIN2B: c.1606G>A和ARID1B: c.6100A>G)的新生变异。npt - dsgd未产生任何假阳性或阴性结果,达到100%的敏感性(95% CI, 71.7%-100%)和100%的特异性(95% CI, 99.0%-100%)。结论:npt - dsgd为新生儿和显性基因的父系遗传变异提供了准确的基因检测,包括那些不引起任何超声异常的基因,可以帮助临床医生和家庭更好地进行妊娠管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
263
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles. Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence. In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.
期刊最新文献
Reply to letter to the editor Reassessing Ménétrier's disease: diagnostic variability, molecular subtypes, and implications for precision therapy. Dyskeratosis Congenita Due to a de novo TINF2 Mutation. A Tiger in Sheep's Clothing: When the Tiger-Man Sign is Not Sarcoidosis. Lifestyles, leisure activities, subjective well-being, and long-term survival after age 80 in China: a population-based cohort study. ChatGPT Health-your 'doctor' in your pocket, or is it?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1