The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04045
Ling Liu, Jia Peng, Sumit Kane, Chenkai Wu, Yumei Liu, Jiayan Huang
{"title":"The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index.","authors":"Ling Liu, Jia Peng, Sumit Kane, Chenkai Wu, Yumei Liu, Jiayan Huang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, most primary health care institutes (PHCIs) support ground-level medical services which are essential to residents' health levels. The Chinese government implemented a health reform in 2009 to strengthen PHCIs through increased fiscal inputs. However, how efficiently these inputs were converted into PHCIs' services remains unclear. We aimed to examine the efficiency of PHCIs' medical services and investigate if any changes occurred following the implementation of the health reform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aggregated data from PHCIs from Hainan's 18 districts (2011-21), treating those from the same district as one decision-making unit (DMU). We used three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiencies of these PHCIs, adjusting the approach for environmental factors, managerial ineffectiveness, and statistical errors potentially arising from the background variability of measured data that deviates from the input and output values, allowing all DMUs to be compared in a homogeneous environment. We used the adjusted efficiency scores to evaluate the efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan each year and the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to explore the productivity change of PHCIs over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for environmental factors between 2011-21, technical efficiency (TE) decreased from 0.825 to 0.745, pure technical efficiency (PTE) increased from 0.936 to 0.954, and scale efficiency (SE) decreased from 0.883 to 0.783. Seven districts had full PTE (1.0) and two districts had full TE (1.0) after adjustment. The mean MPI from 2011 to 2021 was 0.9430, indicating a 5.7% decrease in PHCIs' efficiency. After excluding the low productivity index possibly influenced by COVID-19 (2019 to 2021), PHCIs' efficiency decreased by 0.49%, with a mean MPI of 0.9951.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan has declined slightly since the health reform. Low level of scale efficiency posed a significant impact on the overall efficiency of the medical services in PHCIs. Among potential inefficient technological performances, future policy formulation might focus more on the imbalanced allocation of resources in less-developed regions and PHCIs' lack of attractiveness to local patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04045"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In China, most primary health care institutes (PHCIs) support ground-level medical services which are essential to residents' health levels. The Chinese government implemented a health reform in 2009 to strengthen PHCIs through increased fiscal inputs. However, how efficiently these inputs were converted into PHCIs' services remains unclear. We aimed to examine the efficiency of PHCIs' medical services and investigate if any changes occurred following the implementation of the health reform.

Methods: We aggregated data from PHCIs from Hainan's 18 districts (2011-21), treating those from the same district as one decision-making unit (DMU). We used three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiencies of these PHCIs, adjusting the approach for environmental factors, managerial ineffectiveness, and statistical errors potentially arising from the background variability of measured data that deviates from the input and output values, allowing all DMUs to be compared in a homogeneous environment. We used the adjusted efficiency scores to evaluate the efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan each year and the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to explore the productivity change of PHCIs over time.

Results: After adjusting for environmental factors between 2011-21, technical efficiency (TE) decreased from 0.825 to 0.745, pure technical efficiency (PTE) increased from 0.936 to 0.954, and scale efficiency (SE) decreased from 0.883 to 0.783. Seven districts had full PTE (1.0) and two districts had full TE (1.0) after adjustment. The mean MPI from 2011 to 2021 was 0.9430, indicating a 5.7% decrease in PHCIs' efficiency. After excluding the low productivity index possibly influenced by COVID-19 (2019 to 2021), PHCIs' efficiency decreased by 0.49%, with a mean MPI of 0.9951.

Conclusions: The efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan has declined slightly since the health reform. Low level of scale efficiency posed a significant impact on the overall efficiency of the medical services in PHCIs. Among potential inefficient technological performances, future policy formulation might focus more on the imbalanced allocation of resources in less-developed regions and PHCIs' lack of attractiveness to local patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于三阶段DEA和Malmquist生产率指数的2009年医疗改革以来中国初级医疗卫生机构效率和生产率变化趋势
背景:在中国,大多数初级卫生保健机构(phci)支持基层医疗服务,这对居民的健康水平至关重要。中国政府于2009年实施了医疗改革,通过增加财政投入来加强初级卫生保健。然而,这些投入如何有效地转化为初级保健机构的服务仍不清楚。我们的目的是检查初级保健机构的医疗服务效率,并调查实施卫生改革后是否发生了任何变化。方法:汇总海南省18个区县(2011-21年)基层医疗卫生机构的数据,将同一区县的基层医疗卫生机构作为一个决策单位(DMU)。我们使用三阶段数据包络分析(DEA)来评估这些phci的效率,根据环境因素、管理效率低下以及测量数据偏离输入和输出值的背景可变性可能引起的统计误差调整方法,允许在同质环境中对所有dmu进行比较。我们利用调整后的效率得分对海南省医疗卫生基础设施的年度效率进行评价,并利用Malmquist生产率指数(MPI)探讨医疗卫生基础设施的生产率随时间的变化。结果:2011-21年,经环境因素调整后,技术效率(TE)由0.825下降至0.745,纯技术效率(PTE)由0.936上升至0.954,规模效率(SE)由0.883下降至0.783。经调整后,7个区县PTE为满值(1.0),2个区县为满值(1.0)。2011 - 2021年的平均MPI为0.9430,表明phci的效率下降了5.7%。在排除2019 - 2021年可能受新冠肺炎影响的低生产率指数后,初级医疗卫生机构的效率下降了0.49%,平均MPI为0.9951。结论:自医改以来,海南省初级医疗保健机构的效率略有下降。规模效率低对初级保健国家医疗服务的整体效率造成了重大影响。在潜在的低效率技术绩效中,未来的政策制定可能会更多地关注欠发达地区资源配置的不平衡以及初级保健医院对当地患者缺乏吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of postnatal outcomes from a group antenatal care intervention in Nigeria: a quasi-experimental study. Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990-2021: a Global Burden of Disease study. Fertility intention and its determinants of childbearing-age population in China after the three-child policy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension-diabetes comorbidity in tropical Chinese adults. Maternal air pollution exposure and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1