From defensive reasoning to innovation: how digital tools foster positive emotions in organizations.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02486-6
Guyang Tian, Yang Yang, Xue Zhang, Manlu Zhao, Yezhuang Tian
{"title":"From defensive reasoning to innovation: how digital tools foster positive emotions in organizations.","authors":"Guyang Tian, Yang Yang, Xue Zhang, Manlu Zhao, Yezhuang Tian","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02486-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers of organizational learning and innovation have frequently claimed that defensive reasoning is an inducer of negative emotions present in most organizations, inhibiting continuing innovation and development and individuals' effective learning. Although a significant amount of research has been conducted on the factors that reduce defensive reasoning in an organization, the breakthrough process and its outcomes have not yet been studied. This study uses narrative network analysis on longitudinal data from a Chinese tourist resort to explore how organizational factors-such as institutional environments, social media platforms, and virtual-reality role transformations-help employees overcome defensive reasoning and foster innovation. It demonstrates how digital management tools and corporate social platforms transform negative emotions into positive, creativity-enhancing actions. By analyzing individual defenses from both general and job position perspectives, the study introduces a comprehensive theoretical framework that highlights the role of emotional guidance and digital tools in reducing defensiveness, promoting collaboration, and improving organizational effectiveness and innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02486-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers of organizational learning and innovation have frequently claimed that defensive reasoning is an inducer of negative emotions present in most organizations, inhibiting continuing innovation and development and individuals' effective learning. Although a significant amount of research has been conducted on the factors that reduce defensive reasoning in an organization, the breakthrough process and its outcomes have not yet been studied. This study uses narrative network analysis on longitudinal data from a Chinese tourist resort to explore how organizational factors-such as institutional environments, social media platforms, and virtual-reality role transformations-help employees overcome defensive reasoning and foster innovation. It demonstrates how digital management tools and corporate social platforms transform negative emotions into positive, creativity-enhancing actions. By analyzing individual defenses from both general and job position perspectives, the study introduces a comprehensive theoretical framework that highlights the role of emotional guidance and digital tools in reducing defensiveness, promoting collaboration, and improving organizational effectiveness and innovation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从防御性推理到创新:数字工具如何在组织中培养积极情绪。
研究组织学习和创新的学者经常声称,防御性推理是大多数组织中存在的负面情绪的诱因,抑制了持续的创新和发展以及个人的有效学习。尽管已经对减少组织中防御推理的因素进行了大量的研究,但尚未对突破过程及其结果进行研究。本研究采用叙事网络分析方法对中国某旅游度假区的纵向数据进行分析,探讨组织因素(如制度环境、社交媒体平台和虚拟现实角色转换)如何帮助员工克服防御性推理和促进创新。它展示了数字管理工具和企业社交平台如何将负面情绪转化为积极的、增强创造力的行动。通过从总体和岗位两个角度分析个体防御,本研究引入了一个全面的理论框架,强调了情感引导和数字工具在减少防御、促进协作、提高组织效率和创新方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Self-compassion as a well-being strategy against burnout among dentists: a controlled intervention study. A disaster in the disaster: a study on post-traumatic stress symptoms among flood relief workers in Pakistan. Sleepy aggression: examining the interrelationships and mechanisms between sleep quality and aggressive behavior. Compassion fatigue and satisfaction in post-earthquake psychosocial support providers: the roles of self-compassion, resilience, and mindfulness. Investigating the relationship between clan culture and teachers' work engagement using the PLS-SEM approach: a moderated mediation model of job autonomy and humble leadership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1