Expert consensus on vitamin D in osteoporosis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Annals of Joint Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aoj-24-48
Sha Lei, Xiaoya Zhang, Lige Song, Jinhui Wen, Zheng Zhang, Jianqing Tian, Rui Yang, Shuhang Xu, Shanhu Qiu, Richard J MacIsaac, Jasna Aleksova, Fabrice Mac-Way, Marie-Ève Dupuis, David Benaiges, Didac Mauricio, Andrei P Sommer, Joshua I Barzilay, John C Gallagher, Lingling Pan, Linlin Ji, Ping Fang, Ying Li, Qi Liu, Jiasheng Zhao, Ying Xue, Yuqin Shen, Lemin Wang, Junfeng Han, Guanghui Liu
{"title":"Expert consensus on vitamin D in osteoporosis.","authors":"Sha Lei, Xiaoya Zhang, Lige Song, Jinhui Wen, Zheng Zhang, Jianqing Tian, Rui Yang, Shuhang Xu, Shanhu Qiu, Richard J MacIsaac, Jasna Aleksova, Fabrice Mac-Way, Marie-Ève Dupuis, David Benaiges, Didac Mauricio, Andrei P Sommer, Joshua I Barzilay, John C Gallagher, Lingling Pan, Linlin Ji, Ping Fang, Ying Li, Qi Liu, Jiasheng Zhao, Ying Xue, Yuqin Shen, Lemin Wang, Junfeng Han, Guanghui Liu","doi":"10.21037/aoj-24-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate vitamin D is essential for maintaining optimal bone health, preventing and treating of osteoporosis. However, in recent years, large clinical trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures in populations at different risks have been equivocal. The optimal level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) remains controversial. Recommendations vary between societies. The lack of standardized assays also poses a challenge in interpreting available research data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for articles in MEDLINE database through PubMed, which included meta-analysis, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed measurement, diagnosis and treatment about vitamin D deficiency. The experts evaluated the available literature, graded references according to the type of study and described the strength recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This expert consensus is based on the review of relevant clinical evidence and provides nine key recommendations on vitamin D deficiency in populations at different risks, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Supporting information is provided in the subsequent appendix box.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This expert consensus is a practical tool for endocrinologists, general physicians for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of populations at different risks of vitamin D deficiency, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Clinicians should be aware of the evidence but make individualized decisions based on specific patients or situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":"10 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-24-48","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate vitamin D is essential for maintaining optimal bone health, preventing and treating of osteoporosis. However, in recent years, large clinical trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures in populations at different risks have been equivocal. The optimal level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) remains controversial. Recommendations vary between societies. The lack of standardized assays also poses a challenge in interpreting available research data.

Methods: We systematically searched for articles in MEDLINE database through PubMed, which included meta-analysis, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed measurement, diagnosis and treatment about vitamin D deficiency. The experts evaluated the available literature, graded references according to the type of study and described the strength recommendations.

Results: This expert consensus is based on the review of relevant clinical evidence and provides nine key recommendations on vitamin D deficiency in populations at different risks, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Supporting information is provided in the subsequent appendix box.

Conclusions: This expert consensus is a practical tool for endocrinologists, general physicians for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of populations at different risks of vitamin D deficiency, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Clinicians should be aware of the evidence but make individualized decisions based on specific patients or situation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家对骨质疏松症中维生素D的共识。
背景:充足的维生素D对于维持最佳的骨骼健康,预防和治疗骨质疏松症至关重要。然而,近年来,关于补充维生素D预防不同风险人群骨折疗效的大型临床试验和荟萃分析一直模棱两可。25-羟基维生素D (25[OH]D)的最佳水平仍然存在争议。不同社会的建议各不相同。标准化分析方法的缺乏也对解释现有研究数据提出了挑战。方法:我们通过PubMed系统检索MEDLINE数据库中的文章,包括meta分析、随机对照试验(rct)的系统综述和评估维生素D缺乏症的测量、诊断和治疗的观察性研究。专家们评估了现有的文献,根据研究类型对参考文献进行了评分,并描述了强度建议。结果:这一专家共识是基于对相关临床证据的回顾,并就不同风险人群,特别是骨质疏松症患者的维生素D缺乏症提供了九项关键建议。在后面的附录框中提供了支持信息。结论:这一专家共识是内分泌学家、普通医生诊断、评估和治疗不同维生素D缺乏风险人群的实用工具,尤其是骨质疏松症患者。临床医生应该了解证据,但根据具体的患者或情况做出个性化的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Current standards for the objective assessment and management of posterior cruciate ligament tears: a narrative review. Commentary is not a substitute for evidence generation. Technical considerations and early results of magnetic compressive intramedullary nailing for tibial and femoral shaft non-unions: a case series. The impact of blood flow restriction therapy on orthopaedic conditions of the upper extremity: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Academic, leadership, and demographic characteristics of orthopaedic arthroplasty leadership: a 2022 cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1