Adaptive transition decisions and identity exploration among transgender and nonbinary persons exposed to gender identity conversion efforts.

IF 10.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL International Journal of Transgender Health Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26895269.2024.2415681
Tural Mammadli, Jarrod Call, Brendon T Holloway, Darren L Whitfield, N Eugene Walls
{"title":"Adaptive transition decisions and identity exploration among transgender and nonbinary persons exposed to gender identity conversion efforts.","authors":"Tural Mammadli, Jarrod Call, Brendon T Holloway, Darren L Whitfield, N Eugene Walls","doi":"10.1080/26895269.2024.2415681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) persons' healthcare experiences and related transition decisions have received increasing attention in recent years. Growing literature indicates gender non-affirming practices, such as gender identity conversion efforts (GICE), are harmful for the wellbeing of TNB persons. Yet, how exposure to GICE is linked to transition related decisions among TNB persons remains unexplored. This study examines links between GICE and TNB persons' transition decisions and identity exploration, using a conceptual framework that distinguishes adaptive transition decisions (e.g. transition interruptions due to interpersonal coercion) from identity-related transition decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a secondary data analysis of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (<i>N</i> = 27,630). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to examine the relationship between GICE and transition decisions among TNB persons while controlling for demographic covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 13.5% of TNB participants experienced GICE. Participants interrupted their transition due to interpersonal coercion (4.9%), structural factors (2.0%), and identity-related factors (0.4%). Participants with GICE exposure were more likely to report interrupting their transition due to interpersonal coercion than not interrupting their transition. However, GICE-exposed participants did not have a higher chance of identity-related transition interruptions than no interruptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings point to a potentially harmful role GICE may play in the transition decisions of TNB persons. Our analysis adds to evidence indicating the need for banning GICE and calls for a more nuanced understanding, recognition, and respect for TNB persons' non-linear transitioning trajectories. Otherwise, we risk vilifying gender-affirming practices and pathologizing adaptive transitioning decisions of TNB persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":48480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgender Health","volume":"26 1","pages":"198-214"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2024.2415681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) persons' healthcare experiences and related transition decisions have received increasing attention in recent years. Growing literature indicates gender non-affirming practices, such as gender identity conversion efforts (GICE), are harmful for the wellbeing of TNB persons. Yet, how exposure to GICE is linked to transition related decisions among TNB persons remains unexplored. This study examines links between GICE and TNB persons' transition decisions and identity exploration, using a conceptual framework that distinguishes adaptive transition decisions (e.g. transition interruptions due to interpersonal coercion) from identity-related transition decisions.

Methods: This study is a secondary data analysis of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (N = 27,630). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to examine the relationship between GICE and transition decisions among TNB persons while controlling for demographic covariates.

Results: Overall, 13.5% of TNB participants experienced GICE. Participants interrupted their transition due to interpersonal coercion (4.9%), structural factors (2.0%), and identity-related factors (0.4%). Participants with GICE exposure were more likely to report interrupting their transition due to interpersonal coercion than not interrupting their transition. However, GICE-exposed participants did not have a higher chance of identity-related transition interruptions than no interruptions.

Conclusions: These findings point to a potentially harmful role GICE may play in the transition decisions of TNB persons. Our analysis adds to evidence indicating the need for banning GICE and calls for a more nuanced understanding, recognition, and respect for TNB persons' non-linear transitioning trajectories. Otherwise, we risk vilifying gender-affirming practices and pathologizing adaptive transitioning decisions of TNB persons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Gatekeeping gender-affirming care is detrimental to detrans people. Lived experiences: Exploring detransition narratives. Decentering cisnormativity and transnormativity in transition interruption and detransitioning research. Correction. Grappling with the complexities of gender transition interruptions: Toward conceptual clarity on "detransitioning" experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1