Conversations about cigarette health warning labels and smoking cessation attempts in Mexico.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Salud Publica De Mexico Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.21149/16044
Edna Judith Arillo-Santillán, Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Eric Monterrubio-Flores, Dèsirée Vidaña-Pérez, James F Thrasher
{"title":"Conversations about cigarette health warning labels and smoking cessation attempts in Mexico.","authors":"Edna Judith Arillo-Santillán, Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Eric Monterrubio-Flores, Dèsirée Vidaña-Pérez, James F Thrasher","doi":"10.21149/16044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate how conversations about health warning labels (HWLs) influence attempts to quit smoking (QAs) and sustained attempts to quit (SQAs) among in Mexican adult who smoke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from a cohort of 2 164 participants surveyed every four months between November 2018 and March 2021. Multinomial models regressed the frequency of talking about HWLs on sociodemographics and smoking-related variables. Generalized Estimating Equations assessed whether the effect of HWL talking frequency on QAs and, separately, SQAs at follow-up was mediated by the topic of conversation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority reported having talked about HWLs (63.7%), regarding the harms of tobacco (73.3%), cessation benefits (58.5%), and lack of credibility/utility of HWLs (9.8%). At follow-up, 42.0% reported an QAs and 20.7% an SQAs. Conversations about HWLs were more frequent among younger participants, those with a university education, those who had recently attempted to quit smoking, and those intending to quit. Talking about HWLs was associated with a higher frequency of QAs and SQAs, mediated equally by discussions about cessation benefits and tobacco harms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conversation topics around HWL are mesassociated with more smoking cessation attempts. Mexican HWLs focus primarily on harms, more research is needed to evaluate the optimal mix of content.</p>","PeriodicalId":47913,"journal":{"name":"Salud Publica De Mexico","volume":"67 1 (ene-feb)","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Publica De Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21149/16044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate how conversations about health warning labels (HWLs) influence attempts to quit smoking (QAs) and sustained attempts to quit (SQAs) among in Mexican adult who smoke.

Materials and methods: Data were analyzed from a cohort of 2 164 participants surveyed every four months between November 2018 and March 2021. Multinomial models regressed the frequency of talking about HWLs on sociodemographics and smoking-related variables. Generalized Estimating Equations assessed whether the effect of HWL talking frequency on QAs and, separately, SQAs at follow-up was mediated by the topic of conversation.

Results: The majority reported having talked about HWLs (63.7%), regarding the harms of tobacco (73.3%), cessation benefits (58.5%), and lack of credibility/utility of HWLs (9.8%). At follow-up, 42.0% reported an QAs and 20.7% an SQAs. Conversations about HWLs were more frequent among younger participants, those with a university education, those who had recently attempted to quit smoking, and those intending to quit. Talking about HWLs was associated with a higher frequency of QAs and SQAs, mediated equally by discussions about cessation benefits and tobacco harms.

Conclusion: Conversation topics around HWL are mesassociated with more smoking cessation attempts. Mexican HWLs focus primarily on harms, more research is needed to evaluate the optimal mix of content.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥关于香烟健康警告标签和戒烟尝试的对话。
目的:评估健康警告标签(HWLs)对话对墨西哥成年吸烟者戒烟尝试(QAs)和持续戒烟尝试(SQAs)的影响。材料和方法:对2018年11月至2021年3月期间每四个月接受一次调查的2164名参与者的数据进行分析。多项模型回归了社会人口统计学和吸烟相关变量上谈论长寿的频率。广义估计方程评估了HWL谈话频率对问答的影响,以及随访时问答的影响是否由谈话话题介导。结果:大多数人报告说他们谈论过HWLs(63.7%),烟草的危害(73.3%),戒烟的好处(58.5%),以及HWLs缺乏可信度/实用性(9.8%)。随访时,42.0%的患者报告有质量保证,20.7%的患者报告有质量保证。年轻人、受过大学教育的人、最近尝试戒烟的人和打算戒烟的人更频繁地谈论高强度戒烟。谈论hwl与高频率的QAs和SQAs相关,讨论戒烟益处和烟草危害同样起到中介作用。结论:围绕HWL的谈话话题与更多的戒烟尝试有关。墨西哥HWLs主要关注危害,需要更多的研究来评估内容的最佳组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Publica De Mexico
Salud Publica De Mexico PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
21.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Salud Pública de México se crea en 1959 y comienza a publicarse bimestralmente a partir de 1961; en 1988 inicia una nueva época en la que se refuerza su carácter de publicación científica con evaluación por pares. Es una revista publicada por el Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), organismo descentralizado de la Secretaría de Salud de México, dedicado a la investigación, docencia y difusión del conocimiento en salud pública. El INSP, de acuerdo con la normatividad internacional, otorga a la revista independencia editorial.
期刊最新文献
Bolsas de nicotina, un posible problema de salud pública emergente. Economic impact of timely diagnosis and early referral in comprehensive cancer care in Mexico: the DERIVA strategy. Evaluación crítica de las políticas de prevención del sobrepeso y obesidad en escolares mexicanos. Revisión de caso. Clima y salud en la COP30: avances limitados y compromisos pendientes. Desigualdad en hospitalizaciones evitables por condiciones crónicas en México: magnitud y determinantes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1