Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients Still Better Off Than If Primary Arthroplasty Had Not Been Performed?

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.011
Justin Leal, Marcus DiLallo, Thorsten M Seyler, William A Jiranek, Samuel S Wellman, Michael P Bolognesi, Sean P Ryan
{"title":"Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients Still Better Off Than If Primary Arthroplasty Had Not Been Performed?","authors":"Justin Leal, Marcus DiLallo, Thorsten M Seyler, William A Jiranek, Samuel S Wellman, Michael P Bolognesi, Sean P Ryan","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) before primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and after successful treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with the hypothesis that patients still demonstrate clinical improvement despite the occurrence of PJI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent primary TJA, developed PJI, and were managed for PJI from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients who did not have PROMs recorded were excluded from the study. Pre- and postoperative generic and joint-specific PROMs were collected. Patient pre-primary and post-final revision surgery for PJI PROMs were subsequently compared. The minimum follow-up after PJI treatment was six months. A total of 55 patients (31 TKA and 24 THA) were included with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years (range, six months to 4.5 years). All PJIs were managed via debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 1-stage, 1.5-stage, 2-stage revision, or resection arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After final revision surgery for PJI in TKA, patients had lower median patient-reported outcome measure information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores than before their primary surgery (62.0 [55.0, 67.0] versus 67.0 [65.0, 70.5]; P < 0.01). However, median PROMIS physical function (PF) post-final revision for PJI and pre-primary scores were similar (38.0 [33.0, 42.0] versus 34.0 [29.5, 40.0]; P = 0.08). After final revision surgery for PJI in THA, patients had lower median PROMIS PI scores than before their primary surgery (57.5 [53.8, 64.0] versus 68.0 [66.5, 74.0]; P < 0.01). After final revision surgery for PJI, patients also had higher median PROMIS PF scores than before their primary surgery (39.5 [33.5, 48.2] versus 29.5 [28.8, 34.2]; P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who have been successfully managed for PJI show improvement in generic and joint-specific PROMs compared to their pre-primary TJA PROMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study sought to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) before primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and after successful treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with the hypothesis that patients still demonstrate clinical improvement despite the occurrence of PJI.

Methods: A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent primary TJA, developed PJI, and were managed for PJI from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients who did not have PROMs recorded were excluded from the study. Pre- and postoperative generic and joint-specific PROMs were collected. Patient pre-primary and post-final revision surgery for PJI PROMs were subsequently compared. The minimum follow-up after PJI treatment was six months. A total of 55 patients (31 TKA and 24 THA) were included with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years (range, six months to 4.5 years). All PJIs were managed via debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 1-stage, 1.5-stage, 2-stage revision, or resection arthroplasty.

Results: After final revision surgery for PJI in TKA, patients had lower median patient-reported outcome measure information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores than before their primary surgery (62.0 [55.0, 67.0] versus 67.0 [65.0, 70.5]; P < 0.01). However, median PROMIS physical function (PF) post-final revision for PJI and pre-primary scores were similar (38.0 [33.0, 42.0] versus 34.0 [29.5, 40.0]; P = 0.08). After final revision surgery for PJI in THA, patients had lower median PROMIS PI scores than before their primary surgery (57.5 [53.8, 64.0] versus 68.0 [66.5, 74.0]; P < 0.01). After final revision surgery for PJI, patients also had higher median PROMIS PF scores than before their primary surgery (39.5 [33.5, 48.2] versus 29.5 [28.8, 34.2]; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Patients who have been successfully managed for PJI show improvement in generic and joint-specific PROMs compared to their pre-primary TJA PROMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Previous Pelvic Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients Still Better Off Than If Primary Arthroplasty Had Not Been Performed? Serum C-Reactive Protein to Hemoglobin Ratio: Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Distinctive Polyethylene Damage in Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Retrieval Study in Patients Revised with Clinical Instability. Does Stem Design Affect the Incidence of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Secondary Analysis of the HEALTH Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1