Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio Less Than 0.4 is Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Unsuccessfully Reperfused Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large-Vessel Occlusion.

Vivek Yedavalli, Hamza Adel Salim, Aneri Balar, Dhairya A Lakhani, Janet Mei, Hanzhang Lu, Licia Luna, Francis Deng, Vaibhav Vagal, Nathan Z Hyson, Jens Fiehler, Paul Stracke, Gabriel Broocks, Christian Heitkamp, Gregory W Albers, Max Wintermark, Tobias D Faizy, Jeremy J Heit
{"title":"Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio Less Than 0.4 is Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Unsuccessfully Reperfused Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large-Vessel Occlusion.","authors":"Vivek Yedavalli, Hamza Adel Salim, Aneri Balar, Dhairya A Lakhani, Janet Mei, Hanzhang Lu, Licia Luna, Francis Deng, Vaibhav Vagal, Nathan Z Hyson, Jens Fiehler, Paul Stracke, Gabriel Broocks, Christian Heitkamp, Gregory W Albers, Max Wintermark, Tobias D Faizy, Jeremy J Heit","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Endovascular thrombectomy is a standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO), but a large minority of patients do not achieve successful reperfusion. This study aimed to investigate the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) as a prognostic biomarker in unsuccessfully reperfused patients with AIS-LVO.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 2 comprehensive stroke centers, involving patients with AIS-LVO who underwent endovascular thrombectomy but did not achieve successful reperfusion, defined as a modified TICI score of 0-2a. HIR, derived from CT or MR perfusion imaging, was analyzed for its association with favorable clinical outcomes (90-day mRs score of 0-2). The optimal HIR threshold predictive of favorable outcomes was identified through receiver operating curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 129 patients included, 20 (15.5%) achieved favorable outcomes. HIR of <0.4 significantly predicted favorable outcomes with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 80%. Patients with an HIR of <0.4 demonstrated better clinical and imaging profiles, including lower admission NIHSS scores and smaller ischemic core volumes. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed HIR, along with age and the presence of hemorrhagic transformation, as independent predictors of favorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In unsuccessfully reperfused patients with AIS-LVO, an HIR of <0.4 is associated with favorable outcomes, emphasizing on the importance of robust collateral circulation. This finding suggests that perfusion imaging and HIR evaluation could guide clinical decision-making and prognostication in this challenging patient subset.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Endovascular thrombectomy is a standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO), but a large minority of patients do not achieve successful reperfusion. This study aimed to investigate the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) as a prognostic biomarker in unsuccessfully reperfused patients with AIS-LVO.

Materials and methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 2 comprehensive stroke centers, involving patients with AIS-LVO who underwent endovascular thrombectomy but did not achieve successful reperfusion, defined as a modified TICI score of 0-2a. HIR, derived from CT or MR perfusion imaging, was analyzed for its association with favorable clinical outcomes (90-day mRs score of 0-2). The optimal HIR threshold predictive of favorable outcomes was identified through receiver operating curve analysis.

Results: Of 129 patients included, 20 (15.5%) achieved favorable outcomes. HIR of <0.4 significantly predicted favorable outcomes with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 80%. Patients with an HIR of <0.4 demonstrated better clinical and imaging profiles, including lower admission NIHSS scores and smaller ischemic core volumes. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed HIR, along with age and the presence of hemorrhagic transformation, as independent predictors of favorable outcomes.

Conclusions: In unsuccessfully reperfused patients with AIS-LVO, an HIR of <0.4 is associated with favorable outcomes, emphasizing on the importance of robust collateral circulation. This finding suggests that perfusion imaging and HIR evaluation could guide clinical decision-making and prognostication in this challenging patient subset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety in the use of Pipeline Vantage Shield stent versus Pipeline Flex Shield stent in the treatment of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study. Patterns of Epidural Patch Distribution: The Influence of Spinal Level, Injection Technique, and Patch Volume/Composition on Craniocaudal and Ventral Epidural Dispersion. The effect of diagnostic hypercapnic cerebrovascular reactivity imaging on vital signs and acute and follow-up ischemic adverse events in patients with flow-limiting intracranial arterial stenosis. Comparison of prophylactic endovascular treatments for threatened or impending internal/common carotid artery blowout syndrome. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound in Neck Node NIRADS Category 2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1