The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1080/09602011.2025.2462040
Grahame K Simpson, Lauren Gillett, Eng-Siew Koh, Alexanda J Walker, Joe Hanna, Wafa Trad, Teresa Simpson, Diane L Whiting
{"title":"The Strategy Use Measure (SUM): A new tool to evaluate the use of compensatory behavioural strategies for cognitive, emotional and behavioural impairments after acquired brain injury.","authors":"Grahame K Simpson, Lauren Gillett, Eng-Siew Koh, Alexanda J Walker, Joe Hanna, Wafa Trad, Teresa Simpson, Diane L Whiting","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2462040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Strategy Use Measure (SUM) was developed as a systematic tool to assess cognitive, behavioural and emotional strategy use by clients and carers after acquired brain injury. Comprehensive content development was undertaken across four clinical service sites via expert clinician consultation and consensus, file review of strategies used in clinical practice, and consumer consultation. Statistical analysis was undertaken to evaluate items and assess reliability, validity and factor structure. Two final versions of the SUM were developed, for use with clients (SUM-ABI; 14 items) and carers (SUM-C; 24 items). Internal consistency for the total scales was sound (SUM-ABI = <i>.90</i>; SUM-C = <i>.96</i>) as was test-retest reliability (SUM-ABI <i>= .87</i>; SUM-C <i>= .90</i>). Meaningful factors were identified for both scales (SUM-ABI: Memory and Planning, Emotion and Mood, Cognitive Load; SUM-C: Executive Support, Emotion/Behaviour Support, Enhancing Task Performance, Motivation Support) with all subscales demonstrating strong internal consistency (≥.80). Construct validity for both scales was explored using validated measures. The SUM versions were evaluated against COSMIN instrument design standards and found overall to be reliable and valid, with promising utility in rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1805-1827"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2462040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Strategy Use Measure (SUM) was developed as a systematic tool to assess cognitive, behavioural and emotional strategy use by clients and carers after acquired brain injury. Comprehensive content development was undertaken across four clinical service sites via expert clinician consultation and consensus, file review of strategies used in clinical practice, and consumer consultation. Statistical analysis was undertaken to evaluate items and assess reliability, validity and factor structure. Two final versions of the SUM were developed, for use with clients (SUM-ABI; 14 items) and carers (SUM-C; 24 items). Internal consistency for the total scales was sound (SUM-ABI = .90; SUM-C = .96) as was test-retest reliability (SUM-ABI = .87; SUM-C = .90). Meaningful factors were identified for both scales (SUM-ABI: Memory and Planning, Emotion and Mood, Cognitive Load; SUM-C: Executive Support, Emotion/Behaviour Support, Enhancing Task Performance, Motivation Support) with all subscales demonstrating strong internal consistency (≥.80). Construct validity for both scales was explored using validated measures. The SUM versions were evaluated against COSMIN instrument design standards and found overall to be reliable and valid, with promising utility in rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
策略使用测量(SUM):一种评估获得性脑损伤后认知、情绪和行为障碍的代偿行为策略使用的新工具。
策略使用测量(SUM)是作为一种系统工具而开发的,用于评估后天性脑损伤患者和护理者在认知、行为和情感方面的策略使用情况。通过临床专家咨询和共识、临床实践中使用策略的档案审查以及消费者咨询,在四个临床服务地点进行了全面的内容开发。通过统计分析对项目进行评估,并对可靠性、有效性和因素结构进行评估。最终开发出两个版本的 SUM,分别用于客户(SUM-ABI;14 个项目)和护理者(SUM-C;24 个项目)。总量表的内部一致性良好(SUM-ABI = .90;SUM-C = .96),测试-再测可靠性也良好(SUM-ABI = .87;SUM-C = .90)。两个量表都确定了有意义的因子(SUM-ABI:记忆与计划、情绪与心情、认知负荷;SUM-C:执行支持、情绪/行为支持、提高任务绩效、动机支持),所有子量表均显示出较强的内部一致性(≥.80)。两个量表的结构效度均采用有效的测量方法进行了探讨。根据 COSMIN 工具设计标准对 SUM 版本进行了评估,发现总体上是可靠和有效的,有望在临床医生和研究人员的康复治疗中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
Constructing the conditions for wellbeing: A qualitative evaluation of group-based ecotherapy for adults living with acquired brain injury. Exploring the meaning of life (MoL) after acquired brain injury (ABI) in Costa Rica. Self-reported reading difficulties and rehabilitation goals in individuals with homonymous visual field defects. Measurement of cross-language and cross-domain generalization following semantic feature-based anomia treatment in bilingual aphasia. Development and psychometric validation of the hospital discharge readiness scale for post-operative brain tumour patients in Chinese adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1